BY BRAD DRESS THEHILL.COM
The House Foreign Affairs Committee on Wednesday passed a resolution calling for the Biden administration to send long-range missiles to Ukraine, upping the pressure on the White House and Pentagon to provide a key piece of advanced weaponry that U.S. officials have long resisted sending. The resolution calls for the U.S. to immediately provide the Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) to Ukraine, which would allow Ukrainian forces to strike at targets around 200 miles away. It also calls for the transfer of similar weapons systems from the U.S. and its allies to Ukraine, saying the failure to provide long-range missiles will prolong the war against Russia.
Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas), the chairman of the House Foreign Affairs committee, said “ATACMS are critical to Ukraine’s success in the counteroffensive.” “There’s no reason to give Ukraine just enough to bleed but not enough to win,” he said. “It’s been my criticism all along – if we’re going to be helping them, either go all in or get out.” The ranking member on the committee, Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-N.Y.), also backed the resolution, saying he supported an effort to “prudently send long-range missile capabilities to Ukraine’s capable warfighters.” There was some opposition from more conservative lawmakers.
Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio) said he would not support sending more weapons to Ukraine without a defined mission behind support for Ukraine, concerned there may be a larger goal in Washington to grind down Russia and create regime change in Moscow. “When you don’t define the mission, no one can be held accountable,” said Davidson. “We owe it to the [American] men and women if we commit to a war, even a proxy war, that we define the mission before we commit to the mission.” Before the vote, committee members shot down an amendment offered by Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.), which would have changed the language to sell the ATACMS to Ukraine rather than donate the weapons. Perry said the American taxpayers did not “sign up for a war with Russia.”
“What’s happening in Ukraine is important to the world,” Perry said, but European nations “should pony up and pay the bill.” Several lawmakers said the amendment would have created a more complex and different process to support Ukraine and noted European nations have pledged billions of dollars in assistance to Kyiv. The House resolution passed Wednesday will now head over for a debate on the full House floor, where it’s expected to have wide support. Lawmakers are increasingly pushing the U.S. to provide the weaponry that Kyiv says it needs to defend itself. ADMINISTRATION CONCERNS AMID SUPPORT The Biden administration has resisted sending the ATACMS, largely over concerns that Ukraine will strike into Russian territory and escalate the war. The U.S. has carefully rolled out the transfer of advanced weapons systems to Ukraine throughout the duration of the war.
The U.K. last month became the first Western nation to transfer long-range missiles to Ukraine, providing it with its Storm Shadow missiles. France followed suit, announcing the transfer of its SCALP-EG missiles that can strike up to 155 miles away. Earlier this month, members of the For Country Caucus, a bipartisan congressional committee made up of military veterans, sent a letter to Biden urging him to send American-made F-16 fighter jets and ATACMS. The caucus also requested the expedited transfer of M1 Abrams tanks, which were announced over the winter but are not likely to arrive in Ukraine until the fall.
Similarly, Biden announced an F-16 pilot training program, but the process is expected to take months, and it’s unclear when Ukraine could operate the fourth-generation aircraft on the battlefield.
Copyright 2022 Nexstar Media Inc. | All Rights Reserved. Read more from The Hill at thehill.com

“Perry said the American taxpayers did not “sign up for a war with Russia.”
Since when has the US taxpayer ever been consulted about a war involving the US? Cut the BS and send the weapons Ukraine needs to win, not defend herself.
How heroic to be afraid of RuSSia, or anybody. Very tough and American… NOT.
Time for some bipartisanship, and I hope Biden signs the Republican resolution.
“Republican resolution”
It’s a bipartisan resolution, introduced by 3 Republicans (Michael McCaul, Tom Kean, Joe Wilson) and 3 Democrats (Bill Keating, Ted Lieu, Jared Golden).
The press release announcing it even called it a “Bipartisan Resolution”.
https://foreignaffairs.house.gov/press-release/mccaul-kean-wilson-keating-lieu-golden-introduce-bipartisan-resolution-urging-immediate-transfer-of-atacms-to-ukraine/
My statement is correct. It is a Republican led committee.
That is true.
I swear some people live to try to correct other people and they probably don’t realize how annoying they appear. It wasn’t like I said stop signs are green….
The statement that it’s a Republican-led committee is true, since the R’s took the house majority. The statement that it’s a bipartisan resolution is also true,, because it was introduced by members of both major parties.
It is really getting old listening to those few “Conservatives” complaining about funding a war in Ukraine that is slowly crippling Russia, our oldest enemy. Its out of plain partisanship and it really is rather petulant and myopic.
Isn’t this the same resolution, which would provide those missiles to Ukraine in 2024? How about sending them in early 2030. Then, the war could be over and the US wouldn’t have to bother with it at all.
If I’d paid my taxes in the same speed as this government works, I’d be sitting in jail.