DW P.

Producer and Film Director @ Ukraine Story | Documentary Filmmaker | Attorney | Journalist | Covering 2024-2026 Olympics, Politics, Russian Disinformation, Ukrainian Athletics

George Mason University – Antonin Scalia Law School 

Ukraine Story

Executive producer: Kyiv Of Mine

Nov 17, 2025

What About Ukrainian Women Ms. Greene? What about Ukrainian Children? Ukrainian victims?

It is difficult for me to hear Majorie Taylor Greene give a “Me Too” speech after being labelled a traitor by Trump, while insisting her life is now in jeopardy and that she stands with women and the victims of human trafficking.

Has any member of Congress has done more to enable the trafficking of Ukrainian children and the rape of Ukrainian women by labelling Ukraine a Nazi state, and Putin a defender of “traditional” values, than Marjorie Taylor Greene?

Comment from :

Akos Magyar

She was against Ukraine, against Israel, opposed hitting Iran, opposed hitting the Houthis (who were interdicting international shipping affecting the world). She was against deporting migrants, she was against the moves against Venezuela. Her boyfriend insulted a WH guest, Zelensky. She not only opposed Ukraine’s arming but was critical of peace talks and was pushing Kremlin propaganda on her Instagram page. She also accused AIPAC of being a foreign agent and made statements that implied insults against Mrs Adelson, who is a close friend of the Trump family. She was flushed. And now she claims she’s a victim to CNN.

……,…………

The Kremlin’s #1 Proxy in Congress Seeks a Rebrand

She is a self-avowed former QAnon activist. No member of Congress has been more specific, contemptuous and aggressive at reiterating Kremlin talking points about Ukraine. Her perpetual foam-at-the mouth antics and vituperations against opponents has been impressive for its consistency.

But now, Marjorie Taylor Greene has been labelled a “traitor” by President Trump and she is fighting to rescue her political career.

Today Marjorie Taylor Greene issued an apology for her role in “toxic politics” and accused the president of rhetoric that threatens her physical safety.

She said that she is “hurt” by the president. He said she was a “lunatic.”

What is the true nature of the division?

The fundamental problem between Greene and Trump is not the Epstein files. Nor was it the bombing of Iran, Trump’s support for Israel or sanctions placed by the White House on her beloved Mr. Putin.

Those are all subset problems — clues to a fundamental proposition which motivated Greene and her compadres in the woke Right to elect Trump, who they believed would be the champion of their cause.

The real problem relates to the fact that Greene, Candace Owens, Tucker Carlson and their ilk, are full blown isolationists, anti-semites and leaders of then”blame America first” club – a society of conspiratorialists who believe that the CIA, Mossad, Jewish bankers, and wealthy pedophiles control the world, and enforce their will through bribery and assassinations.

Trump is not now, nor has he ever been a member of that club.

This kind of thinking does not sit well with Trump. After all, he’s the boss. If what they say is correct then either (1) he is part of the cabal, or (2) he is controlled by the cabal, and is not really the boss.

Because their weltanschauung is conspiracy, it provides the metanarrative for all of life and politics. It’s the reason why Putin is their hero and the “rat faced comedian in cargo pants” (Carlson’s words for the Jewish president of Ukraine) is an enemy.

In sum – these individuals staked their entire reputations and built their empires on a QAnon adjacent theory – a core belief that international elites backed by Jews, and enforced by the Mossad and the CIA are seeking to destroy a Christian civilization that Putin is fighting to protect.

They believed that Trump would open the Epstein files, the Kennedy assassination files and secret DOJ documents, proving the international cabal and validating their conspiracy.

Everything else proceeds from these basic propositions.

They believed that Trump would vindicate them.

He did not. Now they are stuck.

So far, Carlson has straddled the fence to save his influence operation. (Remember also – his son works for the VP as a speechwriter.) Owens has declared war and accused Trump of complicity in the murder of Charlie Kirk. Now Greene has been disowned and excommunicated.

It’s going to be a tough rebrand.

….,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

The Truth About the “Ukrainian Corruption Scandal”

I want to suggest five perspective points about the recent corruption scandal in Ukraine.

First: Corruption exists everywhere—always has, always will. The real story is how decisively Ukraine has been breaking with the corruption it inherited from Russia. Even under daily missile attacks and ongoing war crimes, Ukraine’s anti-corruption agencies identified wrongdoing and moved to prosecute it. That’s not a failure. That’s a functioning system.

Second: The United States is hardly in a position to clutch pearls here. American political life for the past decade has been consumed by dueling corruption accusations—Democrats accusing Republicans, Republicans accusing Democrats. Trump himself was elected on an anti-corruption message (DOJ, Hunter Biden, ballot fraud, etc.). American corruption simply wears different clothes.

Third: The “corruption gap” between Ukraine and Russia is the difference between the occasional schoolyard thug shaking down lunch money and an entrenched, full-time La Cosa Nostra state. In Ukraine, corruption is an illness to be treated and eliminated. In Russia, corruption is the operating system.

Fourth: The fact that corrupt actors in Ukraine are being exposed and punished is evidence of reform, not rot. Transparency isn’t the absence of wrongdoing—it’s the capacity to discover it, confront it, and correct it. Meanwhile, in the U.S., major corruption probes often drag on for years with minimal accountability.

Fifth: You and I will be judged by the standard we judge others. Before invoking Ukrainian corruption as an argument against Western support, remember the standard you’re setting. Imagine you, your family, or your country under genocidal assault—your people bombed, murdered, raped, driven from their homes. And imagine your friends shrugging you off because, “Well, I heard you have some corruption.” Does internal imperfection negate the justice of your cause? Should a nation fighting for survival be abandoned because it is not flawless?

Finally: The two countries least qualified to lecture Ukraine about corruption are the United States and Russia: one trapped in perpetual partisan accusations, the other built on industrial-scale kleptocracy. (Thank you to the White House for declining to comment as of now.)

So congratulations to Ukraine for identifying a crime and prosecuting it. May America learn from your example—and may Russia’s criminal empire fade into the ash heap of history.

DW Phillips
Ukraine Story