WP: New danger for Ukraine: Taking Israel’s side in war against Hamas and Gaza

October 29, 2023

People in Kyiv walk past a screen displaying the Israeli flag on Oct. 8, the day after Hamas’s surprise attack on Israel. (Sergey Dolzhenko/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock)

KYIV — Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s immediate and forceful support for Israel in its fight against Hamas has imperiled almost a year of concerted efforts by Kyiv to win the support of Arab and Muslim nations in its war against Russia.

Zelensky’s early statements backing Israel after the surprise attack by Hamas, in which more than 1,400 Israelis were killed, helped Ukraine stay in the international spotlight, and placed it firmly on the side of the United States.

Zelensky’s position also drew attention to the increasingly close relationship between Russia and Iran, which is a main sponsor of Hamas, a sworn enemy of Israel, and also an important supplier of drones and other weapons for Moscow.

Hamas and Russia are the “same evil, and the only difference is that there is a terrorist organization that attacked Israel and here is a terrorist state that attacked Ukraine,” Zelensky said in a speech to NATO’s Parliamentary Assembly on Oct. 9.

But with Israel’s military operation set to enter its fourth week, and Palestinian civilian casualties mounting, the war in Gaza is posing one of the most difficult diplomatic tests for Ukraine since Russia’s invasion in February 2022.

Countries like Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar, which at times have provided crucial support to Ukraine, have accused the West of double standards in Gaza, alluding to the broad condemnation of civilian deaths in Ukraine compared with the muted criticism of Israel.

Tension with Muslim and Arab nations, however, is just one risk facing Kyiv, which must now also contend with the world’s attention shifting largely to new war in the Middle East, as well as competing demands for U.S. military support at a time when House Republicans just elected a new speaker, Mike Johnson (La.), who has opposed sending additional aid to Ukraine.

Some experts noted that Israel had already made clear it was not going to reciprocate with greater support for Ukraine.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky speaks by phone with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Oct. 8 to express Kyiv’s support for Israel. (Ukrainian Presidential Press Office/ AFP/Getty Images)

Randa Slim, an expert in peace-building at the Middle East Institute, said Israel had no choice but to maintain its relationship with Moscow, in part because of Russia’s control over Syria, and she pointed out that Israel had rejected Zelensky’s offer to visit after the Hamas attack.

Zelensky’s pro-Israel position “did not make sense,” Slim said, adding that many Arab and Muslim countries see more similarities between Israel and Russia — as aggressive military powers — than they do between Israel and Ukraine.

“This is where the Arab region is,” she said. “They are not going to accept what Biden says, comparing Russia and Hamas. They are more comparing Russia and Israel as far as death toll and as far as targeting civilians.”

Zelensky, she said, could win more friends if he was “ready to say what Russia is doing in Ukraine is what Israel is doing in Gaza.” But, she added, “I don’t see Ukraine ready to do that or willing to do that.”

Just as Russian President Vladimir Putin initially offered no direct condolences to Israel and no firm rebuke of Hamas, Zelensky was slow to speak about the need to protect Palestinian civilians in Gaza as Israel stepped up retaliatory airstrikes.

When news of the Hamas attack first hit, Zelensky and members of his team compared Hamas to Russia, saying Ukrainians had “a special understanding about what is happening” to Israelis. (There are large numbers of Ukrainian and Russian immigrants living in Israel.)

Only 10 days later did Zelensky indirectly allude to the bombardment of Gaza by calling for the need to protect civilians and for de-escalation.

Meanwhile, Zelensky has steered clear of criticizing Israeli strikes, despite the deaths in Gaza of thousands of Palestinian civilians and at least 21 Ukrainian citizens.

The foreign ministers of Turkey and Qatar, which have played instrumental roles in negotiating between Ukraine and Russia on issues like prisoner-of-war exchanges and Russia’s blockade of Ukrainian grain exports, issued a joint statement alleging Western hypocrisy.

