Kateryna Schwartz15:57, 02.05.25
Russian missile and drone strikes, as well as fighting along the front line, have led to the deaths of far more civilians, the UN said.
The lives of Ukrainian civilians have become more at risk since the start of ceasefire talks in the war between Russia and Ukraine, according to a UN analysis , The New York Times reports .
Since the talks began in February, Russian missile and drone strikes, as well as fighting along the front lines, have killed far more civilians than during the same period a year ago, UN officials said.

“For example, 848 civilians were killed or injured in the first 24 days of April, a 46% increase over the same period last year, UN officials said,” the article says.
It is noted that Russia is targeting cities more intensively.
Analysts say that an increase in violence during ceasefire negotiations is a common occurrence in wars: When conflicts are negotiated, the warring armies tend to try to gain an advantage before a ceasefire halts the fighting. The result can be more casualties, especially in Ukraine, as the barrage of strikes overwhelms air defenses.
“I don’t think the increase in attacks necessarily means abandoning the negotiation process,” said Samuel Charap, a Russia analyst at the Rand Corporation. “There are things the military wants to achieve in order to potentially end the fighting.”
The article also notes that the pace of Russian missile and drone attacks increased after Trump’s phone call with Putin and Zelensky in February. In the 30 days following the calls, Russia launched 4,694 missiles and drones into Ukraine, compared to 1,873 in the 30 days before the calls.
At the same time, it is emphasized that it is unclear whether the increase in attacks is related to the negotiations. Russia has been increasing attacks using explosive drones for several months after the Shahed production plant went into operation last year, said Mark F. Kanchian, a senior analyst at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington:
“It’s primarily a reflection of availability. They shoot with everything they have.”
Razumkov Center military analyst Oleksiy Melnyk noted that Russia has changed its shelling tactics to intensive bombing, which “results in much greater destruction and casualties.” According to him, the goal is to create resistance to the war in Ukraine and increase “pressure on the Ukrainian government” to accept the terms of the settlement.
Russia has intensified strikes on Ukraine: UN Security Council meeting
The UN Security Council recently held a meeting on Russia’s aggression against Ukraine and its continued terror against civilians. It was reported that the meeting was initiated by France due to Russia’s ongoing strikes.
“Ukraine is committed to peace efforts. We agreed to the US proposal for a complete ceasefire 49 days ago, but Russia did not agree. This clearly shows who is interested in peace and who wants the war to continue,” the Ukrainian Foreign Minister emphasized.
(C)UNIAN 2025

Zelensky could offer to finally surrender the Crimea. The Kremlin’s response would indicate Putin’s true intentions. A refusal must result in arming Ukraine to the teeth like never before. It’s worth a try to show Washington what the ruSSian NAZIS are truly up to.
From a BBC article:
Zelensky constrained by Ukrainian constitution. Zelensky was adamant that he has no power to give up Crimea: “There’s nothing to talk about here. This is against our constitution.”
Article 2 of the constitution states that Ukraine’s sovereignty “extends throughout its entire territory” which “within its present border is indivisible and inviolable”.
Any change to Ukraine’s territory has to go to a national referendum, which must be authorised by the Ukrainian parliament.
It is not just President Trump that has problems with Kyiv. Russia also sees the Ukrainian constitution as an “obstacle” to peace efforts.
Constitutions can be changed, but not while Ukraine is under martial law.
Approving Russia’s illegal annexation would not just be a red line for Ukraine but would be a terrifying precedent for countries such as Romania that border the Black Sea. The precedent would be felt far beyond the Black Sea.
But Crimea was ruSSian until the 1950’s and not given to independent Ukraine but the Ukrainian SSR. It was even an autonomous Republic after Ukraine seceeded from the Soviet Union. There should be some reason in Kyiv to end this mess in exchange for Nato membership for example. Somehow this horrible war MUST END!
I think what is most important here, including the religious perspective, is what the people want. All Ukrainians in every corner of the nation want Crimea as part of Ukraine, including the Tartars. Besides that bro, Crimea has roots as part of Ukraine dating back to 1676. Read this article about Cossack Sirko.
I agree. My experience is that most Crimeans that I know are pro-Ukrainian. Only a couple is pro-ruskie. I know, this isn’t representative, but still a good hint.
“not given to independent Ukraine but the Ukrainian SSR.”
And then after Ukraine declared its independence, Crimea became part of independent Ukraine.
“It was even an autonomous Republic after Ukraine seceeded from the Soviet Union.”
Yes, “The Autonomous Republic of Crimea is a de jure administrative division of Ukraine” – per Wikipedia. And it could still be an autonomous republic after Ukraine reclaims it from russia.
What problems does Trump have with Kyiv as it relates to the Ukrainian Constitution?
He doesn’t care about the U.S. constitution, so why should he care about Ukraine’s.
I respect your opinion Sir Bill and I just see different facts. There is a very reliable system to take care of any president that doesn’t keep his oath or not follow the Constitution.
Sir RSM current reliability on how the system is running after so much erosion is at the point of crisis. One remedy for a president that doesn’t keep his oath or follow the Constitution is impeachment. Yet highly improbable it would make it to the floor of Congress, let alone pass the Senate. Yet administration has both ignored court rulings and circumvented Congressional power of the purse as well as created an axe agency that was neither elected nor adheres to any accountability while enriching itself. Exactly what good are we gaining from dismantling our institutions, alienating our allies, and gutting our agencies?
Not quite. The Republicans are VERY different from the Democrats. The Republicans are independent-minded and don’t vote as a bloc. If there was some corruption or criminality they would throw Trump under the bus in a second.
Because Trump doesn’t revere our own Constitution. So, him not respecting a foreign Constitution is really no surprise.
Ok, can you give an example of his corruption? Or an example when he didn’t follow the Constitution?
How’s treating court orders with contempt, and denying due process for starters .
Denying due process to who? Foreigners? That’s not how the Constitution works Sir Bill, you should know that. The Constitution is only for US citizens. Thank God.
“Denying due process to who? Foreigners? That’s not how the Constitution works”
That’s *exactly* how the Constitution works, Sir Red. You should know that.
The Fifth Amendment states that “No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law”.
Note: “No person”, not “No citizen.” This applies to *all* individuals within the United States, including non-citizens, regardless of whether their presence is lawful or unlawful.
The Fourteenth Amendment states that “No State shall…deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law”.
Note again: “any person”, not “any citizen.” This further ensures that state governments cannot deprive individuals of their rights without due process, which also applies to non-citizens.
(Of course, the trumpkov administration has also been deporting U.S. citizens with no due process…)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/immigration/2025/05/02/citizens-caught-trump-immigration-crackdown/
“Denying due process to who? Foreigners? That’s not how the Constitution works”
That’s *exactly* how the Constitution works, Sir Red. You should know that.
The Fifth Amendment states that “No person shall be deprived of life, lib-erty, or property, without due process of law”.
Note: “No person”, not “No citizen”. This applies to *all* individuals within the United States, including non-citizens, regardless of whether their presence is lawful or unlawful.
The Fourteenth Amendment states that “No State shall…deprive any person of life, lib-erty, or property, without due process of law”.
Note: “any person”, not “any citizen”. This further ensures that state governments cannot deprive individuals of their rights without due process, which also applies to non-citizens.
[Note: I had to add a hyphen in “lib-erty” so that my comment would appear. The word contains the name of a muppet who may not be named.]
Not to mention the fact that the trumpkov administration is also deporting U.S. citizens without doe process…
https://www.washingtonpost.com/immigration/2025/05/02/citizens-caught-trump-immigration-crackdown/
Per the U.S. Supreme Court:
“It is well established that the Fifth Amendment entitles aliens to due process of law” in the context of removal proceedings. Reno v. Flores, 507 U. S. 292, 306 (1993).
Click to access 24a931_2c83.pdf
Due process has been denied for U.S. citizens Sir RSM.
One, a child, whom was undergoing treatment for cancer!😠
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4g8yj2n33yo
The Constitution’s Due Process Clause protects both citizens and non-citizens from being deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.
Coincidentally, this just popped up in my feed:
https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=9889609677749134&set=gm.1787244215154602&idorvanity=204509320094774
Looks like that’s not public.
It’s the two-button meme, with one button saying, “I love the Constitution, which says even illegals get due process”, and the other saying, “Illegals don’t get due process”.
The bottom frame with the guy sweating has the guy labelled “Conservatives”.
Subversion of the justice system, violating the separation of powers, usurpation of appropriation power, dismantling Congressionally established agencies and impounding Federal funds, Abuse of trade powers and international aggression, violation of first amendment rights, Creation of an unlawful office, bribery and corruption, and to top it all off Tyrannical overreach.
On corruption:
https://www.murphy.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/murphy-six-weeks-in-this-white-house-is-on-its-way-to-being-the-most-corrupt-in-us-history
https://www.lemonde.fr/en/economy/article/2025/02/12/us-donald-trump-loosens-the-reins-on-corruption-in-the-name-of-the-country-s-economic-competitiveness_6738050_19.html
https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/trump-meme-coin-dinner-crypto-white-house-rcna204504
https://campaignlegal.org/update/trump-administration-has-opened-door-more-corruption
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/elizabeth-warren-donald-trump-100-days-corrupt_n_68111f2be4b0cbf3b6c1ddaa
https://newrepublic.com/post/194420/trump-memecoin-dinner-corrupt-president
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/sen-chris-murphy-trumps-first-100-days-he-has-normalized-corruption-must-stop
https://newrepublic.com/post/193823/trump-tariffs-corruption-insider-trading
Constitution:
https://www.hks.harvard.edu/faculty-research/policy-topics/democracy-governance/are-we-headed-constitutional-crisis-kennedy
https://theconversation.com/trumps-claims-of-vast-presidential-powers-run-up-against-article-2-of-the-constitution-and-exceed-previous-presidents-power-grabs-249662
https://www.yahoo.com/news/people-not-happy-trump-said-214720611.html
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/5250512-trump-is-laughing-at-the-supreme-court-and-the-constitution/
You see, I have given you a small number of proofs, which you have never done when I asked you.
That’s all political opinions Sir “Facts”, you know that. If any of it was real the courts would have locked him up…you know that too. What happened to you bro? Facts used to be important to you
Red, how is the sand down there?