“Frau Myrotvorka” is as responsible for the war in Ukraine as Putin

07.07.2025

A few days ago, former German Chancellor Angela Merkel spoke in the courtyard of Schwerin Castle at a panel discussion on Russia’s aggressive war against Ukraine, the war in Gaza, and NATO’s new goal of increasing military spending, North German Radio (Norddeutscher Rundfunk, NDR) reported.

Angela Merkel (CDU) deliberately distanced herself from Defense Minister Boris Pistorius (SPD) in one statement. She said, referring to Russia’s aggressive war against Ukraine: “We must become capable of peace through military force.” Pistorius had previously said that Germany must become “capable of war.”

In her interview with NDR radio, Merkel stressed the importance of diplomacy in Russia’s aggressive war against Ukraine. The best way to prevent attacks is by developing a deterrent effect while simultaneously trying to maintain diplomatic contacts, the former chancellor said: “This is how we survived the Cold War, and this is how we must survive the future one.” It is good that people are talking to Russia again. “Without talks, this war will definitely not end,” Merkel emphasized.

As we can see, Angela Merkel is not changing her rhetoric. She is not at all concerned about what kind of talks are being held with Moscow. The main thing for her is that they are being held. Nor does she care that no talks will ever stop the war of the Russian Federation. We remember well Merkel’s “peacemaking” talks with Putin, as well as what they ultimately led to for Ukraine.

And every time, after the terrible shelling of Kyiv and Ukraine by the Russian imperialists, the former German Chancellor Angela Merkel is mentioned. Who is just as responsible for Putin’s war in Ukraine as her accomplice – the Russian dictator. After all, it was she, at the Bucharest summit in 2008, who blocked, together with French President Nicolas Sarkozy, Ukraine’s accession to NATO.

Now this lady is on a “well-deserved” political pension, and from time to time tells the media that her decision was the right one. But for us, Ukrainians, this person played a very sinister role. By playing along with Putin, she opened the way for him to attack the Ukrainian state. And it is obvious that the enemy who came to kill you cannot be appeased with any words. He can only be destroyed.

Today, hundreds of thousands of deaths of Ukrainian citizens are on her conscience. And it is very important that this “Frau Myrotvorka” bears full responsibility for her sinister decisions regarding Ukraine. After all, she blocked our state’s ability to enter the security zone provided by membership in the North Atlantic Alliance. By doing so, she sent a clear signal to Moscow that Ukraine is now left alone with the Russian Federation.

This person from the past did not give Ukrainians a chance for a peaceful life, instead she played along with her friend from the Kremlin, cynically acting in his geopolitical interests. Since she was first elected to the position of Chancellor in 2005, Angela Merkel has become a very valuable political asset for Putin. After all, she did everything in her power to critically reduce Germany’s armed forces, and by closing all nuclear power plants, she made the Federal Republic of Germany almost completely dependent on Russia for gas and oil supplies. This made it impossible for the Germans to jump off the Russian Federation’s gas and oil needle.

It is also worth recalling that Frau Merkel promoted and defended the need to lay and operate the German-Russian pipelines “Nord Stream-1” and “Nord Stream-2”. Which should have been dismantled long ago, since the Kremlin has still not abandoned plans to resuscitate this energy threat to a united Europe.

And by making the North Atlantic Alliance vulnerable to the whims of the enemy, which Russia was and remains after the end of the Cold War, Merkel thereby showed Putin that his demands will be listened to. And Moscow can decide who can be accepted into the Alliance and who does not have the right to collective defense. Although NATO was created precisely to defend Europe from the USSR.

However, this Frau believed that NATO membership would “harm” Ukraine. Now we have clearly seen what tragic bloody consequences this person’s decisions had for the Ukrainian people. Although this pro-Russian politician of such a high rank could not have been unaware that if Ukraine had been a member of NATO, protected by Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty, and a member of the European Union, protected by the mutual defense clause (Article 42.7) of the Treaty on European Union, then on February 24, 2022, Putin would never have dared to invade Ukrainian lands.

For almost 30 long years, Ukraine was kept on the threshold of NATO and the European Union, thereby provoking Putin to attack. After all, in this case, Moscow’s logic was as follows: if Europe does not involve Ukraine in European structures, then it, like us, does not consider it a full-fledged state. And this means that there are no obstacles to invasion. How else to explain that all European states were allowed to join NATO and the EU, but for Ukraine they constantly invented fables about its unreadiness for accession?

Dictators do not understand the language of diplomacy – only the language of force. And now it is becoming obvious to most European leaders that all attempts to appease the Russian despot were futile and a complete failure. And if Ukraine is not helped and Putin is allowed to seize its territories, then they will definitely be next. Because if Ukraine falls, Europe will fall.

It is clear that few politicians are willing to admit their mistakes and wrongdoings. But often after retirement, on the threshold of eternity, they become a little more honest. But this does not apply to Merkel, who during her reign and after it, did not want to notice the corruption and crimes against humanity of Putin’s totalitarian regime of kleptocrats. Her mistakes and misconceptions about reality strengthened Putin’s intentions to use force, and paved the way for all his war crimes against Ukraine.

Merkel’s actions towards Putin indicate either political inferiority or her blatant involvement in serving Moscow’s political whims. It is illogical that a person who, thanks to her position, had all the information she needed from the German intelligence services, and who once lived in the GDR under Soviet control, did not understand the danger that Putin posed.

Angela Merkel’s political approaches are very reminiscent of the position of Neville Chamberlain, the Prime Minister of Great Britain from 1937 to 1940. He also never took responsibility for his actions, but appeasing dictators always leads to war. If the former Chancellor did not understand the inevitable result of her “peacemaking” activities and flirtation with the Russian dictator, then she was always inadequate for the position she held for so long.

Merkel is a disgrace to Germany. While working as Chancellor, she openly served the interests of Putin and the Russian Federation. For which the “Frau Peacemaker” must suffer a well-deserved punishment. In Germany itself, this issue has been raised repeatedly, but it has still not found its logical continuation.

Merkel’s predecessor, Schroeder, received almost $1 million a year from Russian-controlled energy companies. This evil seems to be deeply rooted among the political class in Germany. Therefore, it is unlikely that Berlin is interested in seeing “political Merkelism” continue in their country in the future.

After all, unpunished evil is an invitation for other European politicians to work for Russia’s interests, knowing full well in advance that they will get nothing for it. Of course, different options can be considered. But now a solution is emerging that could simplify the situation that arose with Frau Merkel. 

For betraying the interests of the German people, anti-German activities, and the desire to help Russian enemies, deprive Angela Merkel, as well as another former Chancellor, Gerhard Schroeder, of German citizenship. With the subsequent possible deportation of these individuals to the Russian Federation.

Because if you love Russia so much and work for its interests, then move there and join the company of Bashar Assad, Viktor Yanukovych, and other political vassals of dictator Putin who have burned out. Evil must be punished.

After all, Russia’s victory in the war in Ukraine would mean the collapse of NATO and the EU, as intimidation and interference in elections would put an end to democracy in Europe.

And when Ukraine can win this war, Putinism and racism will naturally collapse. After all, the Russian-Ukrainian war is a test not only for Ukraine and Europe. It is a test for the entire collective West and democratic civilization.

https://news.obozrevatel.com/ukr/abroad/frau-mirotvorka-vidpovidalna-za-vijnu-v-ukraini-yak-i-putin.htm

5 comments

  1. Merkel is indeed one aspect that made this horrible war possible. Being in bed with the vampire was deplorable and her worst mistake of all. But, her missteps were wide-ranging, starting with internal affairs to the EU, China, and NATO. Merkel was a major reason why Britain had their Brexit, and it was she who flooded this continent with trash from Afghanistan and Syria and other places. She has made so many blunders, it’s hard to find a starting point. She was definitely Germany’s worst chancellor, followed closely by that other dirt bag, Schröder.
    Merkel has never admitted to any of her many mistakes. She either ignored them, downplayed them, or found an idiot to blame. But, history does not forget. She can deny her guilt as much as she wants, she will be seen for what she is for all times to come: an evil and horrible leader.
    Having said this, we certainly cannot forget others that are to blame for this war. Unfortunately, every major Western nation has them; Clinton, Obama, Biden, Trump, Major, Hollande, and others. They all have blood on their hands.

    • Some while back, I tried to research what John Major said after the signing of Budapest. I could find nothing except a sentence from his autobiography. Even that has disappeared since then, but from memory, I think he referred to his signature “providing nuclear security” for Ukraine.
      I believe he was conned by Clinton; as the Ukrainians were.
      Clinton has sort of admitted culpability; albeit in a careful, lawyerly way.
      Where I am angry with Major is that he seems to have deliberately kept his trap shut on this subject.
      He’s now 82 and the time is right for him to be interviewed under caution by the security services to find out what he knew, before it’s too late.
      I am guessing that he refuses interviews with investigative journalists, otherwise we would have seen one.
      But there is no doubt that the U.S. and UK behaved disgracefully in 2014, because they simply ignored the Memorandum.
      Therefore they owe it to the Ukrainians in this, the hour of their greatest need, to bring this war to a conclusion and on terms that retain Ukraine’s status as an independent unitary state.

  2. This dirty skank is a ruZZian agent, as her father was before.
    She colluded with Sarkozy, Hollande and putler.
    All four need to be swinging.

  3. Man! Why you always come up with disgusting photos or comments during my lunch break? That photo needs to be censored! 😤😂

Enter comments here: