ROMAN SHEREMETA

Oct 29, 2024

• So, is it normal? To come, kill, torture, rape, occupy territories, and then say “ok, now let’s talk about peace”? If yes, then why others cannot do the same, if the world is so impotent and nothing happens to mass murderers?
• 6 million Ukrainians live in the occupied territories. Who will tell them: “sorry, no one will come for you”? And another 5 million who left that area, who will tell them: “well, you will not get your home back, just live with it”.
• How can you guarantee that russia won’t attack again sometime in 2029, and won’t force some of those 6 millions to fight against Ukraine under the threat of executions?

………………

Whom do I block on Facebook:

• Pro-russian trolls and bots.
• Brainwashed useful idiots.
• People who question my integrity, insult me, or speak falsely about me.

If you belong to one of these categories then please do yourself a favor and just block yourself.

…………………

Ukraine has “provoked” Russia simply by existing.

The destruction of the Ukrainian people has been Russia’s goal for centuries.

Even the infamous interview between pro-russian propagandist Tucker Carlson and Vladimir Putin showed that Russia’s invasions of Ukraine in 2014 and 2022 had nothing to do with NATO. Instead, they stem from Putin’s obsession with the breakup of Kyivan Rus in the 12th century and the USSR in the 20th century. He cannot accept that Ukrainians are a distinct nation, so he seeks to erase Ukraine from existence.

Putin claimed to Tucker that Russia was founded in 862. However, he neglected to mention that at that time, Moscow was a swampy forest with no civilization, whereas Kyiv was a prosperous city.

Kyiv was ruled by Askold and Dyr beginning in 860, even before the Rurikid dynasty took control in 882. By 1100, Kyiv had become the fourth-largest city in Europe (larger than Paris or London in those days), while Moscow was not founded until 1147. The founder of Moscow is even buried in Kyiv, and visitors can still see his grave today.

The state was known as Rus. The Byzantine Emperor referred to it as “Rossia.” In the 13th century, the Pope called Danylo, the Ukrainian king, the “King of Rus,” while Alexander Nevsky was merely the “Duke of Suzdal.” Even in the 17th century, Ukrainian Hetman Bohdan Khmelnitskyi referred to himself as the “Hetman of Rus.”

Moscow was originally a colony of Rus and was called “Zalissia” (meaning “the land beyond the forest”). Moscow established its first state only in 1157 and identified themselves as Suzdalese (from the city of Suzdal).

Their first newspaper was titled “The News of the Moscovian State,” and coins from Peter I’s era were inscribed with “Moscovian ruble.” Ivan Fedorov, the first book printer of Moscovia, fled to Ukraine just two years after publishing his book and identified himself as Moscovian.

However, in 1721, after conquering the lands of ancient Rus, Moscovia officially renamed itself to Russia and adopted the two-headed eagle from Byzantium. They then fabricated a story that Rus “migrated” to Moscow to escape the Golden Horde.

Bottom line: As a political unit, Ukraine began in the 9th century as the Kingdom of Rus. Moscovia, on the other hand, began in 1157 as the Principality of Vladimir-Suzdal. Claiming that Russia began in Kyiv is as inaccurate as saying that Argentina began as the Kingdom of Castile in the 9th century or that the USA began as the Kingdom of Wessex in the 6th century.

……………..,..

Georgia’s elections were rigged. And here is the evidence.

Note the “russian tail” from ballot stuffing. And in some places 100 out of 100 votes voted for the ruling party.

Chart 1: Russian tail.

Every dot on the chart shows how many locations had X% of votes for the governing “Georgian Dream” party. Voting results typically follow a bell curve – this is called a normal distribution. Any deviation from this pattern requires explanation.

In urban areas, voting results are mostly around the average, suggesting fair elections there. Now, in the rural areas, there’s an unusual ‘tail’ on the right, called the ‘Russian tail.’

You can guess where that name comes from. We’ve seen similar russian interference in Belarus, Moldova and Ukraine. This pattern suggests rural ballots were stuffed or miscounted. We’ve seen video evidence of both on social media.

Approximately 400 locations show improbably high support for the government. It is virtually impossible for so many locations to naturally produce such a sharp spike.

Charts 2 and 3: Each dot is a voting location.

Y: % of registered voters who supported the party.
X: % of registered voters who voted (turnout).

Dots can’t go above the black diagonal line because you can’t get more votes than voters who showed up. If a candidate has 30% support, then typically for every 100 people who show up, about 30 vote for them.

That is why you expect dots to cluster around y=support% * turnout. Again, this is assuming a normal distribution. And this exactly what we see in urban areas. But in rural areas the ruling party has many data points deviating significantly from the trend line.

In hundreds of small and large locations, 100 voters show up, and exactly all 100 vote for the ruling party – a scenario that is almost impossible in fair elections.

These statistics provide solid evidence supporting the argument of ballot stuffing/miscounting. This manipulation occurred exclusively in rural areas, and we can say that the ruling party committed electoral fraud.