Jun 23, 2024
A map has shown the Russian military bases in Ukraine that Army Tactical Missile Systems could strike with the U.S.’s permission.
ATACMS missiles are long-range missiles Ukraine has used during Russia’s full-scale invasion of the country, which began in February 2022.
On June 22, the Institute for the Study of War, a U.S. think tank, issued a campaign assessment that showed Ukraine could target some 16 percent of Russia’s ground sanctuary if it had permission to use the missiles within a certain range.
Kyiv first used the missiles in October to strike two Russian military bases in Ukraine, damaging numerous helicopters. They have also been used by Kyiv’s military on Russian targets in contested territory, including in Crimea, which Russia annexed from Ukraine in 2014.
In April, national security adviser Jake Sullivan said President Joe Biden had authorized sending a “significant number of ATACMS missiles” to Ukraine in February as part of a $300 million aid package.
The U.S. has said Ukraine can use the weapons to strike Russian targets within a certain territory, but it placed limits on long-range strikes across the border.
The ISW map showed that Ukraine would be able to hit Russian targets—including Bryansk Oblast, Kursk Oblast and Belgorod Oblast—that could remove a maximum of 16 percent of Russia’s ground sanctuary. However, it said it was unclear whether Ukrainian forces had permission to do so.
“The West maintains the ability to substantially disrupt Russian operations at scale by allowing Ukraine to use Western-provided weapons to strike Russia’s operational rear and deep rear areas in Russian territory,” IWS said in its report.
The report also said that U.S. policy preserves a minimum of 84 percent of Russia’s ground sanctuary by not allowing Ukraine to hit certain targets in range of ATACMS, such as Voronezh Oblast and Rostov Oblast.
Newsweek contacted the Defense Intelligence of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine for comment by email.
The ISW report also said that Russian air defenses would reduce the effectiveness of Ukrainian F-16 fighter jets if the U.S. did not allow Ukrainian forces to use ATACMS to destroy Russian air defense systems in Russian territory, as it would mean Ukrainian F-16 pilots would have to operate in a dangerous airspace.
Four countries—Denmark, the Netherlands, Norway and Belgium—have committed to providing the aircraft to Ukraine to boost its efforts against superior Russian aircraft.
The think tank said, “ISW continues to assess that the U.S. should allow Ukraine to strike all military targets in Russia’s operational and deep rear areas with U.S.-provided weapons.”
https://www.newsweek.com/ukraine-atacms-russian-military-bases-1916203
“The report also said that U.S. policy preserves a minimum of 84 percent of Russia’s ground sanctuary by not allowing Ukraine to hit certain targets in range of ATACMS, such as Voronezh Oblast and Rostov Oblast.”
I would appreciate it if someone could give me viable reasoning about the Biden administration’s decision to allow Ukraine to strike mafia territory but only to a certain distance, leaving a sizeable safe zone for the enemy. For the life of me, it simply makes no sense whatsoever. Such measures cost additional Ukrainian lives, causes more destruction, lengthens the war, and increases the cost of the war.
When the defenders requested modern MBT’s from the west, they ended up with less than 20% of the numbers they requested. It’s the same with modern artillery systems and ammo.
Now it looks like the 200 F16’s (or equivalent) requested is going to come in at the usual 20% yet again : too little too late.
To make serious progress against the nazi scum horde, Ukraine will need 200 modern aircraft, almost as many trained pilots and very many thousands of ATACMS (or equivalent).
The Ukrainians need to build a standing army of two million combat troops. They will need ALL the putinaZi cash. The task is to remove all orcs and then fortify. In practical terms, that means an awesome air defence architecture and a credible nuclear deterrent.
In fact, what Ukraine needs is a group of real leaders across the West and not these foolish clowns.