“It is not permissible to condemn the killing of civilians in one context and justify it in another,” said Qatar’s Mohammed bin Abdulrahman al-Thani. Turkey’s Hakan Fidan added that the West’s failure to condemn the killings in Gaza “constitutes a very serious double standard.”

In an interview with CNN, Queen Rania of Jordan also offered sharp criticism: “Are we being told that it is wrong to kill a family, an entire family, at gunpoint, but it’s okay to shell them to death?”

Other experts said Zelensky’s efforts to draw comparisons were unlikely to resonate with Arab countries.

Ukraine “has never been at the forefront” for the Arab world, said Kristian Ulrichsen a fellow at Rice University who has written on Ukraine-Arab relations. “It is a conflict that does not concern them.”

Ulrichsen added, “Israel is taking up so much bandwidth that I don’t think anybody in the Middle East really is thinking about Ukraine right now.”

This weekend, Ukraine was scheduled to host a third round of talks aimed at fostering global support for its “peace plan” — which calls for a unilateral withdrawal of Russian troops from occupied Ukrainian territory and full restoration of Ukraine’s territorial sovereignty.

Unlike at the first Ukraine peace formula meeting in August, which was hosted by Saudi Arabia in Jeddah and attended by delegates from almost all the major unaligned powers, it was unclear if Saudi officials would attend this weekend’s event in Malta.

Zelensky spoke Monday with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, and in a readout of the call issued by Riyadh, there was no mention of the Malta conference or further help for Ukraine.

China, which in recent days has joined Russia in calling for a return to a two-state solution to settle the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, was not attending the Malta event, Bloomberg News reported.

Turkey was planning to send a delegation to Malta, but in recent days Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has spoken out forcefully against Israel and has described Hamas as a resistance movement — a stark contrast to Zelensky’s stated positions.

With Russia stepping up attacks on the eastern front, Ukraine can hardly afford to lose any friends. This is especially true given increasing opposition by Republicans in Congress to sending more aid to Ukraine.

President Biden has proposed an additional $60 billion in assistance for Ukraine, and in a recent speech tied that to increased funding for Israel and for strengthening border protection in the United States.

But the White House must now deal with Johnson, the new House speaker, who has repeatedly voted against further Ukraine funding and told Fox News he intends to separate funding for Ukraine from the assistance to Israel.

Johnson has said Washington will not abandon Ukraine but has questioned the White House’s ultimate goals. Meanwhile, in Europe, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, who recently met Putin on the sidelines of a conference in China, is trying to shoot down a 50 billion-euro aid proposal for Ukraine from the European Union.

The E.U. package will be voted on in December as part of the bloc’s 2023-2027 budget and requires the unanimity of the 27 member countries to be approved.

Tymofiy Mylovanov, a former Ukrainian economy minister, expressed confidence thatZelensky’s administration would come up with a plan to re-boost international support for Ukraine and maintain attention on the war in the short to medium term.

Ukraine’s Foreign Ministry, the Ukrainian presidential administration and a spokesperson for Zelensky did not respond to requests for comment on what their plan might entail.

Ukraine, meanwhile, has been preparing for the possibility that U.S. support will taper off, according to Orysia Lutsevych, director of the Ukraine program at Chatham House, a London-based think tank.

Ukraine’s “Plan B” — evidenced by recent joint ventures with German and Turkish arms companies as well as talks with British and American manufacturers — is to distance itself as much as possible from external foreign politics, Lutsevych said.

“If America completely abandons Ukraine, it would be very difficult,” Lutsevych said. “But Ukraine will keep fighting with the resources it has on its own and it has from European allies.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/10/29/ukraine-israel-gaza-russia-support/

9 comments

  1. “Some experts noted that Israel had already made clear it was not going to reciprocate with greater support for Ukraine.”

    If this is true, then I don’t understand Zelensky’s stance on Israel. I admit that I had a slight hope that Israel would turn its back on mafia land, since it seems that it is at least partially responsible for the Hamas attacks, and give proper support to Ukraine.
    But…

    “Randa Slim, an expert in peace-building at the Middle East Institute, said Israel had no choice but to maintain its relationship with Moscow, in part because of Russia’s control over Syria, and she pointed out that Israel had rejected Zelensky’s offer to visit after the Hamas attack.”

