Biden has gone wobbly on Ukraine

President Joe Biden has offered a lackluster response to new evidence of Russian war crimes in Ukraine. Contrary to the conspiracy theories offered by some, the evidence for these atrocities is abundant and clear.

Yet, when asked by a journalist on Monday what sanctions he would propose in reaction to Russian atrocities, Biden could do no better than “I’ll let you know.”

This callous contrast with U.S. allies is notable. Facing credible evidence of the Russian rape, torture, and murder of hundreds of civilians in the Kyiv suburb of Bucha, President Emmanuel Macron of France has called for an end to European imports of Russian oil and coal. Supported by his Green Party coalition partner, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz has hinted he will support such a step. Also on Monday, France and Germany expelled dozens of intelligence officers from the respective Russian embassies in their nations. At the same time, Britain is leading calls for the delivery of longer-range artillery and anti-ship weapons to Kyiv. These would enable Ukrainian forces to destroy Russian logistics convoys more effectively.

So if even the normally hesitant French and Germans are ready for far tougher action against Moscow, why is Joe Biden so afraid to do the right thing?

In his inaugural address, Biden claimed that he would “repair our alliances and engage with the world once again, not to meet yesterday’s challenges, but today’s and tomorrow’s.” Well, here is his chance. The great foreign policy challenge of the age is upon us. It is the struggle between violent Russian imperialism and Ukrainian democratic sovereignty — the outcome of which China is watching closely and weighing its plans for the conquest of Taiwan. This is a struggle that Beijing and Moscow both openly admit will help shape the 21st-century international order.

So why is Biden dropping the ball?

Biden doesn’t appear to recognize the historic stakes at play. Throughout the Ukraine crisis, Biden has shown a willingness to let Russia force his hand rather than vice versa. He has repeatedly slow-rolled the delivery of more advanced weapons to Ukraine, then limited the quantity of weapons supplied. As an example, the United States recently delivered a small but highly capable aerial combat drone to Ukraine. But it only delivered 100 of these “Switchblade” weapons. That limited number reflects the White House’s obsessive focus on not overly aggravating Russia. At what point will Biden realize that is now a moot point?

Biden should be looking for every possible way to help Ukraine send the Russians into full flight, to force Putin into negotiations that put him at a disadvantage. Biden knows quite clearly what that would entail. Ukraine, now well into its second month of war, has made it clear to him.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky wants more ammunition for anti-tank and anti-air systems that troops can carry with speed and deliver with devastating effect. He wants longer-range artillery systems, more drones, and armored units that can punch through the Russian front lines and force the continued retreat of those forces. Replacement fighter jets also loom large, though the reticence of NATO members to provide aircraft to Ukraine remains a sticking point.

On the diplomatic front, Ukraine wants a far more comprehensive approach to isolating Russia from the international community. It wants the oligarchs stripped not only of their yachts and mansions but of their assets held in foreign shell accounts and businesses — including in Israel. It wants Russian ships forced to float around the oceans, unable to dock, deliver, repair, or resupply. He wants Russian diplomats expelled at scale — something that the Biden administration has been unwilling to join European powers in doing. It wants Russia to be made a pariah in practice, as well as in words.

Ukraine wants Vladimir Putin to understand that he cannot win — that the more the Russian president insists on salvaging some meager victory, the greater the risk to his military, his power structures, and Russia’s economy.

But Biden, despite having the power to make this happen, seems intent upon drawing defeat from the jaws of victory. He must find the courage to make a better choice.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/editorials/biden-has-gone-wobbly-on-ukraine

7 comments

  1. “But Biden, despite having the power to make this happen, seems intent upon drawing defeat from the jaws of victory. He must find the courage to make a better choice.”

    Biden is proving to be as inept as Obama when it comes to dealing with Russia. If he lets Putin get away with this genocide, every other two bit dictator will see that the US are no longer a superpower, but a toothless tiger. The Chinks will roll into Taiwan knowing the US will do nothing.

    • Biden is screwing Democrats too. The longer this atrocity goes the closer it gets to the November midterm elections. Currently, Biden’s approval rating on Putin’s war with Ukraine is just 42%. Its a shame it is even that high.

  2. The infamous comment of Bush 2, who “looked into his eyes and saw a soul”, was a disaster. He must have meant “saw an asshole.”
    When the history books are written, those in the west who caused this terrible war should be named and shamed. Bush, Sarkozy, Hollande, Merkel, Obama, Trump and Biden.
    Bush did nothing about Georgia, Sarkozy gave 20% of it to putler and then commissioned an EU report that blamed the 2008 invasion on Georgia!
    Hollande and Merkel gave away Crimea and part of the Donbas, Obama factored out the handling of the 2014 crisis to Biden, who then went about securing a sinecure for his degenerate son!
    Trump thought it was a brilliant idea to repeatedly praise the nazi rodent, which unbelievably he has still been doing even after the genocide began. Biden promised “unwavering support” and proceeded to provide the exact opposite.

  3. Too contrast Bush, Senator McCain got it right when he said “when I looked into Putin’s eyes, all I saw was…KGB”. So many signals and yet the west does nothing. Biden is a tragedy.

  4. As for Biden, his hesitancy may be due to Yelena Baturina, the Russian olygarch who gave Biden’s son $3.5mil for who knows what. She is not on the list to have her assets frozen here.
    Trump sent weapons early on while Obama sent blankets.
    Trumps comments on Putim were misinterpreted. He was comparing Putin to our current very stupid administration, saying he outsmarted them.
    Trump killed the pipeline, (Biden passed it), bombed Syria when Russia was helping Assad gas people and Russians were killed, told Putin when he was in office if you set foot in Ukraine I will bomb Moscow. Putin said you wouldn’t. Trump said those beautiful gold turrets will be ashes. You notice Putin did not invade till Trump was gone. He did under Obama and Biden. What does that tell you? Trump saved Ukraine from being attacked through his standing up to Putin. He also warned Europe from buying Russian oil, deepening his war chest. He insisted European countries build up their militaries as he did ours. Only for Biden to leave the Taliban $84bil in weapons in Afghanistan Ive read they sold much of it to Russiam. He did much for Ukraine and Europe. They didn’t listen. Biden is no friend of Ukraine. His son is about to be indicted for money laundering in Ukraine, Russia, China and others. Trump will be back next election if not sooner.

  5. “But Biden, despite having the power to make this happen, seems intent upon drawing defeat from the jaws of victory. He must find the courage to make a better choice.”

    Biden not only lacks the courage to be a good president, but also lacks any other positive trait for this position. He is as qualified to be POTUS as a janitor is to lecture on astrophysics.

Enter comments here: