Yuri Kobzar23:03, 01/28/24
The West’s failure to provide Ukraine with enough weapons and failure to properly implement sanctions gives the aggressor confidence that he will win.

The Kremlin is full of optimism and confidence that it will be able to successfully resist the West by establishing closer economic and diplomatic ties with China and the countries of the Global South. The Washington Post writes about this based on interviews with Russian and European officials and businessmen.
Russia was emboldened by its success in repelling a Western-backed Ukrainian counter-offensive, leading to a political stalemate in Washington and Brussels over continued funding for Kyiv. In Moscow’s view, America’s support for Israel’s invasion of Gaza has damaged Washington’s position in many parts of the world. The coincidence of events has sparked a surge of optimism regarding Russia’s global position,” the publication says.
Officials in Moscow boast of increased trade with China, military cooperation with Iran and diplomatic contacts in the Arab world. The Kremlin is also happy that it was able to expand the BRICS group to include Iran, the United Arab Emirates, Egypt and Ethiopia.
WP notes that Putin’s political position has been strengthened by the belief that Russia has proven more resilient militarily and economically than the West expected. Especially among the Russian elite, which was initially skeptical about the war in Ukraine and the Russian Federation’s ability to resist sanctions.
“There has been a certain consolidation in the Russian elite. There is a certain expectation that in the future the situation will change in Russia’s favor,” said a Russian scientist with close ties to the country’s senior diplomats.
An unnamed European official with whom the publication spoke noted that the West still hopes for a return to the previous order, the Russians “realized that this is impossible and are trying to build a new world.”
The publication calls a noticeable break between Moscow and Israel a manifestation of this – this partnership developed after the collapse of the USSR, but now they have decided to sacrifice it in favor of relations with Iran and Arab countries. Through these connections, the Kremlin will try to stir up conflicts that will be problematic and painful for the West.
“Putin, of course, is trying to undermine the world order, because for him this is the only survival strategy,” said former Russian political prisoner Mikhail Khodorkovsky.
He lists Russia’s recent geopolitical victories: Russia received tacit US consent to cross red lines in Syria, the US withdrew from Afghanistan, and Ukraine received only partial Western support. “ Outwardly, it looks as if the United States is losing World War III ,” says Khodorkovsky.
General Richard Barrons, the former commander of the UK’s Combined Forces, said the risks of strategic failure for the West were increasing due to a lack of political will to supply Ukraine with enough weapons and return to military industrial production.
“In terms of hidden military and economic power, it is absolutely ridiculous that the West has become hostage to something as relatively minuscule as Russia . Putin believes that if he is stubborn long enough, we, the weak West, will leave. And he may be right “It wouldn’t just be embarrassing. It would be an act of strategic self-harm,” he said.
The USA is losing its authority in the world
The Western press actively criticizes the United States for its failure to fulfill its own obligations to support Ukraine. According to The Atlantic , Washington’s hesitation to provide weapons to Ukraine convinces allies of the United States’ “political incompetence” and sends a message to Russia and China that the United States “is a degenerate, dying power.”
The Atlantic notes that the result of Ukraine’s betrayal will be the collapse of trust in the United States throughout the world. American allies will seek protection from more reliable partners, and America itself will be isolated and weakened.
(C)UNIAN 2024

It goes to show you what you can achieve by purchasing a few people across the West to make them bid your desires.
Putin: Buy American. I bought one Trump and got the entire Republican party for free.
(It’s a meme – I know that the entire Republican party isn’t MAGAturds. They’re just allowing themselves to be *controlled* by the magaputler minority.)
From a Heather Cox Richardson post:
Today—last night U.S. time—three military personnel were killed and 34 more wounded in a drone attack on the living quarters at a U.S. base in Jordan, near the Iraq-Syria border.
[…]
when Senator Wicker called on Biden to respond to the attack, Simon Rosenberg retorted, “Wasn’t funding Ukraine and Israel the first, critical step in deterring Iran? We are in this place now due to the Russian fifth columnists in the Republican Party including Trump who slavishly do Putin’s bidding.”
[…]
In the United States, today marks the 100th day that extremist Republicans have refused to provide supplemental funding for Ukraine or Israel arguing that funding to protect the U.S. border must be addressed first. On October 20, 2023, as David Frum pointed out today, Biden asked Congress for “$106 billion to aid Ukraine and Israel against attack by Russia, Iran, and their proxies.” That funding has bipartisan support, but “[f]or 100 days, House Republicans have said NO,” Frum said. “Today, Iranian proxies have killed Americans.”
Republicans’ insistence that they want border funding has proved to be a lie, as Democratic and Republican senators have hammered out a strong agreement that extremist Republicans now reject. Former president Trump has made it clear he wants to run on the idea that the border is overwhelmed, so has demanded his supporters prevent any solution. Today, on the Fox News Channel, when asked why Republicans should let Biden “take a victory lap” with a border deal, Senator James Lankford (R-OK), who has been part of the border deal negotiation team, responded with some heat:
“Republicans four months ago would not give funding for Ukraine, for Israel, and for our southern border because we demanded changes in policy. So we actually locked arms together and said we’re not going to give you money for this, we want a change in law. And now it’s interesting, a few months later, when we’re finally getting to the end they’re like, ‘Oh, just kidding, I actually don’t want a change in law because [it’s] a presidential election year.’ We all have an oath to the Constitution, and we have a commitment to say we’re going to do whatever we can to be able to secure the border.”
In The Atlantic, Frum noted that “vital aid to Israel and Ukraine must be delayed and put in further doubt because of a rejected president’s spite and his party’s calculation of electoral advantage. The true outcome of the fiasco in Congress will be the collapse of U.S. credibility all over the world. American allies will seek protection from more trustworthy partners, and America itself will be isolated and weakened.”
Rosenberg wrote: “If you are unhappy with Iran today, first thing you should do is come out for funding Ukraine fully. Nothing will embolden Iran more than a Russian victory in Europe.”
https://heathercoxrichardson.substack.com/p/january-28-2024