The F-16 exceeded the expectations of Ukrainian pilots during the training. Interview with the pilot of the Air Force Phantom

February 09, 2024

Phantom Air Force Pilot. 
The photo is published as provided by the pilot Fant

Ukrainian pilots who undergo training in the USA and the EU on the fourth generation F-16 Western fighters are “very impressed” by this aircraft. At the same time, retraining has its challenges, because this fighter is very different from the Soviet Su-27 and MiG-29, which the Ukrainian fighter aircraft currently flies.

A military pilot of the Air Force of the Ukrainian Armed Forces with the call sign Phantom told about this in an interview with Maria Prus, a journalist of the Ukrainian Service of the Voice of America.

He also spoke about the impressions of Western instructors from the training of Ukrainian pilots, the readiness of the infrastructure in Ukraine to receive these fighters and how other aircraft, such as the A-10 or Gripen, can strengthen the Defense Forces of Ukraine.

The interview has been edited for clarity and flow

Maria Prus, VOA: I recently spoke with American aviators Peter Greenburgh and Trevor Gerten, and they talked about their initiative where they collect military equipment, equipment, various equipment and give it to Ukrainian pilots. Tell us how much they helped you. And maybe some other areas where they help you?

Phantom: Yes, I know these two gentlemen personally and they really help our guys in the Air Force and also in Army aviation: like with aviation equipment, aviation uniforms, that is, flight suits.

And usually, in principle, a lot of help comes from our pilot partners. It started a long time ago, from the 1997s, when, if I am not mistaken, our pilots visited an air show in the USA on their Su-27 aircraft (Ukrainian pilots participated in air shows in 1992 in Canada and the USA and in 1997 in air show in Britain – ed.). And then it continued during the joint military exercises ” Clear Sky ” in 2011 and 2018 (at the “Safe Sky” exercises – ed.). It was extreme training.

And the pilots could get to know each other personally, establish closer relations during these exercises. Both our pilots and their pilots exchanged experience. We learned how Western air forces conduct air operations. That is, our pilots were already gaining experience. And this event helped not only our boys in their combat abilities, but also they received these priceless personal acquaintances with them. And then, when the full-scale invasion began in 2022, it was the close relationship that helped us get many different things, both material and immaterial.

Photos provided by the pilot of the Armed Forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine with the call sign "Phantom"
Photos provided by the pilot of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation with the call sign Phantom

M.P.: Recently, in an interview, a pilot with the call sign Moonfish talked about training on the F-16. He, like the deceased pilot Andrii Pilshchikov Jus, previously also said that Ukrainian pilots tried to prepare themselves, studied the theoretical basis that they could find in open sources. And Moonfish also said that there is informal communication with Western pilots.

Phantom: It all started with these acquaintances that were during training. So everyone communicated with the pilots personally through various means of communication. And in principle, when the war began, not only Trevor and Pete helped our pilots in parallel.

And when the issue of retraining pilots for a new type of aircraft began, even before it was known which aircraft would replace our outdated Soviet fleet, we already started working on changing the concept and training. That is, we already understood during these exercises that our approaches, our procedures are very different. And it was the partner pilots, not only American pilots, but also from other countries, who formed a kind of online training courses so that we would know in which direction to move, and then to improve and speed up the retraining for the F-16 aircraft.

And, as you know, our guys went to one of the air bases in the United States for an evaluation in advance to assess their capabilities, abilities and determine the terms (of training). Again, these were general terms that we can agree on. And our pilots didn’t waste time, they prepared as best they could, and the same pilots helped us with information from open sources – of course, that which they could share with us, and even their experience.

Therefore, I will say that the guys who went in the first wave were ready both mentally and had basic knowledge.

The photo was provided by the pilot of the Air Force of the Armed Forces of Ukraine with the call sign Phantom
The photo was provided by the pilot of the Air Force of the Armed Forces of Ukraine with the call sign Phantom

Retraining Ukrainians on the F-16

M.P.: At what stage is this preparation now?

