Can Ancient HAWK Missiles Protect Ukraine From Modern Ballistic Threats? (video commentary)

08/21/2026

How many HAWK air defense systems does Ukraine actually have? And can they hit Russia’s ballistic missiles?

Ukraine has roughly 1% of the Patriot interceptors it needs heading into winter, so it’s leaning on a missile system the U.S. Army retired in 1996: the MIM-23 HAWK. I break down what HAWK can and can’t actually intercept, why nobody can confirm exactly how many the U.S., Spain, and other allies have actually delivered, and how an air-defense missile from the Eisenhower era became the thing keeping scarce Patriot interceptors in reserve for the threats only Patriot can stop.

Join the channel as a member! We’re building a global community of people who are passionate about Ukrainian victory, honoring NATO alliances, and dislike dictators as much as I do: https://www.youtube.com/@WesODonnellX

Glory to Ukraine. Glory to the heroes. Crimea is Ukraine.

  • Chapters!
  • 00:00 – Patriot shortage prompts look at Hawk
  • 01:15 – Wes introduces Hawk amid interceptor shortage
  • 01:37 – Why Hawk must shoulder Patriot’s workload
  • 02:12 – Ukraine’s interceptor deficit and Hawk’s challenge
  • 03:08 – Active shortage and Hawk’s post‑US era
  • 04:32 – Reviving Hawk and the allied patchwork
  • 06:35 – Hawk’s ballistic capability and radar dependence
  • 08:11 – Layered defense and Hawk’s role
  • 09:28 – Hawk as key to preserving Patriot through winter
  • 09:39 – Sustainment challenges reviving Hawk
  • 10:55 – Air defense overview and allied Hawk influx
  • 12:45 – Allied Hawk shipments: advocacy and uncertainty
  • 14:27 – Time as critical factor in Ukraine’s air defense

Enter respectful comments here: