President Vladimir Putin on Tuesday signed a revised nuclear doctrine declaring that a conventional attack on Russia by any nation that is supported by a nuclear power will be considered a joint attack on his country.
Putin’s endorsement of the new nuclear deterrent policy comes on the 1,000th day after he sent troops into Ukraine, on Feb. 24, 2022.
It follows US President Joe Biden’s decision to let Ukraine strike targets inside Russia with US-supplied longer-range missiles.
The signing of the doctrine, which says that any massive aerial attack on Russia could trigger a nuclear response, demonstrates Putin’s readiness to tap the country’s nuclear arsenal to force the West to back down as Moscow presses a slow-moving offensive in Ukraine.
Asked whether the updated doctrine was deliberately issued on the heels of Biden’s decision, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said the document was published “in a timely manner” and that Putin instructed the government to update it earlier this year so that it is “in line with the current situation.”
Putin first announced changes in the nuclear doctrine in September, when he chaired a meeting discussing the proposed revisions.
Russia’s president has previously warned the US and other NATO allies that allowing Ukraine to use Western-supplied longer-range weapons to hit Russian territory would mean that Russia and NATO are at war.
The updated doctrine states that an attack against Russia by a nonnuclear power with the “participation or support of a nuclear power” will be seen as their “joint attack on the Russian Federation.”
It adds that Russia could use nuclear weapons in response to a nuclear strike or a conventional attack posing a “critical threat to sovereignty and territorial integrity” of Russia and its ally Belarus, a vague formulation that leaves broad room for interpretation.
It does not specify whether such an attack would necessarily trigger a nuclear response. It mentions the “uncertainty of scale, time and place of possible use of nuclear deterrent” among the key principles of the nuclear deterrence.
The document also notes that an aggression against Russia by a member of a military bloc or coalition is viewed as “an aggression by the entire bloc,” a clear reference to NATO.
At the same time, it spells out conditions for using nuclear weapons in greater detail compared with previous versions of the doctrine, noting they could be used in case of a massive air attack involving ballistic and cruise missiles, aircraft, drones and other flying vehicles.
The wide formulation appears to significantly broaden the triggers for possible nuclear weapons use compared with the previous version of the document, which stated that Russia could tap its atomic arsenal if case of an attack with ballistic missiles.
President Alexander Lukashenko, who has ruled Belarus with an iron hand for more than 30 years and has relied on Russian subsidies and support, has allowed Russia to use his country’s territory to send troops into Ukraine and to deploy some of its tactical nuclear weapons.
Since Putin sent troops into Ukraine, he and other Russian voices have frequently threatened the West with Russia’s nuclear arsenal to discourage it from ramping up support for Kyiv.
Russian hawks have been calling for toughening the doctrine for months, arguing that the previous version failed to deter the West from increasing its aid to Ukraine and created the impression that Moscow would not resort to nuclear weapons. (AP)
https://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20241119050114

This is more BS from the terrorist state. Since when does a dictator need a doctrine? This is all show for the West, but it didn’t work. Last night ATACMS destroyed a missile depot in Bryansk, the orcs response never mentioned ATACMS, only drones in the area.
Putin doesn’t need a doctrine, he needs a doctor.
Yeah, one to pronounce him dead.
Well, brain dead he already is.
European stocks just went red due to putler’s nuke threat.
For the rat nazi: REEEZULT!
Next : his friends in the GOP putler wing will scream “Warhawk!” Again, while confirming that Zel “has lost his allowance.”
Despite all your efforts to dissuade the GOP from supporting Ukraine, the majority of them still do. Try encouraging and inviting the GOP to support Ukraine. Ask yourself, what would Ukraine do?
Ask yourself : why has Trumpkov hired three conspiracy theorist, Ukraine-hating non-Republicans for top jobs? Why has he put a ruZZian agent in charge of intel? Would you put intel about Ukraine into the hands of putrid worm like Gabbardova?
Ask yourself: why does his asshole son hate Ukraine with such intensity?
Ask yourself: why he appointed a person who openly stated that he doesn’t care about Ukraine one way or another to the role of VP?
As yourself : why your hero openly congratulated putler on unleashing genocide?
Why does your hero openly praise a mass murderer and openly sneer at the victim?
Why did your hero block Ukraine aid and cause the death of thousands of Ukrainians?
Ask yourself: why in July 2024, Pew concluded from its polling that :
“A 62% majority of Republicans say the United States does not have a responsibility to help Ukraine defend itself from Russia’s invasion.”
Who might be responsible for that very high level of anti-Ukraine sentiment? Take a wild guess.
Move along, folks, there’s nothing to see here. It’s just the street clown having another spasm.