By Lemuel Chyme
Nov 16, 2025
The matter was settled in 1991.
Update :
H.J.Res.77 – Establishing that it shall be the policy of the Government of the United States to recognize the sovereignty, independence, and territorial integrity of Ukraine within that nation’s internationally recognized borders as established in 1991.
The internationally recognized boundary of Ukraine:
The 1991 Independence Referendum:
On average 94% of Ukrainians voted for independence from Russia. In the Donbas it was 82%. In Crimea it was 54%.
Countries that recognize Crimea as part of ruZZia : Cuba, Nicaragua, Venezuela, Syria, Afghanistan, North Korea.
Wiki :
Autonomous Republic of Crimea
Has Crimea ever been part of Russia?
Crimea was part of Russia from 1783, when the Tsarist Empire annexed it a decade after defeating Ottoman forces in the Battle of Kozludzha, until 1954, when the Soviet government transferred Crimea from the Russian Soviet Federation of Socialist Republics (RSFSR) to the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic (UkrSSR).
Many do not seem to understand the difference between “part of Russia” and “occupied by Russia.”
Crimea was never “part of Russia.” It was occupied by Russia from 1783-1954 and again from 2014 to the present.
The original owners of Crimea were the Greeks, then the Genovese and then the Tatars, who after over 600 years can rightly be referred to as the indigenous people of Crimea.
They were the majority there until Lenin and then Stalin started seeding the peninsula with Russians. In 1944, Stalin went a step further with his deportation/genocide of Tatars.
After independence, the descendants of the displaced steadily began to return. This process was well underway when putler invaded in 2014 and put a stop to it. Result being that Tatars left Crimea; not for Russia but for “safe” parts of Ukraine. Those that remained suffered and continue to suffer torture by electricity, show trials followed by absurdly long prison sentences and “disappearances.”
Crimea belongs to the Tatars and they want to be Ukrainian, not Russian.
There was a Scottish independence referendum in 2014. The “scotz natz” had peaked. They got 44.4% for “yes.” “No” got 55.3%, slightly less than the 54% of Crimea who voted for independence from ruZZia.
A new Scottish independence referendum now would result in an increased “no” vote.
The likelihood of ruZZian interference with the 2014 Scottish referendum is very high indeed. The defeated SNP leader; Alex Salmond went on to work for; you guessed it, RT. You could not make it up.
Salmond, who has since died, was later revealed to be a serial sex pervert.
Russia’s “peace terms” :-
Personally I’d tell them to shove them up their arses. But if Ukrainians want to accept this, then I will reluctantly accept their will. That day will never come. God willing.
The rat nazi is not going to negotiate or do a “trade.” He will only rethink if defeated militarily, destroyed economically, or taken out by his own people.
The nature of democracy is such that there will always be someone who is disappointed. It’s not a great system until you look at the type of filth that advocate dictatorships: ie the bloc that is headed up by the CRINKs and contains unfortunately the most populous nations in the world.
The 45% of Scots that voted for independence were disappointed, but they accepted it.
Personally I love Scotland and the Scots. Not the natz and not the supporters of Glasgow Celtic obviously. (IRA scum).
I hope the union will last forever.
The point being that Ukraine’s independence referendum was incredibly decisive.
The putinaZis must go.
In the words of Edgar Broughton :
OUT DEMONS OUT
The only one who questions borders, laws, and agreements are the mafiosi in the crime syndicate, even if they’ve signed something themselves.