British soldiers in Ukraine helping fire missiles, Olaf Scholz reveals

German chancellor criticised for ‘flagrant abuse of intelligence’ that could endanger UK personnel on the ground and help the Russians

 BRUSSELS CORRESPONDENT 

and BERLIN CORRESPONDENT

28 February 2024 •

Germany was accused of a “flagrant abuse of intelligence” after revealing that British soldiers are supporting Ukrainian forces launching long-range Storm Shadow missiles.

Olaf Scholz said on Monday that he would not deliver the Taurus, Berlin’s equivalent of the Storm Shadow, as it would require soldiers assisting on the ground, citing the UK and French approach with their own systems. Mr Scholz argued that following the UK would make Germany a “participant in the war”.

The comments were seen as endangering British military and diplomatic personnel on the ground.

Tobias Ellwood, the former chairman of the Commons defence committee, said: “This is a flagrant abuse of intelligence deliberately designed to distract from Germany’s reluctance to arm Ukraine with its own long-range missile system. This will no doubt be used by Russia to racket up the escalator ladder.”

Mr Scholz was also criticised by German opposition MPs.

“The chancellor’s statement regarding France and Britain’s alleged involvement in operating long-range cruise missiles used in Ukraine is completely irresponsible,” Norbert Rottgen, a senior MP from Angela Merkel’s former ruling party, the CDU.

Mr Scholz is under mounting pressure to deliver the long-range missile to disrupt Russia’s supply lines and prevent Moscow taking further territory.

He said on Monday that German soldiers could not follow their British and French peers in “the way of target control and accompanying target control”. The Storm Shadow is co-produced by the UK and France.

“German soldiers can at no point and in no place be linked with the targets that this system [the Taurus] reaches. Not even in Germany,” Mr Scholz said.

Britain is known to provide intelligence on Russian targets but it is unclear what level of support is given to Ukrainian troops firing its missiles on the ground.

On Tuesday, the UK Government announced it had a “small number” of soldiers deployed inside Ukraine, specifying only that some were involved in medical training.

Mr Scholz’s speculation on the role played by British troops in Ukraine has heightened concern for the safety of diplomats and other personnel stationed in the country, defence sources told The Telegraph.

It has also increased the threat of potential Russian overseas intelligence operations on British soil, the sources added.

Storm Shadow missile

The RAF’s long-range cruise missile is armed with a specialist penetrating warhead designed to destroy hardened and buried targets from long range. It is made to be fitted to Western-made fighter jets but can be adapted for Soviet-era aircraft

technologies than the British Storm Shadow and French Scalp cruise missiles delivered last year.

The German missile, which has a range of 310 miles, could easily strike politically sensitive targets, such as Moscow or the Kerch bridge linking Russia with occupied Crimea.

Justin Crump, chief executive of Sibylline, an intelligence consultancy, said: “British support to Ukraine is hardly news to Moscow given repeated leaks, but this has previously been veiled in ambiguity – itself drawing on a trick from Russia’s own playbook.

A Russian warship is damaged by a Ukrainian attack on a Black Sea port using long-range cruise missiles
A Russian warship is damaged by a Ukrainian attack on a Black Sea port using long-range cruise missiles CREDIT: UNPIXS

“[Mr] Scholz though has more clearly pierced this veil. His assertion is a gift to Russian propagandists, already forming a key part of Russia’s effort to undermine Nato cohesion and support for Kyiv during this critical period ahead of US and UK elections.”

“More immediately, it will drive Russia to redouble efforts to target foreign forces present in Ukraine and make inflated claims of losses.”

Mr Scholz has a deep mistrust that Ukraine would ignore his orders not to strike those targets, analysts said.

“It has become very clear that the reason why he is not in favour of delivering Taurus is because he fundamentally does not trust the Ukrainians to use those missiles in a way that [does] not go against what he perceives as Germany’s interests,” Fabian Hoffman, a doctoral research fellow at the Oslo Nuclear Project, said.

“[Mr] Scholz is absolutely frightened that any of these Taurus missiles could be used in an attack against a politically sensitive target, either in Ukraine or Russia.

“Simply the theoretical ability to strike targets as far as Moscow with German weapons systemscreates a blockage in the chancellor’s head… a massive fear of escalation potential and the consequences this could have for Germany.”

Experts say that Germany could overcome its fears of escalatory strikes by pre-programming donated Taurus missiles to prevent such attacks.

The US is known to have installed geo-blocking software on its Himars rocket launchers sent to Ukraine, preventing Kyiv’s forces from firing into Russian soil with the weapons system.

6 comments

  1. “Tobias Ellwood, the former chairman of the Commons defence committee, said: “This is a flagrant abuse of intelligence deliberately designed to distract from Germany’s reluctance to arm Ukraine with its own long-range missile system. This will no doubt be used by Russia to racket up the escalator ladder.”

    What can you say to that?
    Thanks a lot Scholz, you fucking wanker.

    • The U.K. has a large, purpose-built, expensive embassy in Moscow and a consulate in Ekaterinburg.
      I think it’s time to prepare a total and permanent withdrawal and a final break off of diplomatic relations with the cauldron of devilry.
      We can then kick out ALL putinaZis from the U.K. and seize all their property and assets.

      • Really “completely irresponsible”, I fully agree with Norbert Röttgen on this. And who knows if it’s even true? This may be based on flawed intelligence by the BND, or truth may be that Ukraine employs some former british maintenance technicians as mercenaries, which would be according to international law. No matter how much Scholz may feel under pressure for stubbornly refusing delivery of these weapons, this breach of security is unacceptable. Personally, I think he should be impeached and replaced in a “vote of no confidence” for this, but I won’t hold my breath. 😡

        Btw, I don’t believe for a minute that it shouldn’t have been possible to train Ukrainian technicians on this in a few weeks, so this new excuse doesn’t hold water anyway.

  2. It is clear that the West needs to help Ukraine more than it is doing. We need to help them destroy the Kerch bridge, and cluster bomb wherever the Tupolev’s are based. As an American, I am embarrassed by the lack of leadership currently gripping our Congress. How many instances of dead innocents do we need before our moral red lines are crossed. Why do we exist at all, if we can’t rise and defend what is right and good and worth fighting for?

  3. Once again Germany and Scholz prove they cannot be trusted or relied upon as “allies” of Ukraine. What in the world is this idiot doing either releasing actual intelligence which is detrimental to Ukraine and it allies or releasing inaccurate or incomplete information to try to improve his personal political position? Beyond belief but so typical of our so called “leaders” of the free West.

Enter comments here: