

Inside Ukraine’s secret drone battalion fighting Russia
In Ukraine, the frontline’s become the DRONELINE – with defenders dealing death from many miles away
13 Aug 2026
By DMYTRO DURNYEV IN KRAMATORSK and ANDREW JEHRING, CHIEF FOREIGN CORRESPONDENT
Nothing moves in the Ukrainian city once known as the Soviet Union’s ‘capital of glass’.
Kostiantynivka’s streets, buckled and deformed from years of artillery fire, missiles and bombs, are deserted. Its houses lie crumpled in ruins.
The factories that gave this faded industrial titan its moniker – and forged Lenin’s crystal sarcophagus and the ruby–red stars that still adorn the Kremlin – lie abandoned. Or so it seems.
‘Look at the screen,’ Volodymyr says, gesturing to live, full colour images from an observation drone that hovers hundreds of metres above in the eastern region of Donetsk.
‘It looks like an empty city – but it isn’t,’ whispers the 42–year–old Ukrainian drone pilot, who cannot be fully identified.
‘Our people are there. The Russians are there. Nobody dares show their face. That’s what war looks like now.’
Hiding from swarms of drones that map every inch of this war–ravaged hellscape, among the ruins and the foliage provided only during the summer months, Russian infiltration teams and Ukrainian defenders are engaged in a desperate fight that will decide the next turn of this war.
The Daily Mail was given rare access to the Seraphymy Unmanned Systems Battalion of the 104th Independent Territorial Defence Brigade in Donetsk last month.
Here we witnessed the battle for Kostiantynivka, one of four cities in the Donbas that make up Ukraine’s ‘fortress belt’.
Logistically vital, the belt stands between Moscow and its stated war aim to seize this region – and collectively forms the backbone of Ukraine’s remaining defences in Donetsk Oblast.
While many feel it is only a matter of time before Kostiantynivka falls (it has already been breached by up to 200 invaders), the manner in which Ukraine has harnessed drone innovation to slow Russia’s advance may offer a blueprint for how it repels them completely from the three remaining key cities.
In short, the revolution happening here will determine if this will be the last great fortress Russia takes – and, if that proves to be the case, could ultimately force Vladimir Putin to finally enter peace talks.
Kostiantynivka is the stuff of science fiction. Within the 15–mile ‘kill–zone’, vehicles, heavy armour and tanks have all but disappeared in the past 12 months.
Artillery, still vital, is heavily camouflaged and used sparingly. Too big. Too easily spotted. Here, where drones rule the skies, they often become ‘weapons of self–destruction’.
Instead, men move in ones and twos, from foxhole to foxhole, cellar to cellar. Detection from above is death.
The second human activity is identified, the entire building in which it is spotted is brought down by drones.
‘People are like ants,’ Volodymyr explains. ‘They’re hiding, crawling, constantly moving underground. The moment someone is spotted, 15 drones are on their way.’ Shaking his head, he adds: ‘It’s a terrible war.’
But Volodymyr is not among the ants. Thanks to cunning Ukrainian innovation, he is piloting his hulking 17in bomber drone from 37 miles away in a secret location the Daily Mail was invited to.
On larger drones such as this, Kyiv has attached Starlink terminals to give them a secure satellite connection that is largely unjammable.
It means bomber pilots who once sat within three miles of their machine have been moved out of the kill–zone.
This is a game–changer. Lest the peril for those who remain on the frontline needs spelling out further, beside Volodymyr’s observation screen and a tablet showing the tactical map of the city sits a third monitor which we were not allowed to photograph.
It carries the day’s operational picture. A Russian soldier has been located in a house. That is now the target.
Reconnaissance crews, drone pilots and commanders coordinate the strike in real time.
The operation unfolds in silence. The drone pilots continue talking over the radio. A bomber drone releases its munition. It fails to explode. The Russian soldier breaks cover, sprinting from the house into a patch of bushes.
A First Person View (FPV) kamikaze drone carrying a 1.5–kilogram high–explosive dives after him.
The onboard picture rushes into the foliage – and disappears. There are no cinematic explosions here. The screen simply goes black.
This is how soldiers meet their maker in the 21st century. Volodymyr is now free to go and make a cup of coffee. His radio sits within arm’s reach.

Whenever reconnaissance identifies another target in the ruins of Kostiantynivka, he returns to his workstation, takes control of his bomber drone and flies another mission.
This way of waging war is the brainchild of Mykhailo Fedorov, the recently sacked Defence Minister whose dismissal by Volodymyr Zelensky after just six months in post prompted nationwide protests earlier this year.
In his previous role as head of Ukraine’s Ministry of Digital Transformation, Fedorov ramped up drone procurement on an unprecedented scale in response to Russia’s 2022 full–scale invasion.
It was here that the concept of the Drone Line – using unmanned systems as the backbone of a front held by too little infantry – received institutional backing.
Given Ukraine has only a modest air force and a serious manpower challenge, the concept was to harness drones to preserve the lives of personnel and repel the Russians.
The unmanned systems would be used to establish a kill‑zone through which the enemy cannot advance without sustaining heavy losses.
When Fedorov was promoted to Defence Minister in January, the Drone Line program surged drastically, as he pumped 90 per cent of the weapons budget (not including the vast arsenals supplied by the West) into robotic warfare.
In Kostiantynivka, this has manifested in its most extreme form.
Russia had begun creeping assaults on the city and by May this year, as explained, some 200 men had successfully infiltrated.
Yet this city has not fallen. With Ukraine’s increased drone capabilities, invaders are identified and liquidated almost instantly.
‘What fascinates me is the war we’re fighting now,’ Serhii Kostynskyi, commander of the battalion, tells us.
‘The way we fought in 2022 and 2023 was terrifying. You spent your days being blanketed by artillery. The enemy never had to come within rifle range. They simply erased you with artillery and mortars. Then the tanks moved in. The Russians had an overwhelming advantage in artillery – it really was the First World War.
‘Now it’s different. Both we and they have an incredibly wide range of tools at our disposal.’
Within the kill–zone, infantrymen are scattered in teams as small as two or three. Hiding in dugouts and basements, they largely act as lookouts to call in drone strikes on any infiltrators.
Unmanned robotic vehicles support them with supplies and evacuate casualties.
Giving them cover are pilots, also hiding on the frontline, who fly FPV kamikaze drones on gossamer–like fiber–optic cables.
These drones, which have a range of about nine miles and cannot be jammed, are launched by a separate team of soldiers.
A year ago troops would drive into position, unload and speed away, but the proliferation of enemy observation and attack drones means that’s now impossible.
So the launchers enter in pairs, on foot. One pushes a handcart loaded with drones, batteries and ammunition. The other walks ahead, scanning the ground for mines with a drone detector around his neck.
Flying high above the kill–zone to avoid Russian electronic warfare are Ukraine’s Queen Bee motherships, whose pilots are several miles behind the frontline.
These carry swarms of smaller FPV strike craft and drop them up to 20 miles deep behind enemy lines.
Then there are the heavy bombers loaded with anti–tank mines and mortar shells connected to pilots like Volodymyr via Elon Musk’s Starlink dishes.
They use thermal imaging cameras to erase Russian armour and smash concrete fortifications while their crews are safely out of range.
Protecting both men and machines are interceptor drones – ultra–fast, highly agile quadcopters equipped by AI tracking, which take out surveillance drones and effectively blind the enemy.
The Drone Line is stitched together with a constant layer of fixed–wing AI reconnaissance drones that map every inch of the battlefield and feed it live into a battle management system.
Software automatically flags shifting pixels on digital screens, instantly identifying hidden Russian troops and automatically sending the coordinates to the nearest drone crew.
Russia possesses a roughly similar array of drones and this is an ongoing, evenly matched contest.
For the moment, Ukraine holds the advantage thanks to grassroots initiative and integration into Western technology – most importantly Starlink.
It is little wonder the men of Seraphymy believe a day may be coming soon when men are all but removed from the battlefield.
Volodymyr thinks soon every drone, not just heavy bombers, will operate through Starlink. Reconnaissance crews and FPV teams will no longer have to occupy exposed positions on the edge of Kostiantynivka’s kill–zone.
Instead, he is adamant they will work from rooms like his, with coffee machines, reliable internet connections and dozens of kilometres separating them from the battlefield.
He adds: ‘Within a year, infantry will all but disappear from the kill‑zone. Ground robots will carry weapons. Everyone will be sitting behind a control console, connected through Starlink, miles from the fighting.
‘Watch what happens over the next six months… everything will be done remotely. That’s the direction this war is heading.’
Despite Fedorov’s untimely removal, investment continues to pour into Ukraine’s drone units.
The 104th Independent Territorial Defence Brigade is already in the final stages of raising a second unmanned systems battalion.
Seraphymy, a territorial brigade, is one of the lowest rankings in the army, yet is receiving cutting–edge supplies. In just six months, the army is aiming to increase the number of drone crews sixfold.
Military expert Bob Seely, a partner in Ukraine–UK defence firm Trypillian, says: ‘We are witnessing a significant evolution of warfare. Sadly not enough soldiers and politicians in the West understand this.’
Moving pilots out of the kill–zone has long been ‘a Ukrainian priority’ and as a consequence we are now seeing ‘the rise of the machines’, Mr Seely, a former MP and British soldier, adds.
‘It is likely that war in the future will be largely fought by decision–making machines – overseen at least on our side by humans,’ he said.
‘It’s the quality and survivability of your machines that will dictate whether you win or lose.’
While observers marvel at Ukrainian advances, experts generally push back on claims that the infantry will disappear.
Anton Zemlianyi, Senior Analyst of Ukrainian Security and Cooperation Center, said such claims are ‘premature’ as control of territory ‘continues to depend on the infantry’.
Paraphrasing Mark Twain, Retired American Colonel Frank Sobchak, professor at the US Naval War College, said: ‘Reports of the infantry being outmoded are greatly exaggerated.’
Noting how often before this has been falsely predicted, he adds: ‘The infantry will always have a role on the battlefield, as there is no other element that can seize and hold terrain.’
While it is still unclear how NATO would fare in such a war, despite its vastly superior logistics and air power, the alliance is undoubtedly playing catch–up.
Ukraine is in the ascendancy but it has learnt this guarantees nothing. The pendulum could swing back as early as this autumn.
Russia is already rolling out technology it believes can jam Starlink. It is looking for alternatives to use itself offensively.
This is why Mr Zelensky’s removal of Mr Fedorov at such a critical juncture is so troubling.
Now the widely respected General Mykhailo Drapatyi has taken over as Commander–in–Chief while former head of intelligence Yevhenii Khmara is Fedorov’s acting replacement.
It must be hoped that they can quickly get to grips with this revolutionary battlefield as well as the Ministry of Defence, which spends more money than all the country’s other ministries combined.
The future of Kostiantynivka, and the rest of Ukraine, depends on it.
Original article, with many more photographs, can be seen here :

I found this to be desperately sad, almost overwhelming to read, yet the Ukrainian professionals just get on with their job, in unimaginably stressful circumstances.
I am also filled with rage at the appalling way that Ukraine’s allies have left them to fight alone against a gigantic fascist power that is about to swamp Ukraine with another half million cutthroats, degenerates and rapists.
Well-known DT commenter Carpe Jugulum said yesterday :
“If you had to name two leaders who genuinely could not possibly care less about their people Kim Jong-un and Putin would top the list. They each have ONE priority, themselves. The have both steered their countries into economic ruin by pouring $billions into their military forces. They are both thieves and murderers. Neither has any moral compass whatsoever. They are filth, and a perfect match. The presence of a North Korean army on the borders of Europe should not be tolerated. Russia is no immediate threat to NATO. Russia and North Korea IS an immediate threat. Putin should be told a North Korean army on European soil will not be tolerated. If he goes ahead that army should be sterilised by European airpower.”
“The presence of a North Korean army on the borders of Europe should not be tolerated.”
Absolutely right. It’s ridiculous and shameful that this is being allowed to go ahead without pushback.
NFZ now!
Robin Horsfall yesterday:
In 2023 I wrote ‘If Trump isn’t a Russian asset, he does everything a Russian asset would do.’ Now, his obedience to the will of Putin cannot be questioned by any reasonable person who pays attention to his actions.
Two years of diplomatic engagements between Trump and Putin have left Ukrainian and European diplomats in no doubt Trump and his current team accepted Russia’s rationale for war; a war which Putin launched in 2022 to conquer Ukraine and replace its democratic government; a war which in turn precipitated the deadliest conflict in Europe since World War II.
Only four weeks ago in Ankara, Trump agreed to allow Ukraine to manufacture Patriot missiles under licence. Now, after a conversation with Putin he says, ‘I’m not so sure.’ This so-called change of heart will not come as a surprise to President Zelensky, it was probably expected. Unlike most of the US Republican Party, Zelensky has a memory more than five seconds long. He knows a traitor when he sees one.
European governments including the UK, no longer share sensitive real time intelligence with the USA. To do so would give the same intelligence directly to Russia. One confidential unmonitored call between Trump and the Russian premier and the intelligence becomes useless. Trump has complained several times about not being informed of Ukrainian missions. One example among many was the successful attack on Russia’s shadow fleet in the Sea of Azov last month.
Trump came to power for the second time with the obvious assistance and influence of Russia. Since then, he has done everything he can to slow or defeat Ukraine’s war efforts. When Trump won the Presidential elections for the second time, the people of Russia celebrated Trump’s ascendancy as a Russian victory. Russia’s failing campaign against Ukraine suddenly had new hope. Perhaps now, they thought, victory could be pulled from the jaws of defeat.
Since coming to power Trump has delayed or halted Ukrainian aid at every opportunity despite clearly stated views in national polls that the majority of US citizens want the US to assist Ukraine. A 2025, US Gallup poll showed by a 66% margin Americans opposed Ukraine giving up territory to Russia, but the dictator of the USA drives forward regardless of public opinion.
Trump temporarily suspended real time intelligence which allowed Ukraine to hold territory in Kursk Oblast. Ukraine was compelled to return to its own borders.
Trump halted all aid to Ukraine on the grounds that it needed to be paid for. This demand was countered by European nations who agreed to pay for the much-needed military aid and then forwarded it to Ukraine. This process continues.
Trump sent incompetent ‘negotiators’ in the guise of Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner to do what Trump calls ‘deals’ with Russia, forcing themselves onto the world stage as mediators without asking whether they could represent Ukraine. Witkoff’s obsequiousness to Putin made the free world cringe.
Steve Witkoff, a former real estate developer, and Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law shuttled between Moscow and Florida. Unwilling to enter Ukraine, they forced Ukrainian diplomats to come to them and meet them in Florida in Mar a Lago, where they attempted to force a surrender plan onto Ukraine. They claimed the framework was based on a 28-point document ‘drafted by Americans with consultation from the Russians.’ That was a lie, in fact, it was an exact copy of Russia’s maximalist demands word for word.
Ukraine’s refusal to submit to US/Russian pressure tactics resulted in the now famous ‘You haven’t got the cards’ fiasco when Trump and Vance attempted to openly intimidate President Zelensky on camera, to the disgust of Ukraine supporters across the world. If the coalition of the willing needed extra motivation to assist Ukraine then this abusive performance produced it. It was an international disgrace that will be recalled in meetings with any future US governments who might claim they can be trusted.
Trump imposed a rare earth minerals deal onto Ukraine (under duress) in return for the resumption of intelligence support. Without this vital intelligence Ukraine could not counter Russian assaults in real time by using precision against Russian mass attacks.
Trump arranged for Putin to meet him in Alaska for a one to one, red carpet meeting despite Putin having been declared a war criminal by the International Criminal Court. The USA is not a signatory to the court and is not subject to its decisions, unless of course it suits them, as it does when they complain about Iran.
Not long after the meeting, members of the Russian government complained Trump had gone back on agreements made during said meeting. Agreements only Trump seemed to be aware of. There was no record kept; no report to Congress and no approval. This was dictatorship in its most obvious form and yet Congress stuck its head in the sand and hoped it would all go away if they ignored it.
Trump recently declared an approved military aid package of $400 million, a relatively small amount in any war budget. Trump now wants to extend that payment over four years.
Lindsay Graham’s increased sanctions program against Russia was approved by both houses of Congress but will still need to be signed off by Trump. With Trump’s famous caddy now in the hereafter, this will never happen.
Trump has destroyed the NATO alliance. When asked if he would follow article 5 of the NATO charter he said, ‘It depends’ and it does depend. It depends on what will benefit Trump and Putin. NATO, the greatest and most successful defensive alliance in history, is now history. There is a new alliance growing under the leadership of Europe and Canada. The free world understands it must replace the US nuclear umbrella with a canopy of their own.
On a call with European leaders in late 2025, Emmanuel Macron said, ‘There is a possibility that the U.S. will betray Ukraine on the issue of territory without clarity on security guarantees.’ (Der Spiegel).
In December 2025, Trump’s administration published a National Security Strategy which claimed ‘Europe has unrealistic expectations for a Ukrainian victory’ and suggested the USA should ‘work to cultivate political resistance to Europe’s current trajectory.’ There could be no clearer statement of the USA directly opposing European support for Ukraine and Trump’s support of Russia. There it was in writing, and yet within forty-eight hours it became old news.
Pundits, politicians, and experts all agree Trump can and will obstruct Ukraine’s ability to defend itself at every opportunity. Trump balances what he can get away with against what the US public will tolerate. He floods the media with distractions and outrageous demands and successfully removes the Ukraine agenda out of the media limelight. Ignorance is bliss in the USA and Ukraine is a long way from Alabama.
Trump is a Russian asset, that is as clear as the fake tan on his face. He is a traitor operating in full public view. He is under the clear and obvious control of Putin and will remain so until his demise. Trump continues to give hope to Putin and the Russian populace for some face-saving victory in Ukraine.
The war continues to drag on as a direct result of Trump’s support of Russia; yet despite all these obstacles, Ukraine, in combination with its true friends, has gained the momentum. Russia is losing the military campaign but equally important it is losing the economic war.
By the end of 2026, Trump could well be an irrelevance on the world stage. It would be of benefit to everyone if he became an irrelevance in the USA first.
Slava Ukraini!
I write to fight.
Robin Horsfall
Money, ideology, kompromat, or all three?
Who knows?
The bastard works for ruZZian interests and hires exclusively putler-rimmmers and Ukraine-haters. That’s a fact.
In an article in the DT today by Allister Heath entitled “This catastrophic split on the Right risks handing power to terrifying new enemies”, he wrote :
“Donald Trump’s protectionism has been a disaster, his utterances feel increasingly detached from reality and he appears to have lost his nerve over Iran.
Maga’s pathologies are nothing compared to what will come next if the Tucker Carlson-Candace Owens-Nick Fuentes tendencies take over the Republican Party. Giorgia Meloni has proved unable to transform Italy. France’s Marine Le Pen’s proto-socialist economic agenda is predicated on the lie that France’s retirement policies are affordable.”
And :
“The Right’s failure is a tragedy in three acts. The rot started when Tories and Bush Republicans assumed that history had ended, that their side had triumphed, that there was no point fighting for Reagan-Thatcher capitalism any longer.”
From the KI :
Kyiv and its international partners have a joint plan to force Moscow to end its war, President Volodymyr Zelensky said on Aug. 12 as peace talks stall and Russia continues strikes on Ukrainian cities.
“(Russian President Vladimir) Putin does not want to stop this war, but he will stop it. We have a plan,” Zelensky said at the annual Ukrainian Youth Forum.
The strategy rests on joint pressure on the Russian leader, Zelensky said, without disclosing further details.
The president also underscored the necessity for the Ukrainian army to hold the defenses and continue strikes inside Russian territory, while noting that Kyiv’s partners should work to boost the country’s air defenses.
Zelensky said in his evening address on Aug. 11 that Ukrainian negotiators had passed their proposals to end the war to the U.S. side.
The comments come as Washington-led peace talks have been deadlocked for months, with both Kyiv and Moscow remaining far apart on territorial issues.
Russia has repeatedly rejected Ukraine’s calls for a ceasefire along the current front lines and demanded to be handed the entire Donbas region in Ukraine’s east — a non-starter for Kyiv.
In spite of this, the Ukrainian leadership hopes that the active phase of the war could end before the winter season, which would likely bring a fresh wave of strikes against Ukrainian energy infrastructure.