    I’ll disagree about Israel having no choice. Everyone has a choice. It’s Israel’s coziness with mafia land that ushered in the deep problems in the first place that the country now faces. You can’t have a normal relationship with a fascist country that’s also a crime syndicate and aggressive in every way possible. It never ends good.
    Israel would be better served to re-think its friendship with the kremlin. It should also re-think its strategy regarding Gaza. I know that the terrorists are using civilians as shields, so it’s an extremely difficult situation the country faces if it wants to destroy this criminal group.

    At any rate, Zelensky should do the same with Israel. Maybe he thought like I did, especially after Mr. Weitmann’s ranting at the R(a)T “journalist”. But, if the WP is right, we’re placing our bets on the wrong horse. Then, we must accept the fact that Israel is still not Ukraine’s friend.

    • Putin was “friends” with Berlusconi, and with Netanyahu too…
      afterwards, beyond the affinities between “mafia profiles” – Israel is a very small country without strategic depth, which must “anticipate its conflicts”, which cannot lose its wars, which must effectively make it make Faustian pacts.. . especially since Israel has been pursuing a stinging policy for a while which ultimately multiplies resentment, disappointments, and enmities… today it is a far-right government, I have no knowledge of the History of Men that anything good has come out of such a government… extremism is a cessity.

      • But, from all countries, Israel enjoys the greatest amount of support from the United States. It gets billions worth of arms supplies every year and shared intelligence. There really is no need to cozy up to a fascist crime syndicate.

        • why bet on just one horse?
          (especially if it looks like an elephant!) 😉
          “at the start” or among other things, Israel agrees with Russia to be able to strike targets in Syria without having its planes shot down…
          Otherwise, apart from the fact that Israel does not particularly respect UN resolutions, when Bill Clinton put pressure on Netanyahu to advance the peace process “Bibi” compromised/castrated Clinton with the Monika affair.. .we can see video documents in which Netanyahu boasts of doing what he wants with the Americans – who always say yes to him (even when they should say no)…

          @Bill B
          I’m not sure I understand everything you’re saying, but I’ll give you an answer on :

          “In a densely populated area that is a tall order and at times almost impossible.”

          so if you have to kill all the civilians to achieve your objective, you can change your strategy. if in the end you have results equivalent to or worse than those of the terrorists, you have lowered yourself to their level, and you have insulted the future…
          the military takes the risk of death, the civilians do not.
          the terrorists will always be terrorists, so they will always make HQs under the hospitals… if you allow yourself to destroy the hospital with its occupants to reach a leader (who will also be replaced perhaps by someone worse) I no longer see what will differentiate you from a guy who would enter a school to kill everyone.
          today doctors operate on children without anesthesia in Gaza…
          (in addition to the hostages, there are also French people, at less 70, who worked in cultural centers who we hope to see released and/or remain alive…)

  2. Regarding civilian “non combatants” is rashists deliberately target civilians, while Israel tries to limit civilian collateral damage. In a densely populated area that is a tall order and at times near impossible.
    Because Iran and the rashists are active participants in both terrorist wars it makes for lines crossing over on each other. But trying to be the “nice guy” adhering to international laws while facing an enemy that disregards such notions seems to only put those countries in the unfair position of having less grace from international community for walking the fine line when it’s crossed. While terrorists aren’t being expected to because well, they don’t.

  3. Hmm, I think Ukraine should get out of it, but I do think what Zelensky does could help in the long term, as Israel might at some point change its mind, especially when Russia gets weaker in Syria or it becomes even more obvious Russia is supporting enemies of Israel.

    Netanyahu might be a pro-Russian fool, but Netanyahu isn’t Israel and he won’t be the last prime minster of Israel.

    ^bert

Enter comments here: