Republican Congressman Threatens Trump Administration Over Ukraine’s Starshield Limits

In brief: US Representative Brian Fitzpatrick, a Pennsylvania Republican, has vowed investigations, public hearings and budget cuts for anyone who restricted Ukraine’s Starshield access. President Volodymyr Zelensky confirmed on Monday, Oct. 19, that Starlink terminals still fail above 130-161 km/h (81-100 mp/h), although US President Donald Trump previously denied ordering restrictions, and claimed the system operated normally on Oct. 17. The pushback comes as outages continue crippling Ukrainian interceptor drones and the White House’s waiver of Russia sanctions deepens tensions with Kyiv.

Logo of Kyiv Post with the tagline 'Ukraine's Global Voice'.

Oct. 19, 2026

A politician speaking to reporters outside a government building, surrounded by microphones and hands reaching out for interviews.
US Representative Brian Fitzpatrick, Republican of Pennsylvania, speaks to the press on the steps of the US Capitol in Washington, DC on Sept. 29, 2023. (Photo by ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS / AFP)

A member of US President Donald Trump’s own Republican party warned on Monday, Oct. 19, that anyone who tries to restrict Ukraine’s use of Starshield will face accountability, including a full investigation, public hearings and steep budget cuts.

US Representative Brian Fitzpatrick, a Pennsylvania Republican, announced on X that he will speak with President Volodymyr Zelensky and his team this week about Starshield, sanctions on Russia and other issues tied to Ukraine’s defense.

He said Congress would reaffirm that Ukraine is an indispensable ally and Russia a self-declared enemy of the United States.

“The United States will 100% support and defend the people of Ukraine in their fight for their own freedom against this brutal, illegal, and unprovoked Russian invasion,” Fitzpatrick said, urging a complete ban on Russian oil imports and the toughest sanctions yet on Moscow.

Each measure, he said, would be brought to the White House and pass by an overwhelming margin.

On Oct. 10, a day after Trump’s abrupt diesel deal with Russian President Vladimir Putin, Fitzpatrick pledged to introduce bipartisan legislation, the “Roland Reagan Peace Through Strength Act,” blocking all purchases of Russian oil.

Starlink limits still cripple Ukraine’s drones

Separately on Monday, President Volodymyr Zelensky reiterated that Ukrainian units were still losing satellite connections.

After a report from the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU), Maj. Gen. Mykhailo Drapatyi, Zelensky said that Starlink and Starshield equipment still stops working at 130-160 kilometers per hour (81-100 miles per hour) on various parts of the front.

The restrictions are significantly slowing frontline logistics and limiting the use of several types of drones, including mid-strike drones and the interceptors Ukraine relies on against jet-powered Shahed drones.

“This must be raised with partners once again at all levels,” Zelensky said. “Speed matters for protecting lives.”

The limits first disrupted Ukrainian drone operations overnight on Oct. 13-14; around the same time, Ukrainian authorities also reported that they hadn’t received a partner warning about Russian ballistic missiles.

The next day, SpaceX CEO Elon Musk claimed that the US military, and ultimately Trump, sets speed limits on Ukraine’s Starshield terminals – not his company.

The Telegraph later reported, citing four sources, that Musk himself had proposed throttling the service and that Trump approved it. Trump, however, rejected that account.

“I don’t know if it was somebody, because it wasn’t me, and I don’t think it was Elon,” Trump told reporters. “And, as far as I understand, everything is the same as it’s always been.”

Sanctions waiver deepens rift

The Starlink dispute is unfolding alongside a growing public feud between Kyiv and Washington.

The tensions date back to Oct. 9, when a Ukrainian delegation met senior US envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner in Miami, hoping to reach a breakthrough on ending Russia’s aggression.

During the talks, the envoys reportedly warned that Washington would cut off intelligence sharing if Kyiv kept striking Russian oil refineries.

Several US outlets also reported that the administration threatened to suspend the Prioritized Ukraine Requirements List (PURL), the mechanism through which European allies buy American weapons for Ukraine, including Patriot interceptors.

US Ambassador to NATO Matthew Whitaker denied any changes to the PURL on Oct. 13.

Currently, Ukraine is facing a critical shortage of Patriots, which are the only weapons systems capable of deterring Russia’s ballistic missiles.

While the talks were still underway, Trump announced a diesel deal with Putin in Washington, under which Russia would supply hundreds of thousands of tons of fuel to US and global markets.

The US Treasury then lifted sanctions on Russian diesel exports through April 2027.

Around the same time, Trump slammed Kyiv for refinery strikes and called for a new president in Ukraine. “Zelensky could have settled this war many, many times, but he chooses not to,” Trump told reporters. “I think it’s time for Ukraine to get a new president.”

On Oct. 14, 12 senators – six Republicans and six Democrats – signed a joint letter urging Trump to rescind his deal with Putin, calling it a gift to Moscow and a betrayal of Ukraine.

“This deal is a gift to our adversary and a betrayal of our Allies; it should be rescinded,” the senators wrote, demanding the president to enforce the new Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026, signed by Trump just three weeks before striking the deal.

Despite condemnation from Ukraine, the EU and his own party members, Trump signed an executive order Friday, Oct. 16, waiving sweeping Russia sanctions and tariffs set to take effect Sunday, Oct. 18.

The White House defended this decision, saying it will allow for a peaceful resolution to Russia’s war.

https://www.kyivpost.com/post/87542

8 comments

  1. Fitzpatrick is a rarity in the former GOP. He has a sense of righteousness and has courage.

    Without enough Republicans siding with him, his threats will be useless. Things will look better in the near future, though.

    • I would remind you that more Democrats voted against the Graham act than Republicans. I know its hard to be fair but if you try really hard I think you can do it. Do it for Ukraine.

      • Can you take an educated guess why they voted against this bill? Maybe you can. Then maybe you will feel like a fool for backing up those spineless bastards of the former GOP.

        • And in the world of reality:
          Harvard/Harris Poll: Found that 73% of Republican voters and 72% of Democrats believe the U.S. should provide weapons to Ukraine and impose sanctions if Russia balks at peace negotiations.

          • Your poll is worthless when the orange crook doesn’t do as most of his voters want and they still suck his saliva. They suck his saliva on every other crime and treasonous acts he is committing, so this would be nothing new.
            Trump supporters are basically low life swamp dwelling bottom feeders.

      • I would remind you that back in July, when you referred to the 11 Democrats who opposed the watered-down toothless bill, I pointed out that:

        In June, Democrats passed a separate bill offering military support to Ukraine and sanctions on Russia, called the Ukraine Support Act, with only four Republicans.

        Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-NY), the author of that bill, has argued against the Graham Russia sanctions bill.

        “This is not so much a sanctions bill as it is a massive backdoor authority for President Trump to impose more tariffs,” he said shortly after the bill’s introduction.

        “The sanctions the bill does contain are entirely at Donald Trump’s discretion, and he has made clear repeatedly that he would rather waive sanctions on Russia than impose new ones.”

        There’s a very good reason that Democrats voted against that worthless bill; we can all see now that Rep. Meeks was 100% right on the money.

Enter respectful comments here: