Will western leaders cut and run as the costs of the Ukraine war mount?

Simon Tisdall

The longer the war goes on, the more the early anti-Putin momentum could be stalled by political stresses, an energy crisis and the huge bill for military and humanitarian aid

How long will the western democracies maintain present levels of support for Ukraine? The war’s economic impact, already manifesting itself through spiralling inflation and living costs, could have seriously negative political consequences for elected leaders in the US, Germany, France and the UK. If public willingness to make difficult sacrifices diminishes in the months ahead and the conflict slips off the front pages, will they stay the course?

As Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelenskiy, is keenly aware, western love for his country is already highly conditional. Military assistance is limited by Nato’s fear of provoking Vladimir Putin. Emmanuel Macron, France’s president, is “over-eagerly” pushing for a negotiated deal at the risk, British officials claim, of overriding Kyiv’s best interests. Accused by his far-right rival, Marine Le Pen, of ignoring domestic problems, Macron’s poll lead has narrowed before this month’s two-round election.

Germany’s chancellor, Olaf Scholz, is currently fixated on the security of domestic energy supplies, not the future security of Europe. He knows Putin’s threat to cut off the gas, if implemented, would spark a national emergency. Scholz’s ruling coalition is creaking after a row with the Greens, who say he and his former boss, Angela Merkel, were “blind” to the risks of energy dependence on Russia.

This argument will only intensify, the longer the war continues – and not only in Germany. “Europe should stop spending up to €800m per day on purchasing Russian gas,” a new paper from the Centre for European Reform argues. “In 2021 … Russia exported more than 49% of its oil and 74% of its gas to Europe.” Halting all such purchases voluntarily, it said, might be the most effective sanction Europe could impose. “The political will to take such a radical step is still absent.” And, sadly, likely to remain so.

Joe Biden’s Nato and EU summitry last weekend did not produce a much-needed long-term plan for defeating Russia or better weapons for Ukraine’s defenders. But it did raise questions about his leadership. Biden’s crisis management has brought a modest poll boost. A new survey showed 61% of Americans believe higher petrol prices, up 20% in a month, are worth it to beat Russia. Most support additional US troop deployments.

But this spirit of solidarity is finite. Biden looks tired and vulnerable, with a low overall approval rating of 41%. Only 39% approve his handling of the economy. This is the battlefield that matters most in the US as a neo-Trumpist Republican party eyes a takeover of Congress in November. This is why the White House has tapped its strategic oil reserves. Will stumbling Biden stay the course, or seek a quick way out?

In the US and EU, early anti-Putin momentum seems to have stalled and may even be reversing. Ukraine’s foreign minister, Dmytro Kuleba, urged Brussels last week to swiftly introduce a fifth sanctions package. But foreign policy chief Josep Borrell said the EU would “maintain” rather than “elevate” pressure on Moscow – the overly cautious approach favoured by Paris and Berlin which infuriates Poland and the Baltic republics.

Russia is actively exploiting these divisions. “The irresponsible Brussels sanctions already negatively affect the daily life of ordinary Europeans,” a foreign ministry official said. Western leaders risked making their peoples’ situation worse, the official added, amid fresh Russian threats to block food and agricultural exports. Meanwhile, China and India give succour to Putin by buying discounted Russian oil.

Ukraine-related pressures on western leaders are undoubtedly escalating across the board. The IMF warned last month that the war would cause “devastating” damage to the global economy as well as deep recessions in Russia and Ukraine. One forecast published last month predicted a £90bn hit to the UK alone as consumers and businesses struggle to recover from the pandemic.

In Spain, the far-right populist party, Vox, has used rising prices to fuel anti-government demonstrations. Similarly politicised protests have been seen in France, Italy and Greece. Worries about a wider war, meanwhile, may help Viktor Orbán, Hungary’s Putin-friendly prime minister, win re-election this weekend.

It may be that western politicians will keep their word and honour their commitments to Ukraine. Or maybe not. Zelenskiy, for one, has his doubts. Speaking to the Economist, he expressed reservations about the trustworthiness and reliability of some leaders, including Boris Johnson.

“Britain wants Ukraine to win and Russia to lose … It is not performing a balancing act,” Zelenskiy said. But he added that he was unsure whether Johnson secretly hoped the war would drag on, thereby weakening Putin (and strengthening Johnson). Zelenskiy said Germany’s “pragmatic” Scholz was mistakenly “on the fence” and urged Orbán to pick a side. His harshest words were reserved for Macron’s government. “They are afraid,” he said bluntly.

If the war grinds on into the autumn, as many predict, economic pain, especially over energy costs, resulting political stresses, “sanctions fatigue”, increased public apathy, and the daunting financial cost of open-ended military assistance, humanitarian aid, and millions of refugees could combine to critically undermine governments’ support for Ukraine’s fight.

A western failure on this scale would be a disaster for Ukraine’s people, Europe’s security and common decency. But it’s possible to see how it might happen. Putin, of course, is watching, waiting for fatal cracks to appear. Yet he, too, faces deeply threatening internal tensions and challenges, as western intelligence chiefs noted last week. They suggest he’s at odds with his generals, is out of touch, and could be losing control.

Maybe this is how the war ends. Not with a bang or a shabby deal but with a slow collapse. Who will last longer: Putin the deluded, paranoid war criminal, or the motley crew of unreliable western politicians who oppose him?

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/apr/03/will-western-leaders-cut-and-run-as-the-costs-of-the-ukraine-war-mount

7 comments

  1. If the West capitulate now, they will be subject to blackmail every time Putler decides to invade yet another country. Unless the war criminal is destroyed now, the West might as well just elect him as their leader.

  2. The West, hopefully, thoroughly understands the implications, in full, of a wining mafia land. Ukraine’s defeat would not only mean that the money spent on supporting it would have been completely wasted, but Putler and his regime would be more securely in power than ever before. It would also mean a future confrontation, if the West wants it or not. This will mean even more money being burned and maybe far worse consequences for the continent and the world. And, we’re not even considering the ramifications this would have with bat virus land’s foreign policy.
    The West MUST stick to its guns and not only keep up the flow of help, but increase it. The only goal must be a defeated mafia land, and nothing less.

  3. I don’t see the US easing up. I see the republicans vocally criticizing Biden for not doing everything including sending offensive weapons. Given the November elections , the Dems are under more pressure to get Biden to get off his ass. Perhaps this just wishful thinking.

  4. “a neo-Trumpist Republican party eyes a takeover of Congress in November. Will stumbling Biden stay the course, or seek a quick way out?”
    You are missinformed on Trump and not wise making statements like this when you need his help badly. He will be our next President and probably before 2024 as Biden’s dimentia is getting worse and Kamala has no clue. The last election was total fraud and needs to be reversed. Trump won by a landslide. The Biden cabal, including Jake Sullivan may end up jailed when the Durham report comes out next month. The corrupt Biden regime, cashing in off of Ukraine & Burisma, is being dealt with here. Hunter Biden is about to be indicted. They are no help to you. Bidens received $3.5mil from a Russian olygarch that is exempt from out sanctioned list. Biden is compromised..
    Trump warned the EU not to buy Russian oil and gas. They laughed. Not funny now. He voted down the pipeline while Biden voted for it and Biden is still buying Russian oil till the end of June. He is looking into buying oil from Madura, Iran and other dictators rather than let us drill here as we have enough for us and Europe.
    Trump kept Putin out of Ukraine for 4 yrs. Putin invaded under the socialists Obama and Biden but was afraid of Trump. The Biden socialist regime is coming down soon.
    And the biolabs there, US DOD funded will end as well when Trump is back. Newland, Dept of State testified before the senate that there are US labs there. She said they were afraid Russians would get to them. Then Biden lied and said no we have no labs there. That same day he warned that Russia would use bio weapons on Ukraine.
    You can not lean on this man to be trustworthy. Trump will be back to save America from socialism and the world.

      • All very good points Denise. And factual. It’s not easy for us to watch Trump seem comfortable with the psychopath in the Kremlin but who’s to say what the best method is to deal with a psychopath?

Enter comments here: