Putin has missed his chance to crush Ukraine

Moscow had a critical time window in which to defeat Kyiv this year. It failed thanks to the United States

Francis Dearnley

11 June 2024 •

US President Joe Biden shakes hands with Ukraine's President Zelensky as they hold a bilateral meeting

Fighter jets roar overhead, artillery booms, a crowd cries out. 

Not scenes in Ukraine, for once, but Normandy, where President Biden – surrounded by white crosses – chose to connect the conflict in Ukraine with the sacrifice his countrymen made 80 years before.

“Ukraine has been invaded by a tyrant bent on domination,” he said at the D-Day anniversary last week. “To surrender to bullies, to bow down to dictators is simply unthinkable. Were we to do that, it means we’d be forgetting what happened here on these hallowed beaches.”

While perhaps lacking the poetry of Lincoln’s address over the Gettysburg battlefield, that sentiment – that Kyiv now shoulders the burden, the cross, of Western values – when considered in light of the Russian offensive on Ukraine’s second city Kharkiv, has led to major shifts in Washington’s position on the war in recent weeks. This is now having a significant impact on the front lines.

Taken together, these shifts suggest a startling truth: that Putin may have missed his opportunity to score a decisive military victory before the American presidential election in November. In recent days alone, the White House’s decision in May to permit President Zelensky’s armies to use Washington’s advanced missiles to hit certain military targets inside Russia has paid huge dividends.

On Sunday, a Ukrainian fighter jet struck across the Russian border for the first time, reportedly destroying a “command node” in Belgorod. Also over the weekend, Ukrainian drones attacked Russian ships in the port of Taganrog, not far from the Ukrainian city of Mariupol, which Moscow controls after some of the most brutal fighting seen on European soil since the Second World War. That, too, marks a first: the first time since the full-scale invasion that Kyiv’s drones have hit a Russian target in the Sea of Azov.

But Ukraine’s most symbolic triumph was a successful strike on one of the Kremlin’s most sophisticated and expensive aircraft: a Su-57 stealth fighter jet stationed at the Akhtubinsk airfield in southern Russia.

Taken in isolation, none of these Ukrainian attacks is a strategic game-changer, but together with frequent strikes on Russian energy depots – one last week is estimated to have destroyed $540 million worth of oil – there is evidence that, logistically, Ukraine has now reached a turning point where it can no longer be overwhelmed by Moscow’s forces.

Further to Washington’s green-lighting of specific strikes on Russian soil, the other key factor is that weapons deliveries from the vital $60 billion aid package passed by Congress in April are now trickling through to the front lines. The situation is still severe, especially in light of low levels of ammunition, but while Ukrainian soldiers were once desperate, it seems that this is slowly changing. A Czech plan to deliver 1.5 million shells from across Europe is also progressing at pace.

In short, the critical window of opportunity where Moscow outmanned and outgunned Kyiv has now almost certainly passed, coming at a heavy price for Vladimir Putin politically as we approach November. His aim was to make substantive inroads into Ukraine before America went to the polls, embarrassing Biden and obliging whoever won the White House to force Kyiv into peace talks.

Instead, he faces frozen front lines, emboldening the West. Furthermore, in his speech in Normandy, Biden said that 350,000 Russian troops have now been killed or wounded since the invasion. For context, the Soviet Union lost 50,000 troops in its 10 years in Afghanistan, a scale of loss that contributed to its collapse.

It is time, therefore, to reassess the period following Ukraine’s failed counteroffensive last year. Rather than Russia making incremental gains, it should be seen as a highly effective Ukrainian defence and potentially decisive military victory.

That is very different, of course, from saying that the war is won. The F-35 jets that flew over my head in Normandy, the advanced artillery that fired blanks over Omaha Beach – neither have been donated to Kyiv, and in many ways Ukraine remains hamstrung by the half-hearted nature of Western support.

But it has survived. While its losses already far outnumber the almost 10,000 white crosses in Normandy’s American Battlefield Cemetery – likely passing 10 times that – it has held on, like those American soldiers who gained a precious foothold in France that fateful June morning, and who ultimately prevailed.


Francis Dearnley is Assistant Comment Editor at The Telegraph and one of the presenters of our daily podcast ‘Ukraine: The Latest’. With over 85 million downloads, it is considered the most trusted daily source of war news on both sides of the Atlantic.

8 comments

  1. We stopped deliveries of military aid for half a year, yet mafia land could not take advantage of it, despite getting massive help from iran and north korea. Then, Ukraine gets aid again and things are slowly changing in Ukraine’s favor. Just think where we would be at if aid to Ukraine were sufficient, with all available tools, and without ball and chains attached! Yes, the war could already be won.

    • of course the 6 month interruption of deliveries is an unbearable waste but if you had a magic wand and with it you drove the Russians back to the border would the war stop?
      what will make this scumbag poutine stop?

      • There’s no guarantee for peace, of course, but if the Russian occupiers would be driven back behind their own borders, there’s a solid chance of this triggering a reaction in Putinstan. This would put the regime at a breaking point. 3 years of war, enormous costs, huge damages, hundreds of thousands dead, millions severely injured, and NOTHING to show for it? Even RuSSians can’t be that tolerant towards a disastrously foolish dictator! 🤨

      • Since there are no real men in mafia land that dare to assassinate the pest boil, the best and surest way to stop him is to destroy his cockroach army.

    • Right, Mr. Facts, so true! Who’s responsible for preventing Putin’s exploitation of the “open window” is Ukraine and its brave defenders, not so much the US. 🤨

      • Europe can count its lucky stars that the mafia rat started his conquests with Ukraine. It’s the first and last attempt to subjugate a European country.

  2. “Moscow had a critical time window in which to defeat Kyiv this year. It failed thanks to the United States”
    The same United States which had opened that window in the first place. 🙄

  3. @gray

    probably we must already consume the “war treasure” of poutine before considering a change… so that the new ones arrive malleable and understanding with a good spirit… the desire to do differently.

Enter comments here: