
4 June 2024
Tony Diver, US EDITOR ; Joe Barnes, BRUSSELS CORRESPONDENT andDaniel Hardaker

Joe Biden has ruled out Ukraine joining Nato in the aftermath of a ceasefire with Russia in a major blow to Volodymyr Zelensky.
Ahead of Nato’s annual summit on July 9, the US president said Ukraine would have to rely on supplies of Western weapons to ward off a second Russian offensive.
Peace, he said, “doesn’t mean Nato.”
“It means we have a relationship with them like we do with other countries, where we supply weapons so they can defend themselves in future,” he told Time magazine.
Mr Zelensky has pushed for Ukraine to be granted swift entry to Nato after the war is over, arguing Vladimir Putin is likely to stage another invasion before long.
Membership of the alliance would compel the US and western nations to come to the defence of Ukraine in the event of any Russian attack, under Article 5 of the Nato treaty.
Mr Biden said: “I am not prepared to support the Nato-isation of Ukraine,” adding he had seen “significant corruption” in Ukraine when he visited as vice president.
However, he warned that the West still has a duty to prevent Kyiv falling to Russia, as it would quickly see Poland and other bordering nations “go down” too.
The possibility of Ukraine joining the alliance has become a major sticking point between Nato members since Russia’s invasion in February 2022.
At last year’s summit in Lithuania, member states agreed to a joint communique stating that “Ukraine’s future is in Nato”, but refuse to move forward with an accelerated membership plan supported by some eastern European countries.
A senior Nato diplomat said: “This will no doubt infuriate the Baltic and eastern states.”
Security cooperation
Since January, Ukraine has signed security cooperation with nine countries including the UK, France and Germany, and is in advanced negotiations with several other states.
German and American diplomats have recently expressed concern about moving further along the path to Ukraine’s membership at next month’s meeting in Washington DC.
Russia has recently made advances in the Kharkiv region and is expected to launch a major summer offensive in the near future.
Last week, Antony Blinken, the US secretary of state, said that members would “put in place the bridge to bring Ukraine closer and ultimately into Nato”, but did not give detail on the conditions required for membership or on a time frame.
Mr Biden’s intervention expunges any hope for Ukraine to be offered Nato membership in exchange for ceding territory to Moscow in a peace deal.
In absence of a concrete offer on membership, plans are being drawn up for Nato to take over control of the US-led Ramstein group that has coordinated much of the western military aid for Kyiv.
Jens Stoltenberg, Nato’s secretary-general, has also proposed a commitment to maintain at least €40 billion (£31.3bn) in annual support for the war-torn capital, as part of the plan to make the country more compatible for a future membership bid.
Diplomats and officials involved in the talks are aware that this will fall short of what Volodymyr Zelensky expects on membership, even though he has been warned he would be “ill-advised” to kick up a fuss at the Washington summit.
Mr Biden has previously spoken of his desire to avoid US soldiers coming into direct conflict with Russia, something that could presage an escalation into nuclear war.

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again; Ukraine must wait for NATO membership when there is a real president sitting in the Oval Office and not this spineless goofball.
With Biden opposing Nato membership, the course has to be towards speedy EU integration. That at least gives Ukraine limited security support in the future. 😕
He’s just prolonged the war. Possibly for years.
What goes on in Biden’s lizard brain? He might as well join the magaputler shitheads and have done with it.
Ukraine cannot survive as an independent sovereign nation without allied troops on the ground and planes in the air.
The only solution is for a European coalition consisting of the Scandies, the Balts, Poland, Czechia and Romania to provide this resource and hope that France and the UK can be persuaded to join.
Right, Scradge, that’s a huge screwup. Even if Biden doesn’t want US troops to fight in Ukraine in a Nato defence situation in the future, he should have left the question open instead of making his appeasement to Putin public. As far as I remember, this ambiguation, essentially ‘maybe some day, but not now’ is Scholz’ stance, and it’s at least more reasonable than Biden’s. And please note how “gaffe machine” Joe added insult to injury by reinforcing Russian propaganda about corruption in Ukraine! The effing president of the US – best democracy money can buy – totally ignores that this corruption was largely driven by criminal Russians and that the young democracy has made significant progress in recent years. That’s really rich, coming from a jerk whose own drug addicted, useless son has exploited the bad situation if the past for enriching himself, without delivering anything of value in return! 😠
I’ve written it many times – Biden’s not really a friend of Ukraine. His grandstanding about supporting the defence of democracy is phony. His half-assed, weak-hearted arms deliveries confirm this (consideration of Patriot batteries still ongoing?). That’s a problem for Ukraine, but there’s nothing that can be done about it. The other guy on the ballot, the convicted felon, ain’t any better. ☹
Btw, Biden badvicer (!) Jake Sullivan announced the consideration of an announcement:
“‘I think you can expect over the next few weeks an announcement of further deliveries of significant capability to Ukraine,’”
https://charter97.org/en/news/2024/6/5/597721/
No word if Patriot batteries will be included. 🙄
We can return the problem in all directions, there is no possible security for Ukraine without a third party’s nuclear deterrent.
Everything else is just chatter aimed at finding short-term solutions favoring the electoral destiny of certain political figures, but not the survival of Ukraine.