Phantom: Preparations are in full swing as planned. Not only the pilots are trained, but as you know, so are the ground staff, our mechanics who will maintain those aircraft, our support units who will ensure that the missions are carried out. They prepare in the same way.

According to the terms, as planned, about 6 months of training for one pilot or one group. But there are nuances, and they are mostly not related to our personnel, it is related to the administrative work of our partners, that is, there is its own bureaucracy, and it requires time. Therefore, it affected the time of preparation. But she follows the plan.

And of course, everyone wants to get the planes as quickly as possible, but that’s not usually how things are done. Aviation is a very complex system, it is not one tank or one artillery installation. There’s a lot of staff on the plane and it’s a big system. And a pilot or a technician is a small cog in a big system.

M.P.: What challenges do Ukrainian pilots undergoing this training currently face? And what do they think of the F-16 in general? What are their impressions?

Phantom: Our pilots are very impressed. This plane simply exceeded their expectations. Even with the amount of information they have received during training, they already see great prospects and great potential for how this aircraft will help our Air Force to increase our combat aviation capabilities. And you can imagine that there’s information that they haven’t learned yet, haven’t given them yet, about what else this aircraft might be capable of.

As for the challenges, it’s a new plane for our guys and it was a bit difficult at the beginning, because it’s a new generation plane, a more digitalized plane, it has a lot of systems and programs that have to be entered during the flight and before the flight. We have not encountered this, our training is a little different, and our aircraft is much simpler than the F-16.

And likewise, the approach to preparation and flight performance is completely different. It requires more independent training, no one is above their soul, so it was a little difficult for them to readjust mentally. But, as I already said, they are very motivated and the desire to quickly relearn – overcomes all these difficulties.

M.P.: Does the teaching style or methods differ in Europe, in Denmark, from how the same transition to the F-16 is taught in the USA?

Phantom: I would say that the program is not different because the partners discussed the training program, it is agreed. All countries that are part of NATO have standards, and therefore the standards of aircraft training – wherever it is, whether in the USA, or in Denmark, or in Greece, or in Turkey – are the same, so the training program is the same, but the approach itself may differ somewhat.

Photos provided by the pilot of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation with the call sign Phantom
Photos provided by the pilot of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation with the call sign Phantom

MP: What are the impressions of American or European instructors about Ukrainian pilots? How do they rate their training and learning speed?

Phantom: The first impression of our boys from the instructors was that they are motivated, their eyes are burning. Even one instructor said they could see how they wanted to start retraining ASAP. And in general, the impression and the feedback we will receive from the instructors is very positive.

And having the experience of training pilots from other countries, they can already compare. They say that the Ukrainian pilots are very strong, and they see the experience they have gained in aerial combat in Ukraine since the start of a full-scale invasion, and it is these skills that they will try to improve on the F-16s.

Western pilots – in the sky of Ukraine?

M.P.: Tell me, how do the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation assess the chances that retired Western pilots could help Ukrainians protect Ukrainian skies while Ukrainian pilots are trained, as retired US Air Force Lt. Col. Dan Hampton previously suggested? How realistic is this idea?

Phantom: I’d say you know we’ve been expecting these pilots since the beginning of the invasion. From the first days, you remember how our citizens begged to close the sky so that those rockets would not fall on the heads of our compatriots and to save these lives. But unfortunately, the Armed Forces and the Air Force of Ukraine were forced to continue to fight independently, of course, not without the help of our partner countries with weapons and not only.

And with regard to the current realities, yes, of course, we would like to see retired pilots, experienced F-16 pilots in the skies of Ukraine, but the Air Force Command made an analysis, took all the data that we have, the terms that we will have , analyzed and came to the conclusion that there is no urgent need for foreign pilots in the skies of Ukraine.

Of course, if they were on their planes, it would increase our chances, but you know there are limits and nuances.

