Oct 7, 2026
The idea that peace comes from strength is not a new one, and dates back to at least the Roman general Vegetius. However, it appears to have been forgotten by some on the Right.
Lessons from History for Tucker Carlson
Oct 7, 2026
The idea that peace comes from strength is not a new one, and dates back to at least the Roman general Vegetius. However, it appears to have been forgotten by some on the Right.
A concise 15 minute lecture from Sir Jacob that pulls together various historical threads with events today.
It’s true that in the U.K. we also have vile, despicable liars in the media who push kremkrapp. George Galloway, Peter Hitchens and David Icke come immediately to mind. The difference is that they cannot command even a tiny fraction of the support that Fucker Karlsonov has built.
Karlsonov is primarily a putinaZi, but he is also a fan of izlamonazi Iran. Likely because he is a rabid Jew-hater and lover of Adolf Hitler.
It is chastening to remember that Krasnov used to admire Karlsonov so much that he wanted him as his VP. In the end he got someone of equal evil : JD VanZkov.
Karlsonov and Ivan Muskovy were the two key arseholes that got Krasnov elected.
Karlsonov only broke from Krasnov because of Iran.
So whenever you listen to the squeaky-voiced nazi prattling on with his hateful lies, you need to remind yourself of this fact.
Marijn Markus :
🇩🇪 If you’d rather 𝐥𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐏𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐧 than fight in a war, you forget that Putin would force you to fight and diє in the next war.
“It’s better to live in Germany under Putin’s rule than to fight for Germany,” said 18-year-old student Jan Wagner.
A child at that age can be forgiven from holding such shortsighted opinions. But we shouldn’t be so forgiving towards older adults who argue the same.
German students have protested against the return of military service, with demonstrations announced across 90 cities. Other arguments include:
“It’s better to flee than to fight.”
“We don’t want to be cannon fodder.”
“It’s better to live under occupation than to fight.”
And the most revealing:
“Ukraine should have surrendered instead of defending itself with human lives.”
There is one rather important problem with this logic.
Russian occupation does 𝐧𝐨𝐭 spare you from war.
Russia forcibly mobilized men from occupied parts of Ukraine, particularly the occupied Donetsk and Luhansk regions, to fight in its war. Like they did to occupied Georgian and Chechnya before. Many were sent into combat with little preparation and limited ability to refuse.
So “I’d rather live under Putin than fight Putin” doesn’t mean you avoid fighting.
🍖 It means you surrender today, lose the ability to decide for yourself, and get used as cannon fodder tomorrow.
Occupation is not peace.
It is handing someone else the power to decide which war you fight, and whether your life is expendable.
Quote is from focus.de
Cemil Kerimoglu :
Johann Wadephul, the German foreign minister, cuts through the illusion that Russia’s advocates and the chorus calling for “peace” keep selling Ukraine: that once Russians occupy a territory, ordinary life simply carries on and everything will be fine.
Behind the front line, the reality is different. Systematic child abductions, torture, murder, rape, expropriation. And alongside all of that, the population being replaced by arrivals from Russia, Central Asia, and the Caucasus. Hand these territories over to Russia — or, worse still, more of Ukraine — and you consign the people living there to exactly that daily existence. To Russian savageries happening en masse and every day – essentially, genocide.
Is this the kind of “peace” these morally depraved creatures wish for Ukrainians? Is this the way to “save lives”, as they preach, by refusing Ukraine weapons?
That Russia’s supporters and the peaceniks still keep looking past all this and plead for “peace” with Russia is sickening. The documented atrocities do not fit their comfortable view of the world, so they brush them aside. Anyone who ignores these Russian savageries and keeps sympathizing with Russia has forfeited any claim to morality.
The decent and morally upright position is not wishing for peace or an end to hostilities, but for the total destruction of Russia. This is axiomatic.
Russia must destroyed. Whatever it takes. Russia delenda est.