2.03.2024 – Translated from Ukrainian via Google and OFP
In Russia, they complained about another explosion. Residents of the Krasnogvardeisky district of St. Petersburg were awakened on the morning of March 2 by a deafening explosion: according to preliminary data, an unmanned aerial vehicle exploded.
It is reported that two residential buildings were damaged as a result of the explosion, about a hundred residents were evacuated, and there were casualties. Russian propaganda media write about this, suggesting that the target of the UAV could have been the Ruchi oil depot, located within a kilometer from the site of the explosion.
The morning of March 2 began alarmingly in the propaganda media of the Russian Federation. According to reports, at about 06:30 a.m. Kyiv time, a powerful explosion was heard in St. Petersburg: propagandists said it was caused by an UAV attack, which, they claim, crashed between residential buildings, causing a fire.
“According to our data, two residential buildings were damaged,” writes one of the propaganda media pages.
Eyewitnesses told another propaganda Russian media: at first they saw a bright flash in the sky. Immediately after it, there was a powerful explosion. Particularly observant ones noticed that all this was preceded by the “sound of an engine” in the sky.
“Residents of Piskarevsky Prospekt reported that debris, presumably a UAV, crashed next to one of the houses. Previously, windows in the apartment were broken. No casualties were reported. Emergency services are on the scene,” the propagandists complain.
Their “colleagues” claim that the explosion damaged “at least 15 apartments on all five floors,” and also write that about 100 residents were evacuated from the high-rise building.
It is noteworthy that even the most notorious propaganda publications did not initially claim that Ukraine was deliberately attacking civilians. Instead, they set out to look for the reasons why an unknown drone flew into the north-eastern part of St. Petersburg and what purpose the operators had determined for it there.
And two of them found a probable answer.
“The likely target of the Ukrainian UAV was the Ruchi oil depot in the northeast of St. Petersburg – less than a kilometer from the crash site,” writes one of the channels.
The city authorities remained silent for some time. And subsequently, the governor of St. Petersburg, Alexander Beglov, confirmed that something had happened, bashfully labeling this “something” as an “incident.”
“The Ministry of Emergency Situations and law enforcement officers are working at the scene of the incident in the Krasnogvardeisky district. There are no casualties. The glazing of the balconies of two houses was partially damaged. Residents of the affected apartments were evacuated. He headed the operational headquarters. One of the priorities is to assess the nature of the damage in order to provide the necessary assistance to residents,” wrote Beglov in his Telegram channel.
But the Health Committee denied Beglov’s assurances that there were no casualties: according to a report circulated by Russian media, six people were injured, in particular, one of the victims was hospitalized due to severe stress.
Let us remind you that on the eve of March 1, people complained about “bavovna” in the Belgorod region. According to Russian media, the explosion damaged the Pantsir-S1 and injured two servicemen.
Subsequently, the disabling of the Pantsir-S1 was confirmed by the Main Intelligence Directorate. They showed vivid footage of the “demilitarization” of the Russian army on its own territory.
We have only verified information in our Telegram channel OBOZ.UA and Viber. Don’t be fooled by fakes!
“The city authorities remained silent for some time. And subsequently, the governor of St. Petersburg, Alexander Beglov, confirmed that something had happened, bashfully labeling this “something” as an “incident.”’
Such “incidents” have become quite common in mafia land, and this is good. Although better luck next time, hitting the oil depot, hitting mafia apartment buildings is not a bad alternative, psychologically speaking.