The photo was provided by the pilot of the Air Force of the Armed Forces of Ukraine with the call sign Phantom
The photo was provided by the pilot of the Air Force of the Armed Forces of Ukraine with the call sign Phantom

M.P.: Various experts previously explained that aviation is a system, that is, it is not about one person or one plane, everything works in a complex.

Phantom: Yes, because all operations carried out by Western partners are not carried out by a single group. This is a very large and complex preparation, a complex mission even to achieve some small goals and tasks.

But it helps to increase the effect, increase the probability of achieving this goal and reduce the risks to the pilots who perform the task. Therefore, of course, it will be difficult to carry out tasks on the F-16 alone, it will be wrong, so to speak.

And if we go back to those experienced pilots who already had experience on F-16 aircraft, we can glean that the current realities of aerial combat and the air situation in Ukraine are radically different from the situations experienced by those pilots who are currently serving or have recently been discharged.

It is similar to the situation that was in Iraq in ’91, but now it is not what it was a few years ago.

The photo was provided by the pilot of the Air Force of the Armed Forces of Ukraine with the call sign Phantom
The photo was provided by the pilot of the Air Force of the Armed Forces of Ukraine with the call sign Phantom

Is Ukraine ready to receive F-16?

M.P.: Tell me, please, how ready is the infrastructure in Ukraine to accept the F-16?

Phantom: The infrastructure, like the rest of our staff, which is now preparing to receive the F-16 aircraft, is being prepared according to the plan. There are nuances, there are difficulties, but our partners help us with these difficulties. I can assure you that by the time the F-16 aircraft are ready for delivery to Ukraine, the infrastructure will be ready – as will our people.

M.P.: And how many Ukrainian pilots are currently training on the F-16 or how many pilots does the Ukrainian Air Force plan to transfer to these planes in the future?

Phantom: Of course, I can’t tell you the number, but I want to say that the number is sufficient to perform tasks on the number of planes that will be handed over to us when they are ready.

And this training system will continue to give us ready-made personnel with those aircraft that will be transferred. Of course, we would like to have more, but we return again to the problems that are not only ours – with training and with the number of places for training that our partners have.

M.P.: If we talk about the maintenance of the F-16 aircraft, because each combat sortie is a certain amount of money, then how, from which budgets will it be paid for? Are these not such large sums compared to the cost of the aircraft itself and the training of the pilot?

Phantom: Regarding the cost of maintaining an aircraft and conducting combat operations on these aircraft, I can say one thing: aviation is not a cheap thing, all countries understand this, all countries support aviation banally because the effect that aviation gives on the battlefield is much greater than those the costs incurred by them.

I can also add that performing tasks on the planes of our existing fleet is also not free.

Of course, compared to the sums we lose on Soviet planes, they are a little more, but it is worth it.

Training in Britain and other aircraft for the Air Force of the Armed Forces

MP: Tell us about studying in Great Britain. Britain announced that it was ready to train Ukrainian pilots , but the British Air Force does not operate the F-16, so there was an explanation that it was about training the next generation of Ukrainian pilots.

Phantom: Yes, of course, there are several stages in the development of the Air Force, and we do not focus on the immediate future, we see much further. Therefore, there is a great future perspective, and we are also moving there.

And having these trained pilots – and not only – in the future, somewhere in 2-3 or 5 years, we will be able to train them on both F-16 and other aircraft that may be in service with the Air Force of Ukraine.

Photos provided by the pilot of the ZSU Air Force Phantom
Photos provided by the pilot of the ZSU Air Force Phantom

M.P.: Separately, there are also discussions about the need for A-10 , Gripen or other types of aircraft for the Ukrainian aviation. What can you say?

Phantom: A-10 is a very good aircraft in its class. It is well suited to support ground forces from the air. But the current realities in our airspace along and near the combat contact line, and also near the occupied territories, will not allow them to perform these tasks, because a very large aviation component is needed for cover, to clear the airspace from the enemy’s means of fire damage. I am talking about long-range and medium-range anti-aircraft vehicles. Therefore, he simply physically will not be able to perform those tasks.

Another matter is, for example, the Swedish-made Saab Gripen aircraft. This is a very modern aircraft, it has gone through many stages of modernization, and currently the official fleet that the Swedish Air Force has in its composition can perform both the suppression of enemy air defense forces, the task of point fire damage, and what is called a standoff weapon in English – i.e. weapons at a distance that does not allow you to hit your aircraft. And it also has great potential against enemy aircraft, and those that Russia currently has at its disposal, Su-35 and Su-30 aircraft, Gripen of the latest generation can reach.

https://www.holosameryky.com/a/pilot-phantom-interview/7476726.html

13 comments

  1. “The first impression of our boys from the instructors was that they are motivated, their eyes are burning. Even one instructor said they could see how they wanted to start retraining ASAP. And in general, the impression and the feedback we will receive from the instructors is very positive.
    “And having the experience of training pilots from other countries, they can already compare. They say that the Ukrainian pilots are very strong, and they see the experience they have gained in aerial combat in Ukraine since the start of a full-scale invasion, and it is these skills that they will try to improve on the F-16s.”

    Haven’t we been hearing all along of the Ukrainians’ great enthusiasm to learn and the speed of learning from every other Western weapon system? Yes, we have. With such burning desires, good leadership, sound strategies and tactics, the F-16s will do great things in the hands of these pilots.

    • Right, Mr. Ofp, if the enthusiastic and impressively knowledgeable pilot “Phantom” is typical for the Ukrainians chosen to fly the new planes, the introduction of the F-16 in the theatre will become a great success. However, let’s not get carried away: We can’t expect miracles from Nato’s standard fighter jet, despite the large number of weapons it can carry. This is the workhorse of many Nato airforces, but it’s not on the latest level if development. As “Phantom” mentioned, the Swedish Gripen would be even better suited for fighting Su-35 and Su-30. Let’s hope that this fine fighter jet will become available later this year, too. That would be a reasonable next step for strengthening the Ukrainian airforce. As this interview has shown, the pilots are not the problem, they are admirably commited to meet and master the challenges of the future.

      • The Gripen would’ve had one great advantage of the F-16, and this is that it doesn’t have the air intake so close to the ground as the F-16’s. This makes starting and landing on rough surfaces easier. It also has a more robust landing gear.
        However, which plane is the better one in aerial combat is open for debate. But, fact is that both the F-16 and Gripen are some of the most maneuverable fighters in the world.
        Generally, both are very capable planes and the advantages and disadvantages for both planes offset each other. The F-16 has the better cannon for dogfights and for ground attack roles. Parts for the F-16 are much easier to come by, seeing that thousands of them exist in numerous countries. There are only several hundred Gripens.

        • “However, which plane is the better one in aerial combat is open for debate.”
          Well, “Phantom” seems to think otherwise. Maybe because “In 2006, Swedish Gripen aircraft participated in Red Flag – Alaska, a multinational air combat exercise hosted by the United States Air Force. Gripen flew simulated combat sorties against F-16 Block 50, Eurofighter Typhoon and F-15C and scored ten kills, including a Eurofighter Typhoon and five F-16 Block 50s on day one of the exercises with no losses.”
          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saab_JAS_39_Gripen#Sweden

          The Swedish plane is the morecmodern development, 14 years younger, which probably makes a difference. Also, it can use the European Meteor missile, whose range exceeds that of the F-16s’ AMRAAM. Since the Gripen also has STOL ability and thus can operate from improvised airstrips closer to the front, it is more suitable for intercepting Russian attack planes.

          • I would never base my opinion about which is better on a single competition, Mr. Gray. Mafia land has persistently won in tank biathlons, and we know how reality looks like on the ground.
            The F-16 is available in a wider range of models, operating in 25 different countries. It was designed and built as an air-superiority fighter and according to NATO standards, thus allowing it to carry a wider assortment of weapons than the Gripen, ranging from air-to-air missiles to precision-guided munitions and more. It also has a higher payload capacity. Its Vulcan Gatling cannon is also far better. The F-16 is combat-proven, while the Gripen is not.
            Since Ukraine has the F-16, talking about the Gripen is moot. If this plane should ever find its way to Ukraine, we’ll be a couple of years older. What is needed now additionally, however, is the A-10.

            • I made the point myself that the F-16 is the more versatile ground attack fighter. However, the advantages of the Gripen as an interceptor are plain to see: Longer range missile and deployment on improvised airfields. That’s what’s needed to keep the Russian attack planes with their glide bombs far away from the front. So, I stand by my view that the Gripen would be a very good addition to the F-16s.

              • It would be an excellent addition. But, Ukraine shouldn’t be overburdened with yet more types of fighter aircraft, IMHO, with all their additional complexities. In the end, only they and the allies will decide this.

            • Qs for the A-10, the interview made it very clear why this ground support plane is not suitable for the conditions at the Ukrainian front: No air superiority and too many short range SAMs there. So, sadly, the much beloved ole warthog is rather useless for Ukraine.
              The Gripen, on the other hand, does have advantages, Ukrainian pilots have already “tested” it (I suspect that’s actually basic training), Sweden has a surplus of well maintained planes and an interest in atteacting more customers. So, Ukraine could really get these fighters in this year.

              • With all due respect to this gentleman, but I tend to disagree. Others also disagree. I don’t know why some tend to downplay the A-10’s capabilities.
                The A-10 was designed and built during the Cold War for intensive ground combat operations. It’s a more capable plane than the current ground attack aircraft being used on both sides, the Su-25. Yet, the Su-25 is still flying over the battlefields today. The A-10 can at least match this survivability and even surpass it.
                The A-10 is a VERY agile aircraft. It’s the most maneuverable plane I’ve ever seen. Have you ever seen one flying in real? It’s breathtaking. It can do roles, barrel-roles, loops and flips almost like a biplane. Furthermore, it has flares to defend against AA missiles. One thing not to overlook is that it’s a military plane build for combat. Losses will happen. That’s the nature of this sort of human activity.

                • I loved to “fly” the A-10 Warthog in a PC simulator game, Mr. Ofp. Yeah, extreme manouverability, impressive firepower and a great armor safeguarding the pilot. However, as far as I can see from media reports, the somewhat comparable SU-25s aren’t flying over the frontlines anymore, those planes are used for delivering standoff weapans outside of manpad range. Not even the Warthog could survive in this most dangerous airspace for long, so the excellent cannon wouldn’t be of much use. It could instead shoot missiles from a safe distance and very low altitude, maybe better than the F-16 can, but would such aerial artillery missions be worth introducing yet another new airframe into the Ukrainuan arsenal? I see it of much higher importance to fight back against the Russian fighters delivering glide bombs and cruise missiles, and for that purpose, the Gripen would clearly be the better choice. I love the Warthog, really, but I honestly don’t think the Ukrainian frontline is the right environment for it. Your airmileage may vary, of course.

                • It is an amazing plane, maybe even my favourite.
                  It looks awesome!

                  But it absolutely has no use for Ukraine.
                  They are nice to kill some Taliban guys or Al Qaeda, not against a modern air force with long range anti-air.

                  They better give one to me than to Ukraine.

                  ^bert

                  • I respect your opinion, Bert, but I still see it differently. You just never saw this thing in action. It’s a spectacle. It’s hard to imagine a better tool to eat ground targets like they are made of paper mache. And the way it flies!
                    Yes, it’s an amazing plane. The best that Fairchild ever built. It would feel right at home in Ukraine’s skies.

Enter respectful comments here: