scradge1

Opinion »Why a humanitarian intervention in Ukraine is in NATO’s interest

Why a humanitarian intervention in Ukraine is in NATO’s interest

3 comments

  1. “We need to convey a message Russia truly understands: We are willing to fight for what we believe in. Only then will Russia consider peace.”

    Exactly right. Except as we know, Nato won’t convey that message. The quisling regimes of France and Germany will ensure that and Nato’s Marxist leader Stoltenberg will take the same line as them. Only the other day, the useless fuck was blathering on about how “this war will go on for a long time.”
    Only a tiny number of Nato members in Europe have both the integrity and capability to wage war against putlerstan.
    It is up to the Budapest signatories, plus Poland to intervene decisively so that Ukraine can win quickly.

    Reply

    • I don’t think so.
      Nothing stops like-minded countries to send troops to Ukraine.
      I don’t think any country wants to wage war with Russia, including the Baltics and the UK and US.

      Reply

  2. This line of thinking has been floating around since the start of this war. Back then, it wasn’t so glaringly obvious what a loser military mafia land really has, and so it was understandable that nearly every NATO member was shaking with fear by the thought of intervening. Thus far, NATO has had just enough courage to do so with much weaker countries.
    However, for months now, we saw both the true weaknesses that the ruskie military possesses and, to boot, the despicable crimes it has and is committing. Yet, to this day, not a single NATO boot is to be seen in Ukraine, far and wide. Discussing the necessity of why NATO should intervene is superfluous. The chicken genes are too deeply embedded in this semi-useful entity. We should be glad to see the type of responses by the West that we have, as little as they are, compared to its possibilities. Sad, but true.

    Reply

Enter comments here: