Senate votes to limit Trump on Venezuela

The procedural vote is a rare critique of Trump’s authority in the first test of GOP loyalty since last weekend’s capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and Sen. Tim Kaine, co-sponsor of the latest war powers measure, prepare to speak with reporters after senators were briefed by Trump administration officials about Venezuela operations on Jan. 7, 2026. | Francis Chung/AP

By Connor O’Brien01/08/2026 11:53 AM EST

The Senate on Thursday voted to advance legislation that would force President Donald Trump to seek congressional approval before taking any new military action in Venezuela, a stunning rebuke for the White House in the first big test of GOP unity since the U.S. capture of President Nicolás Maduro.

GOP Sens. Rand Paul of Kentucky, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Susan Collins of Maine, Todd Young of Indiana and Josh Hawley of Missouri backed the measure to check Trump in a 52-47 vote. Paul, a cosponsor of the resolution, and Murkowski have supported previous attempts to rein in Trump. Democratic Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania also supported the measure despite previously signaling he might oppose it.

It is the second time the Senate has voted on restricting Trump in Venezuela since November, albeit with a much different outcome. And Democrats have promised more tough votes that force Republicans to take a public stance as Trump threatens to seize Greenland.

Three Republicans who previously opposed efforts to restrict Trump changed their votes in this latest effort, which comes less than a week after the administration’s capture. Collins, who chairs the Senate Appropriations Committee, Hawley and Young supported the measure after opposing an earlier resolution that came to the floor before Maduro’s ouster.

Fetterman, who voted alongside fellow Democrats, was seen as a wild card headed into the vote. He hailed the military operation that ousted Maduro, but had supported a previous effort to require Trump to seek congressional input on Venezuela.

The vote is a shocking sign of divisions among the GOP on Trump’s plans for the South American country, including the president’s pronouncements that the U.S. will “run” Venezuela and control its oil sales.

The Senate will next debate the measure and vote to pass it. But the resolution would still need to pass the House, which could prove tricker. And if it does, Trump is likely to veto it. The margin of victory in Thursday’s vote was well short of the two-thirds majority needed to override a presidential veto.

(c)POLITICO 2025

7 comments

  1. Not sure what’s in the bill, but could this just be a way not to lose both houses in midterms?

    • My thoughts too, Mike. Will it work? I doubt it. There’s more evilness to Taco than just Venezuela. The murder of an American citizen in Minnesota won’t help the gangster in chief, either.

        • It wasn’t evil, it was illegal. Not saying the Marduro doesn’t deserve it, but it would be nice if the orange gangster would follow our laws, don’t you think, Red?

  2. Good. But, Congress MUST do more to rein in this nutcase. It would be high-time to impeach him and remove him from office.

Enter comments here: