Trump begged for the safety of war criminal Putin – Content Alert – Commentary

Alert: The views expressed in this article or video are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of UkraineToday.org.   We apologize for any campaigning, irrelevant, divisive or questionable content.

Stand With Ukraine

May 8, 2026

Dr Liza Rose

Today President Donald J. Trump begged for the safety of War Criminal Putin.

Trump begged President Zelenskyy for a safe parade for the Moscow military.

Trump begged for the safety of war criminals who attacked a Ukrainan kindergarten school this week.

Because of Donald J. Trump negotiating on behalf of the Russian terror regime,
“President Zelensky has ordered the Ukrainian military not to strike the May 9 Military parade in Moscow.”
source: Kyiv Post

  1. Zelenskyy achieved striking fear into the kremlin.
  2. Zelenskyy achieved long range attacks into Moscow recently.
  3. The Kremlin fears Ukrainians so much so that they beg Trump to ask for Ukraine’s permission to hold their own parade.

Who holds the cards : President Zelenskyy.

And Donald Trump is Putin’s puppet.

The world was looking forward to Ukraine blanketing Moscow skies with drones on May 9, allowing one day of repreive for the Ukrainians after four years of attacks on civilians.

Just this week Russia’s deadly attacks included a kindergarten school in Ukraine. The attacks by Russians always target civilians.

Russians have abducted over 20,000 Ukrainian babies and children since 2022.

Last month Donald Trump lifted sanctions on two Russian oil companies known to be currently trafficking the Ukrainian children.
Due to Donald Trump those two companies made billions over night. Those billions certainly are being used for child trafficking.

🔴 Today the United States begged for the safety of war criminals on behalf of the Kremlin.
Yet the Trump Administration has never told Russia to leave Ukraine.

The Trump Administration works for Dictator Vladimir Putin.

Donald Trump and JD Vance are traitors to Americans, Ukrainians, Europeans, Democracy, and Humanity.

Follow Liza Rose for blunt analysis and meaningful content.

UnitedStates #europe #ukraine #trending #unitedkingdom

………………

……………………..

Lee Mendoza

HOW DOES #Ukraine HIT so many #oilandgas facilities… over and over?

Since mid-April, Ukraine has struck the Tuapse oil terminal on Russia’s Black Sea coast four times, triggering major fires at one of the country’s key oil export hubs despite active air defenses and repeated Russian claims of intercepted drones.

The attacks have caused days-long fires, halted refinery operations, polluted parts of the coastline, and forced authorities into prolonged emergency response efforts.

This raises a question: If Russia maintains one of the largest air defense networks in the world, how are Ukrainian drones continuing to reach the same facility time and time again?

The attacks on Tuapse expose the difficulty of defending oil infrastructure against sustained long-range drone campaigns. Ukraine’s strategy relies on attritional, sustained pressure, where even a handful of drones that penetrate defenses can cause major disruption at large, highly flammable facilities.

Russia’s air defense dilemma

Russia’s oil infrastructure is spread across the largest country on earth, with refineries, storage depots, pumping stations, and export terminals dispersed across millions of square kilometers.

Protecting such a network forces Russian air defenses to be distributed far more widely than earlier in the war, when coverage was concentrated primarily around Moscow, front line regions, and major military facilities.

Justin Bronk, a senior research fellow at the Royal United Services Institute, said the scale of Russia’s energy infrastructure creates a structural challenge for its air defenses.

“There are so many potential targets that Russia needs to try and defend,” says Bronk.

That dispersion weakens one of the key advantages of Russia’s air defense architecture: layered coverage.

Russian air defenses are designed to operate as overlapping networks of long-, medium-, and short-range systems concentrated in the same area, creating dense layers of detection and interception. Spread across a much wider territory, that overlap becomes harder to maintain.

“There is a disproportionate efficiency gain from having air defenses layered in the same location,” Bronk explains. “As Ukraine forces Russia to disperse its air defenses over a much wider area, there is a disproportionate loss of effectiveness.”

Even when Russian defenses intercept most incoming drones, oil infrastructure remains particularly vulnerable to cascading damage from relatively small strikes.

“We don’t know how many (drones) Ukraine had to launch in order to get a few through,” Bronk also notes.

But unlike more conventional industrial or military facilities, even a small number of successful hits on oil infrastructure can have outsized effects. Petroleum products are highly flammable, while storage tanks and piping networks are generally not armored or hardened.
“Russia’s weak point is its oil refining complex.”
“If you get several drones through defenses around a factory with small warheads, you might just damage the roof,” Bronk explains. “Whereas if you get those same few drones through to an oil and gas refinery, there’s a decent chance you cause a large fire or explosion.”

According to Bronk, Russia’s short-range #Pantsir systems, which form the backbone of drone defense at many critical sites, may be under increasing strain, particularly due to #ammunitionshortages.

Russia is increasingly relying on medium- and long-range surface-to-air missile systems, as well as helicopters, to intercept Ukrainian drones instead of primarily using Pantsir systems, Bronk says.

“That may help explain why Ukraine continues to penetrate defenses around facilities like Tuapse,” he adds.

The logic behind Ukraine’s campaign against Russian oil

Ukrainian deep strikes are central to Kyiv’s broader effort to impose higher military and economic costs on Russia’s war effort.

Tuapse, located on Russia’s Black Sea coast in Krasnodar Krai, is one of the country’s key oil export hubs, processing about 12 million tons of oil annually through its refinery and terminal infrastructure.

According to Dmytro Zhmailo, an executive director of the Ukrainian Center for Security and Cooperation, the port and nearby #Novorossiysk also serve as major gateways for Russia’s shadow tanker fleet operating through the Black Sea.

That strategic role has made Tuapse a recurring target in Ukraine’s long-range strike campaign.

“Why was it hit again? Because it was not fully destroyed,” Zhmailo says.

Rather than attempting to destroy heavily protected facilities in a single strike, Ukraine appears to be pursuing a campaign aimed at gradually degrading Russia’s oil infrastructure over time.

Ukraine has targeted multiple parts of Russia’s oil supply chain, including refineries, pumping stations, storage facilities, and infrastructure linked to the country’s shadow tanker fleet. Zhmailo points to recent strikes on facilities such as the Gorky refinery and Lukoil-Nefteorgsintez as part of the same effort.

“We often say Ukraine’s weakest point in this war is protection against Russian ballistic and aeroballistic missiles,” Zhmailo says. “Russia’s weak point is its oil refining complex.”

According to Zhmailo, Ukrainian strikes have caused short-term disruptions to roughly 10% of Russia’s oil export infrastructure.

Data compiled by Bloomberg shows that Ukrainian attacks on Russian oil infrastructure reached a four-month peak in April, with at least 21 strikes recorded against refineries, pipelines, and maritime oil assets.

The attacks pushed Russia’s average refinery capacity down to 4.69 million barrels per day, its lowest level since December 2009, according to the report.

Zhmailo acknowledges that many Ukrainian drones are still intercepted before reaching their targets.

“When we see a successful Ukrainian drone strike, maybe nine other drones in that wave were shot down by Russian air defenses,” he says.

But Ukraine does not need most of the drones to reach their targets for the deep-strike campaign to remain effective. Even a limited number of successful strikes can force refinery shutdowns, trigger costly repairs, disrupt export logistics, and compel Moscow to keep redistributing air defense assets across a vast territory.

According to Zhmailo, the effectiveness of Ukraine’s long-range strike campaign is partly the result of years of systematic attacks on Russian air defense systems, particularly in occupied Crimea.

“We are in a much better position now than we were a year ago,” he says.

The gradual erosion of Russia’s air defenses since 2022 is now producing visible results. Ukrainian forces have systematically targeted radar systems, launchers, and other air defense assets deep behind the front line, increasing the likelihood that long-range strikes can penetrate Russian defenses.

Importantly, Ukraine’s deep-strike campaign may now be having a greater impact, as the broader battlefield situation has shifted compared to a year ago.

According to Bronk, Ukraine has improved recruitment and training pipelines in recent months, helping stabilize manpower pressures along parts of the front. At the same time, Russia is increasingly struggling to replace battlefield losses at the same rate.

Against that backdrop, the economic and logistical damage caused by Ukrainian attacks on Russian infrastructure is becoming more consequential.

“The Russian continued losses in terms of economic and material losses from Ukraine’s long-range strike campaign are more important than perhaps they were last year,” Bronk says, because they now compound “a battlefield situation that is not going as well for them.”

…..,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Myroslava Nazaruk

Yesterday these women were killed by Russia in Sumy 💔

🕯️ Larissa Gordienko
🕯️ Tamara Victoria Yasenova

Employees of the kindergarten, on which Russian terrorists hit by two drones.

Sincere condolences to the family…

06.05.2026

………..

https://www.facebook.com/share/g/18VcaEcqkh/?mibextid=wwXIfr

12 comments

  1. Krasnov and his malignant sidekick VanZkov are complicit in the murders of Larissa Gordienko and Tamara Victoria Yasenova.
    They have done their best to choke the flow of essential munitions to Ukraine.
    Furthermore, VanZkov is proud of it.
    Those two criminal scum and Gabbard deserve the total contempt and hatred of all warm-blooded people.
    Their rightful place is The Hague, together with the putler murder gang.

    • This will be the last time I say this. Posts need a link to their source. I will not let you jeopardize this site. This site is for Ukraine, not your personal politics. I will start pulling these types of posts down.

      • It is originally from an FB page. You can get a link to FB videos, but articles are almost impossible to lift a link from. But you only need to know the name of the page in order to see the article.
        It has been posted on highly reputable, high readership pro-Ukraine sites like Conservatives 4 Ukraine, Stand With Ukraine, Liz Cheney/Adam Kinzinger and many others.
        Now it is being reposted on LI. It will get many more views than most national newspapers get.
        It is not anything to do with my personal politics, it simply presents factual information in a way that you don’t like.
        Please state what the article says that is incorrect?
        You have stated many times that your hero wants to help Ukraine.
        You have been proved disastrously wrong. Doubly so since that shameful meeting in the Oval Office in Feb 2025. I would have thought that would have been enough for you, but it seems not.
        If Trump does or says anything helpful to Ukraine, I will show it.
        In fact Dr Rose did post something fairly recently that was positive to Trump and I posted that too.
        Stand With Ukraine had a post yesterday that was positive about something that Trump said that I had teed up as a draft. You can see it. It’s still sitting in drafts.
        I did not publish it because it turned out to be from a website that had got its facts wrong.

        • There is nothing factual about Facebook. You should know that. Social media is just that. It has nothing to do with if I like it or not. And don’t gaslight me. If its good for Ukraine, I’m down with it, you should know that too. While you’re using my format you will follow my rules. Just as I would if I was using yours.

          • “If it’s good for Ukraine, I’m down with it.”

            I can certainly agree with that.
            Tell me what I have ever posted that does not comply with that statement?
            I will continue to post factual, legitimate information that is good for Ukraine, from whatever source. News sites, LI, Substack, govt sites etc etc.
            You will respond how you like; as I said before, there is nothing I can do about that.
            I don’t recall you complaining to me when I posted articles that were critical of Biden, Clinton, Obama etc.

        • Scradge, when you’re on a FB page, or any other, just copy the address in the address bar on top and insert it into your post and make it into a link.

          • When I’m scrolling through my FB feed, the link at the top of the page is “https://wwwfacebookcom/?sk=h_chr” – it has nothing to do with whatever article I’m reading.

            (I just posted an easy way to link directly to a specific post, in another reply.)

            • (I put the periods in angle brackets so it wouldn’t be a link, and they disappeared completely. But you get the idea…)

            • When you are on a FB report’s page, the address for it is in the address bar. It also works for videos and so forth.

        • “It is originally from an FB page. […] articles are almost impossible to lift a link from.”

          Actually, it’s easy if you know how (and use a web browser; I don’t know about phone apps).

          Below the poster’s name, there’s a time stamp. Right now, I see:
          Liza Rose
          12h

          If you hover the mouse over the timestamp, you see “Friday, May 8, 2026 at 10:40 PM”. But if you right-click on the timestamp and copy the link address, you get a long URL that will bring you back to the article.

          Here’s a link to that post.
          https://www.facebook.com/Lisinka.Rose?__cft__%5B0%5D=AZaIJX0WLoeA1lKLh_nHhadjjJTz11yG8epz0YF4bNuylvfYvX9NlCcdhzzFudQYd0cobiyKMiryv9QAJfm8KCKiRiP6qJR20o1fkhW8By05R2lqlzxUdnd5B8PbrIkmgBjFYxpxrxgbWsM3TlScKpPPEA1zOc0O-FEY_b8Ov77pSm0If-SUHEL5r2PcMynDp1s&__tn__=%2CO%2CP-R

Enter respectful comments here: