France opposes EU plan to buy British Storm Shadows for Ukraine

Funds should be used to boost bloc’s domestic defence industry over Kyiv’s needs, Paris believes

A storm shadow missile on an assembly line

A coalition of EU nations has proposed making it easier for Ukraine to buy Storm Shadow cruise missiles Credit: Dan Kitwood/Getty Images

Joe Brussels Correspondent

26 January 2026

France is opposing an effort to make it easier for Ukraine to buy British Storm Shadow missiles, The Telegraph can reveal.

A coalition of 11 EU capitals has proposed loosening the rules for Kyiv to use a €90bn (£78bn) loan to buy British weapons, but France wants the money to be spent within the EU.

The current plan for the loan – two-thirds of which will be used to buy weapons for Ukraine’s armed forces – foresees prioritising the European and Ukrainian defence industries before shopping overseas.

But Ukrainian defence officials have estimated that they will require €24bn of military equipment from outside the EU this year, according to documents seen by The Telegraph.

This figure is mainly for the provision of American-made Patriot air defence systems and PAC-3 interceptors, but long-range missiles have been identified as another requirement that European nations may not be able to provide.

European officials from the coalition have identified Britain’s Storm Shadow cruise missile as a potential option to plug the gap.

Storm Shadow missile

The RAF’s long-range cruise missile is armed with a specialist penetrating warhead designed to destroy hardened and buried targets from long range. It is made to be fitted to Western-made fighter jets but can be adapted for Soviet-era aircraft.

They are proposing a four-tiered system that could effectively put the UK in front of the US, should the country be able to fulfil Ukraine’s defensive needs.

However, France had emerged as an “obvious” opponent to the proposals, a diplomatic source said.

Emmanuel Macron shakes hands with soldiers as he visits the Istres military air force base
Emmanuel Macron, pictured meeting soldiers at a military air force base in France, wants the EU to be autonomous of its allies Credit: Philippe Magoni/REUTERS

Paris is at the centre of efforts to make the EU strategically autonomous of its allies, mainly the US, because of ruptures with Donald Trump over his threats to seize Greenland.

It has argued that any funds donated to Ukraine should be used to boost the bloc’s domestic defence industry over Kyiv’s defensive needs.

This has led to internal complaints that the approach will impede Ukraine’s ability to defend itself, especially from Russia’s aerial bombardments.

Video Poster

Ukraine fires ‘UK-supplied Storm Shadow missiles’ Ian_Matveev/X

Under the scheme, Ukrainian officials would submit purchase plans, which would then be reviewed against a set of criteria.

First, the EU would establish whether Ukraine’s domestic defence industry could fulfil the orders, before exploring the bloc’s own manufacturers for potential options.

Britain would sit on a third level of the cascading system, with the US on the fourth and final tier.

The coalition is focusing its efforts on relaxing the rules to make it easier for Ukraine to purchase from the third tier, which could also include Canada and other nations with defence deals with Brussels.

“We’re trying to do two things,” a diplomatic source told The Telegraph.

“One, make sure it’s open enough for the UK to comfortably be there. Two, make sure the administrative burden on Ukrainians to reach that layer of the cascade is not so hard.”

Britain's Storm Shadow missiles in combat
Britain’s Storm Shadow missiles in combat Credit: YouTube/Ukrainian Air Force

The latest attempt to prevent French influence is being championed by the Baltic and Scandinavian states, as well as Poland, Romania, the Czech Republic and the Netherlands.

Another eight countries, including Germany, have voiced support for a more favourable approach to Britain but have not officially joined the coalition.

One of the reasons Britain is being seen as a more favourable option is its leadership of the coalition of the willing, which is planning to deploy troops to Ukraine as part of any peace settlement.

With British troops set to be serving alongside their European counterparts, and American boots absent, investing EU funds in the UK is seen as an opportunity to boost security around the wider mission.

British diplomats are said to be in talks with representatives from the EU group, but are being encouraged to increase their outreach to the European Commission and European Parliament, where France has a strong presence in security-minded committees.

6 comments

  1. Greenland is not French, and btw not an EU member. The French euronaZis have smelled blood again. But the US will recover after Trump, the EU remains a corrupt iZlamized shithole forever.

  2. Comment from :

    Merx Ultor
    This has got to be one of the most French things ever. Ukraine is fighting for its life and the French don’t want British weapons to be purchased and used in that defence.

    Doug Keith
    Spend it on Taurus KEPD-350 from Germany and Sweden, freedom for Ukraine is more important than EU sqables about if some money is spent in the UK.

    Gerald Duniec
    ‘The decision should be based on what is the best to buy that will help Ukraine repel the Russians. If thats is British then so be it. This is not an economic decision but one of making Europe safe again as quickly as possible. Macron is only lengthening the conflict.

    Anita Saye
    I can’t remember the French ever doing anything that helped Britain in my whole life.

    Roberta Davies
    Surely it’s in the EU’s best interests to provide the best defence for Ukraine, whatever it is and wherever it comes from. Not this petty three-tier rigmarole to line France’s pockets before anyone else’s, or make Ukraine waste time jumping through hoops to prove they need something from elsewhere.

    M Lane
    Quelle surprise-again. We need a smashed Russian military and economy to set them back for another generation, after which, as usual, they will be back at our throats. That is Russia, that is the way they have been for centuries.

  3. Comment from :

    John Weighell
    When I read about France and defence it reminds me of an incident.
    About 15 years ago whilst sailing in the North Atlantic I met a sailor who had been a French Naval Commander specialising in anti-mine warfare.
    We had a beer or two then he told me that at the start of the Falklands conflict French engineers were flown to Argentina to convert the Naval version Exocets to the aviation version. Apparently, Argentina at that time had practically none of this version.
    He was ashamed of this action and apologised for the loss of the lives of RN personnel.
    He apologised every time we met. I believe his story.

    alison hurst
    Reply to Simon Brooks
    I believe it to fact as I remember the press at the time. So very Sad 😒

    david pilkington
    Reply to John Weighell
    It is factual.

    John Mulvany
    Perfidious French, the front line is Ukraine or do you want foreign troops marching up the Champs Elysees again? The French think more about fish than the defence of Europe.

    Simon Brooks
    Rather than secure a peace, rather than ensure Ukraine has some great kit, yet again all the French can do is posture around like pumped up cockerels.
    This is exactly the same sulky French attitude during the second world war when just before D-Day the for ever ungrateful disingenuous De Gaulle refused to wish the SOE operatives luck when they went in before the D Day to sabotage the ability of the Germans to rush reinforcements and supplies to the beaches.
    If France wasn’t so close to us I’d be tempted to offer it in exchange for Ukraine.

  4. To prevent a needed weapon system because of money has never been an intelligent concept. It only leads to ruin.

Enter comments here: