scradge1

Why is the bridge still standing?

6 comments

  1. Re the Nato question: he rightly says “there’s too much ruZZian money floating around.”
    Then says that countries like Turkey, Slovakia and Hungary block Ukraine’s membership. Actually Turkey backs Ukraine’s membership, supports Ukrainian land integrity and clearly states Crimea is Ukraine. Of course Erdogan is pally with putler, plays both sides and can’t be trusted, but the Nato problem is Germany, France and the US under Biden. We don’t know what Kamala’s position is, but Biden obnoxiously declines Ukraine’s membership because of “corruption”; ignoring the fact that Turkey, Hungary, Slovakia and others are more corrupt than Ukraine.

    Reply

    • Harris position will be dictated by the brilliance or idiocy of her NSA, Secretary of State , Secretary of Defense and her Chief of Staff.

      Reply

  3. Israel took out terror boss Hassan Nasrallah. It has also taken out Hezbollah’s entire chain of command.
    The hydra is fucked.
    No one except Iran, the izlamonazi movement, commies and the putler murder gang; and they don’t count, will condemn this because they are fucking terrorists.
    The world understands that Hamas, Hezbollah, izlamonazi Iran, isis and the Taliban are terrorists, yet the controllers of all these scum are not officially designated as the filthy, dirty terrorists that they so obviously are.
    So, if Ukraine was to take out putler, Lavrov, Medvedev etc, they would be criticised because the world does not recognise the putler murder gang as terrorists.
    Mad, mad, mad.

    Reply

    • Looking at the entire picture of our world, we can conclude that most Western leaders are borderline insane. Many bad things do not have to be like they are. Our perpetual weakness, cowardice, and greed are only making everything worse.

      Reply

  4. From FB page: Meanwhile in Ukraine:

    “🪖 Analysts from the Institute for the Study of War believe that even a small number of successful long-range Ukrainian strikes could change the course of the war. They also noted that the Kremlin had been conducting covert operations against Western countries long before debates began about Ukraine using Western-supplied weapons to strike Russia.

    The New York Times, citing sources, reported that U.S. intelligence assessments “downplay” the potential impact that Ukrainian strikes on Russia with long-range missile systems provided by the U.S., UK, and France could have on the war. This is due to the limited number of such weapons in Ukraine and uncertainty about future supplies of more long-range systems.

    The NYT also notes that U.S. military and Biden administration officials who support a policy shift have argued that Western-supplied weapons would allow Ukraine to target more distant Russian bases and ammunition depots. This would force Russian forces to relocate their ammunition depots, command posts, combat helicopters, and other equipment out of the range of Western missiles, which, according to officials, would significantly complicate Russia’s supply routes into Ukraine.”

    Reply

Enter comments here: