
If Republicans continue to block U.S. military aid to Ukraine, the White House could turn to an ally to provide Kyiv with ATACM missiles capable of striking Russian-held Crimea.

A live-fire testing of an early version of the Army Tactical Missile System at White Sands Missile Range, N.M., in 2021.John Hamilton / White Sands Missile Range Public Affairs file
Feb. 19, 2024
MUNICH — After months of requests from Ukrainian officials, the Biden administration is working toward providing Ukraine with powerful new long-range ballistic missiles, according to two U.S. officials.
Late last year, the U.S. began to supply Ukraine with Army Tactical Missile Systems, known as ATACMS, but so far it has provided only the older medium-range ATACMS. Now, the U.S. is leaning toward sending the longer-range version of the missile, the officials said, which would allow Ukraine to strike farther inside the Russian-held Crimean Peninsula.
But U.S. funding for arms shipments to Ukraine remains uncertain because of opposition from former President Donald Trump and his Republican allies in Congress. Last week the Senate passed a $95 billion foreign aid package for Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan. But it’s not clear whether or when the GOP-controlled House will vote on the measure or whether it would survive the vote.
For months, pro-Trump Republicans have said they will approve U.S. military aid to Ukraine only if the Biden administration agrees to a package of GOP immigration and border security measures. Trump and his House and Senate allies this month rejected a bipartisan border security and immigration compromise negotiated by Republicans and Democrats in the Senate.
Defense officials told NBC News that the U.S. has a limited inventory of ATACMS and that it is not likely to send them to Ukraine without money to replenish U.S. stockpiles.
If Congress approves more funding for Ukraine, the U.S. could include the long-range ATACMS in one of the first packages of military aid paid for with that money, according to the two U.S. officials. The U.S. also has ammunition and artillery ready to send to Ukraine immediately if the funding is approved, the officials added.

The officials did not rule out asking allies to provide the missiles to Ukraine, as well, and replenishing their ATACM stockpiles.
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
In a statement, a Defense Department spokesperson said: “Without a supplemental [funding bill], we do not currently have a security assistance package to give to Ukraine. At the same time, I won’t speculate on the contents of any future packages if a supplemental were to be passed. We will let you know if this changes and if we have a new package to announce.”
Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba said he spent much of his meeting with U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken in Munich on Saturday discussing Ukraine’s need for longer-range weapons.
“I just came here from a meeting with Secretary Blinken,” Kuleba told a small group of reporters in Munich on Saturday. “I spent a very good part of the time arguing in favor of ATACMS,” he said, explaining that Ukraine needs the version of the missile that can fly 300 kilometers, or more than 180 miles.
“There is only one way to destroy Russian capabilities in Ukraine. It’s to hit deep into the occupied territories, bypassing Russian radio electronic warfare and interceptors,” he said, referring to long-range ATACMS.
Kuleba called the systems “an important symbol” to Ukrainians. “If you want to hit behind the lines, disrupt their logistics and supplies, destroy their depots of ammunition, you can do it only with long-range missiles,” he said.
The Biden administration has resisted sending the long-range missiles over the past two years because officials worried Ukraine would use them to strike inside Crimea or Russia and cause Russian President Vladimir Putin to escalate the conflict. White House and Pentagon officials have expressed similar concerns about other weapons systems but have now decided to provide them to Ukraine.
On Saturday, Kuleba also described an urgent need for more European weapons and assistance for Ukraine, saying many people in Europe are “still reluctant to understand the threat.”
“When a citizen of Europe reads in the news that Ukraine retreated from Avdiivka, he should realize one simple fact: Russia has got a few kilometers closer to his own home,” Kuleba said. “Every advance Russia makes in Ukraine brings Russian weapons closer to the home of a middle-class European.”
Kuleba praised support from European allies but said they need to speed up production of weapons and ammunition for Ukraine.
“It took Europeans too much time to start ramping up or waking up or dusting off their defense industries,” he said. “We will pay with our lives throughout 2024 to give your defense industries time to ramp up production or new lines.”

Courtney Kube is a correspondent covering national security and the military for the NBC News Investigative Unit.

Just do it. The situation is critical. Even Kherson is at risk. Trumpkov is winning the war for putler.
Europe ; step up. Germany: send Taurus, like fucking now. U.K. and France : more Storms.
Trump talks drivel about Navalny :
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-breaks-silence-navalny-casts-no-blame-putin-2024-02-19/
Just so you know, Biden is president, not Trump. Secondly, the highly compromised Biden doesn’t need Congress if he wants to support Ukraine, he can send any surplus weapons or ammo he wants. He can even declare them to have zero value so there would be no reimbursement.
“highly compromised”?
There is no evidence of that.
^bert
That’s willful blindness on your part but that’s to be expected from someone who’s religion is politics.
Despite our differences. You are my friend. Never forget.
As am I
JUST DO IT!
After two years, Team Bixen is “leaning” towards doing the right thing. Judging by the pace of development, we can’t expect a decision before this one term presidency ends. /irony
I could’ve and should’ve happened a long time ago already. This war would’ve moved in a more positive direction.
But, in the race between the two snails, Biden and Scholz, Biden is taking a lead in long-range weapons delivery by a hair.
True. Scholz is doing cover-your-ass politics – he won’t lead, but carefully stay in Biden’s shadow, with his back to the wall.
Scholz is known to be an indecision maker in Germany. Right? 😉
C’mon, they are long overdue.
What are they waiting for?
^bert
It is amazing that once again Biden is talking about sending weapons that were first being discussed being sent not long after the 2022 invasion!!!! Wow this is really idiotic and indicative of the incompetence of the administration and the Pentagon. After the gross incompetence shown during the debacle of the Afghanistan withdrawal why would anyone be suprised?
What is it with US politicians of all stripes that they want to get involved in wars but then fiddle fart around and don’t send the amount of resources necessary in any kind of timely fashion. Our elites which are suppose to be the experts in every field are all morons. But the elites never pay any personal price for their gross incompetence, but the rest of America does or in this case the poor, brave Ukrainian people.
As quoted in the article but should have also been said about the US –
“It took Europeans too much time to start ramping up or waking up or dusting off their defense industries,” he said. “We will pay with our lives throughout 2024 to give your defense industries time to ramp up production or new lines.”
Pray for Ukraine.