War powers debate intensifies after Trump orders attack on Iran without approval by Congress

Feb 28, 2026

The U.S. Capitol is photographed Feb. 27, 2026. (Rahmat Gul/AP)

Key members of Congress are demanding a swift vote on a war powers resolution that would restrain President Donald Trump’s military attack on Iran unless the administration wins their approval for what they warn is a potentially illegal campaign that risks pulling the United States into a deeper Middle East conflict.

Both the House and Senate, where the president’s Republican Party has a slim majority, had already drafted such resolutions long before the strikes Saturday. Now they are ready to plunge into a rare war powers debate next week that will serve as a referendum on Trump’s decision to go it alone on military action without formal authorization from Congress.

“Has President Trump learned nothing from decades of U.S. meddling in Iran and forever wars in the Middle East?” said Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., a leader in the bipartisan effort. He said the strikes on Iran were “a colossal mistake.”

In the House, Reps. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., and Thomas Massie, R-Ky., are demanding Congress go on record with a public vote on their own bipartisan measure. “Congress must convene on Monday to vote,” Khanna said, “to stop this.”

Massie blasted Trump’s own presidential campaign slogan and said: “This is not ‘America First.’”

But most Republicans, particularly their leaders, welcomed Trump’s move against Iran. Many cited the longtime U.S. adversary’s nuclear programs and missile capabilities as requiring a military response.

“Well done, Mr. President,” said Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C. “As I watch and monitor this historic operation, I’m in awe of President Trump’s determination to be a man of peace but at the end of the day, evil’s worst nightmare.”

War powers debate tests Congress

The administration’s decision to launch, with Israel, what appears to be an open-ended joint military operation aimed at changing the government in Tehran is testing the Constitution’s separation of powers in deep and dramatic ways. Nearly two months earlier, Trump ordered U.S. strikes that toppled Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro.

While presidents have the authority as the commander in chief to conduct certain strategic military operations on their own, the Constitution vests Congress with the power to wage war. Before the Iraq War began in March 2003, Republican President George W. Bush made a monthslong push to secure congressional authorization. No such vote was attempted on Iran, and an earlier Senate effort to halt Trump’s actions after last summer’s strike on Iran failed.

The congressional debate over war powers would mostly be symbolic. Even if a resolution were to pass the narrowly split Congress, Trump likely would veto it and Congress would not have the two-thirds majority needed to overturn that rejection. Congress has often failed to block other U.S. military actions, including in a Senate vote on Venezuela, but the roll calls stand as a public record.

A damaged car remains on the ground in the aftermath of an Israeli-U.S. strike in Tehran, Iran, Feb. 28, 2026. (Amir Kholousi/ISNA/AP)

Republican leaders back Trump’s action

The response by House Speaker Mike Johnson reflected the party’s long-standing views. Iran, he said, is facing “the severe consequences of its evil actions.”

Johnson, R-La., said the leaders of the House and Senate and the respective intelligence committees had been briefed in detail earlier in the week that military action “may become necessary” to protect U.S. troops and citizens in Iran. He said he received updates from Secretary of State Marco Rubio and will stay in “close contact” with Trump and the Defense Department “as this operation proceeds.”

Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., commended Trump “for taking action to thwart these threats.”

Thune said he looked forward to administration officials briefing all senators — a signal that lawmakers are seeking more answers to their questions about Trump’s plans ahead.

Democrats warn strikes are illegal

Many Democrats are calling the operation illegal, saying the Constitution gives Congress alone the power to declare war. To them, the administration has failed to lay out its rationale or plan for the military strikes, and the aftermath.

Sen. Chris Van Hollen, who serves on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said the president has undertaken “illegal, regime-change war against Iran.”

“This is not making us safer & only damages the US & our interests,” Van Hollen, D-Md., said in a social media post. “The Senate must immediately vote on the War Powers Resolution to stop it.”

House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York said while Iran is a “bad actor and must be aggressively confronted” for its human rights abuses and the threat it poses to the U.S. and allies, the administration ”must seek authorization for the preemptive use of military force that constitutes an act of war.”

New York Sen. Chuck Schumer, the Democratic leader, demanded that Congress be briefed immediately on the administration’s plans.

“Iran must never be allowed to attain a nuclear weapon but the American people do not want another endless and costly war in the Middle East when there are so many problems at home,” he said.

https://www.defensenews.com/news/pentagon-congress/2026/02/28/war-powers-debate-intensifies-after-trump-orders-attack-on-iran-without-approval-by-congress

10 comments

  1. I hate the iranian regime as much as anyone else, maybe even more so, but what Taco is doing is illegal without Congress’s approval. That’s a fact.

    • The War Powers Resolution of 1973 is frequently invoked by presidents notifying Congress of military actions, most recently by President Biden regarding actions against Iran-backed groups in 2023-2024.
      Last Formal Declaration: The last time Congress officially declared war was in 1942 during World War II.

      Now you know the facts.

      • “actions against Iran-backed groups in 2023-2024.”

        President Biden authorized several military airstrikes against Iranian-backed groups in Syria and Iraq, justifying them as defensive actions to protect U.S. personnel.

        Not quite the same as attacking Iran directly and trying to kill the leaders of the regime.

      • Red I get what you’re saying and u destined BUT this is in all sincerity another attempt by Trump to do whatever the hell ge wants without regard to the constitution. The article even points to the fact Bush negotiated for a mo th with congress. No such broad discussions were held with congress. Notwithstanding some members of the intelligence and arms committees got a heads.

        But regardless I do commend Trump of potentially getting g rid of a regime we have been messing with for over 50 years

  2. > Republican gets elected President.

    > Cuts benefits for the poor.

    > Cuts taxes for the rich.

    > Starts a war in the Middle East.

    It’s crazy how it’s always the same thing every single time.

    • Sorry Larry don’t buy it. The regime is evil and we (the world) have been screwing around for 50 years. Sure I don’t agree with disregarding the constitution but all in all this is a good thing

      • If it leads to regime change, it’s a good thing. If it leads to a drop in Iranian support for ruSSia (either due to regime change, or because the US and/or Israel targeted Shahed production/storage sites), it’s a good thing.

        That doesn’t invalidate my point.

        • The issue is attacking Iran. You only listed peripheral stuff which has absolutely nothing to do with the Iranian attack. Starts war in the Middle East? Are you serious. The Middle East has been at war for fifty years

          • I’m just laying out the typical Republican playbook. (Actually, quoting a meme, but it seems to fit.)

            > The Middle East has been at war for fifty years

            Sorry if I wasn’t clear.

            > Republican gets elected President.
            > Cuts benefits for the poor.
            > Cuts taxes for the rich.
            > Starts a war in the Middle East.

            The Republican President starts a war with the US against a country in the Middle East. Not referring to any other conflicts within the ME. (I wrote, “Starts *a* war”, not “Starts war”.)

            trumpkov – Iran. (Seventh country he’s bombed in 1 year.)
            George W. Bush – Afghanistan and the Iraq War.
            George H.W. Bush – Persian Gulf War.

            We could even go back further and count Thomas Jefferson, who initiated the First Barbary War against Tripoli. (He started the Democratic-Republican Party, known at the time as the Republican Party.)

Enter comments here: