Pentagon explains why US does not allow Ukraine to strike Russian territory with ATACMS

15 JULY 2024

STOCK PHOTO: GETTY IMAGES

In an interview with Voice of America, Pentagon spokesperson Major General Pat Ryder stated that the US is still concerned about the spread of war beyond Ukraine’s borders, which is why the ban on ATACMS long-range missile strikes on Russian territory has not been lifted.

Source: Voice of America, as reported by European Pravda

Details: Ryder noted that the United States just approved the use of American munitions across the border for return fire and defensive strikes. However, he emphasised that Washington’s long-range strike policy has not changed.

Quote: “I think it is important to understand that we do not want to see unintended consequences, escalation, which can turn this conflict into a wider one that will go beyond Ukraine. I think it’s something we all need to look at and take very seriously,” Ryder said.

He stressed that it is necessary to look at “secondary and tertiary consequences in terms of potential escalation” if targets inside Russia are under attack, which will not necessarily have a strategic impact.

At the same time, he stated that the US never underestimates Russia’s threat to Ukraine and would continue to work with Kyiv to ensure that the Ukrainian military has everything it needs to defend its sovereign territory and people.

US President Joe Biden, after giving Ukraine limited permission to deploy American weapons to hit Russian territory, expressed resistance to US weapons being used to strike deep into Russian territory.

Meanwhile, Ukraine wishes to expand the scope of this authorisation.

NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg emphasised that Ukraine should have the right to strike Russian territory, as this is provided for by the right to self-defence.

Support UP or become our patron!

https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2024/07/15/7465813

14 comments

  1. Major General Pat Ryder could’ve saved himself from belching so much hot gasses to tell us something we already know. Keeping it simple is best. He could’ve just said, we are spineless cowards, or we still have ruskie nose rings in our noses, or we are flaccid jellyfish, or we are pink, squishy marshmallows.
    I am deeply ashamed for this administration and these wannabe generals who shamelessly announce their cowardice in the face of a Third-world trash country.

    • Here is a quote for you :

      “Putin has built the power structure to restore the Russian empire in one way or another. Putin is megalomaniac, a sociopath, because he has no sense of the suffering he is causing to humanity.”

      Biden? Starmer? Macron? Scholz?
      Nope, it’s from the 78 year old singer of Deep Purple; Ian Gillan.

      We never hear the truth like this from leaders of the western powers, because they don’t want to upset the rat nazi.

      • That’s why I simply can’t view any of those people as leaders, scradge. They are hypocrite pencil-pushers and panty-pissing pussies, and nothing more. Sorry for the string language, but I’ve been watching their spinelessness for so long, it’s eating me up.

      • For a country that can’t even take Donbas, how the hell can it escalate across any border? It’s pitiful really.

        • “Escalation” is the code word for the capitulators in politics, what they really mean is nukes. Instead of hiding under their desks they should be out there explaining to the ruSSki bandits what will happen to them if they use nukes. And as graphic as possible. Just like children, sometimes you have to give them the consequences and let them decide if the consequences are worth the crime.

          • They could easily think for themselves if the ruskie education system was worth anything, and if their brains weren’t soaked with alcohol so much.

      • We’ll never see these pack of spineless cowards even thinking about such a thing.

  2. “Unintended consequences”. What do they think their policy is doing. Maybe they can think about the dead Ukrainians whose blood is on their hands.

Leave a Reply to foccusserCancel reply