---

Russia conquers Luhansk, again, demands Donetsk by yesterday, bombs civilians at noon, and calls it momentum. Ukraine keeps exposing how much of Moscow’s war is bluff.

PROF. BONK 🇺🇦

APR 02, 2026

Luhansk Again

Russia has now conquered Luhansk so many times that it ought to come with loyalty points.

On April 1, the Russian Ministry of Defense announced that Russian forces had seized all of Luhansk Oblast. Again. Sergei Shoigu already claimed that prize in July 2022. Leonid Pasechnik repeated it in June 2025. Vladimir Putin later said Ukraine held only 0.13 percent of the oblast. By now, the province has been liberated so often that one begins to suspect the Kremlin’s preferred military strategy is clerical.

The point was never really Luhansk. The point was atmosphere. Moscow wants the war to feel over before it is over. It wants the map to look closed, the argument to look exhausted, and Ukraine to look unreasonable for refusing to cooperate with its own disappearance. The Kremlin has become attached to a magical theory of history in which repetition can substitute for achievement.

Ukraine, unhelpfully, keeps answering with facts. The Third Assault Brigade said its troops were still there, still holding the last lines of defense in the region. DeepState showed the same settlements still unoccupied. The brigade said Russian forces had launched 144 assault attempts near the Luhansk-Donetsk boundary over the previous six months and lost up to 260 personnel doing it. That is not a conquering empire. That is a drunk trying to annex a barstool.

Volodymyr Zelenskyy then explained what the performance was really meant to support. Russia, he said, was demanding that Ukraine withdraw from the rest of Donetsk Oblast within two months or face harsher terms in negotiations. Dmitry Peskov replied with the self-possession of a calendar having a breakdown. Zelenskyy should decide “today,” he said. Better still, he should have decided “yesterday.” Another Russian official improved the line with “the day before yesterday.”

That is the whole Russian sales pitch now. Announce the victory. Demand diplomatic payment in advance. Treat battlefield failure as an accounting inconvenience. Moscow is selling inevitability on credit. Ukraine keeps asking to see the books.

Noon Becomes a Weapon

Russia’s newest tactical refinement is not subtle. It is administrative.

Ukrainians had learned, because civilians under bombardment eventually learn whatever they must, to organize their nerves around the nighttime strike. So Russia added office hours. Between the evening of March 31 and the evening of April 1, Russian forces launched 700 drones against Ukraine in two waves, one overnight and one in daylight. The first involved 339 drones, around 200 of them Shaheds. The second involved 361 more, around 250 of them Shaheds. More than 80 drones were reported in Ukrainian airspace in the early afternoon, many heading west.

The details were ugly in the especially Russian way, petty, needling, and somehow proud of it. In Cherkasy Oblast, four civilians were killed when a drone warhead that had landed in an open area detonated as locals approached the crash site. Elsewhere in the same oblast, bus passengers were injured by debris. A child was among the wounded in Poltava. In Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast, critical infrastructure was damaged, and around 11,000 customers lost power. In Zakarpattia, more infrastructure was hit. Earlier, overnight, Lutsk and Khmelnytskyi had already been struck, with residential buildings and a Nova Post terminal among the targets.

That is what the Russian war effort looks like in pure form now. Not maneuver. Not surprise. Not decisive battle. The occupation of ordinary life. Do not merely hit the power plant. Make the bus ride provisional. Make lunch feel foolish. Teach civilians to look at noon the way they once looked at 2 a.m.

The timing sharpened the obscenity. On the same day, Zelenskyy and Ukrainian officials were speaking with American negotiators about an Easter ceasefire, and Kyiv proposed a mutual pause in strikes on energy infrastructure during the holiday. Russia answered with more Shaheds, including in broad daylight. Ukraine proposed a ceasefire. Moscow replied with an anti-lunch policy.

Iran has been using a related trick against Israel, spreading smaller salvos through the day to keep normal life repeatedly interrupted instead of singularly shocked. Russia appears to have noticed. If people adapt to one emergency, add a second shift. If they learn the rhythm of danger, change the beat until fatigue itself becomes terrain.

There is a particularly Russian cruelty in that logic. Night attacks make home feel provisional. Day attacks make the routine feel stupid. Go to work. Why. Wait for the bus. Why. Walk into an open area. Why. It is not enough to strike the infrastructure. The goal is to make daylight itself seem gullible.

Ukraine’s reply has been anything but theatrical. It intercepts, repairs, reroutes, and returns to work. Moscow wants the day to feel occupied. Ukraine keeps stuffing life back into it.

---

The Front Refuses the Script

The battlefield, meanwhile, keeps declining to behave like a surrender pamphlet.

Ukrainian forces recently advanced near Yarova, northwest of Lyman, in northwestern Hryshyne near Pokrovsk, and east of Zaliznychne in the Hulyaipole direction. Russian troops kept attacking in the expected places, but many of the supposedly dramatic gains turned out to be infiltrations, raids, or flag-raising episodes that did not change the forward edge of battle.

That last maneuver is becoming one of the war’s darker comic forms. A handful of Russian troops slips into a marginal position, raises a flag, films the moment, and the clip begins its online career as proof that Ukrainian defenses are collapsing everywhere at once. The Russian flag is now sometimes less a marker of control than a costume rental for empire.

Near Kostyantynivka, north of Pokrovsk, and in western Zaporizhia, several such episodes appear to have been exactly that. The camera says breakthrough. The map says no. Moscow increasingly fights one war in the mud and another in post-production.

The style of Russian assault tells on it, too. In the Slovyansk direction, a Ukrainian brigade reported that Russian troops mounted a platoon-sized motorbike assault using 16 motorcycles in several small groups. Ukrainian forces destroyed all 16 motorcycles and killed 32 servicemen. In the Hulyaipole direction, Russian commanders were again reportedly sending motorcyclists through kill zones, as though the answer to a drone-saturated battlefield were some sort of patriotic scooter doctrine. Somewhere in the Russian chain of command, a man looked at drone warfare and chose mopeds.

Even some Russian commentary has backed into the same conclusion. A failed mechanized assault near Grishino was offered as proof that columns no longer reliably reach their objectives because drones peel them apart on the way. The age of armored certainty has yielded to the age of very expensive humiliation.

That hurts Russia more than Ukraine because Russia is the side claiming momentum. Oleksandr Syrskyi said on April 1 that the Pokrovsk direction remained the most active across the theater and that Ukrainian forces had stopped simultaneous Russian attacks on several settlements there. He said they had destroyed Russian forces near Hryshyne and struck them near Myrnohrad. Ukrainian air defenses also reported that 89.9 percent of Russian missiles and drones launched in March failed to reach their targets.

Nobody living under these barrages would confuse that figure with comfort. But a country that can still deny nearly nine-tenths of the incoming aerial assault after years of bombardment is not a country awaiting administrative liquidation because Peskov found a planner.

Nor is this only about defense. Russian advances have slowed since the start of 2026. Years of control over most of Luhansk have not produced the triumphant march on Slovyansk or Izyum that the Kremlin’s press office keeps trying to invoice in advance. The Russian military keeps announcing geography as though geography were momentum. Ukraine keeps making it expensive to move from the noun phase into the verb phase.

Russia wants the world to picture a front waiting to collapse. Ukraine keeps making Russia pay cash for every line of that fiction.

---

Ukraine Hits the Cash Register

Ukraine has become more direct, more methodical, and more imaginative about reaching into Russia’s wallet. Good.

On April 1, the Ukrainian General Staff said Ukrainian forces struck the Strela Joint Stock Company in Bryansk Oblast, a facility involved in producing cruise missiles for the Russian military. If a factory helps build the things that flatten cities, it has joined the argument.

Ukraine kept hitting the Baltic oil infrastructure tied to Ust-Luga and Primorsk. NASA heat anomaly data still showed activity there on April 1. Planet Labs imagery showed damaged storage tanks at Ust-Luga and smoke from tanks at Primorsk. Ukrainian officials stressed that strikes on key bottlenecks can disrupt larger refining and export networks. It turns out that even a petrostate remains awkwardly dependent on places where the petroleum is not supposed to be on fire.

The campaign kept moving. On April 2, drones reportedly struck the Bashneft-Novoyl refinery in Ufa, roughly 1,300 kilometers from Ukraine’s northeastern border. Earlier strikes had reportedly hit a chemical plant in Samara Oblast and the oil and gas terminal at Ust-Luga for the second time in a week. In occupied Crimea and in occupied parts of the Kherson and Zaporizhia regions, officials acknowledged power disruptions after overnight attacks. They called it “technological disruptions,” which is how a refinery fire sounds after passing through legal.

Rosneft’s own results supplied the financial comedy. Net income fell 73 percent in 2025. Revenue dropped 18.8 percent. EBITDA fell 28.3 percent. Igor Sechin called the year a “perfect storm” of sanctions, taxes, high rates, logistics costs, low prices, a strong ruble, and Ukrainian strikes against energy infrastructure. Freight from the Baltic to India, he said, had risen above $20 a barrel, around ten times the level seen in 2022. Sechin now sounds like a man filing an insurance claim on a car he drove into a lake.

The wider world keeps threatening to rescue Moscow from the consequences of its own conduct. The war in the Middle East has sent energy prices higher, potentially boosting Russian oil revenue and improving the outlook for Russian exports of aluminum, fertilizer, and wheat. The global system keeps rediscovering, at the least convenient possible moment, that outlaw commodity states remain annoyingly useful when everything else is on fire.

That only raises the stakes for Ukraine’s strike campaign. If outside crises are going to keep handing Russia accidental relief, then Ukraine has every reason to keep applying deliberate strain exactly where the empire pretends to be strongest. Moscow keeps insisting it is a fortress. Ukraine keeps checking whether the fortress is mostly pipes.

That is true at sea, too.

Russia’s shadow fleet looks less like the navy of a great power than a maritime tax scam with delusions of grandeur. Reporting described aging vessels moving sanctioned oil with the help of modern Western technology, including Starlink. Ukrainian sailors said they were recruited through WhatsApp calls from British phone numbers, signed documents remotely, and boarded ships whose ownership vanished into layers of intermediaries in places like China, Namibia, and Oman. On some vessels, ordinary sailors reportedly had tightly rationed internet access while captains retained broad communications with owners and handlers. The empire, it turns out, has Wi-Fi classes.

Crew was reportedly paid in cash or cryptocurrency, often Tether. Some tankers conduct ship-to-ship transfers offshore with transponders switched off, then sit at sea for weeks or months waiting for clients. The Bella-1 case made the whole enterprise feel almost too perfect as an emblem. The vessel, later renamed Marinera, had been sanctioned over allegations involving illicit cargo for a Hezbollah-linked company. During a U.S. pursuit in the Caribbean, it reportedly tried to evade capture by renaming itself and switching to a Russian flag while Moscow dispatched a submarine to escort it. Crew accounts described burned documents, deleted communications, onboard “problem solvers,” and the belief that becoming Russian in the middle of a chase might somehow change the legal weather.

That is not geopolitics. That is a floating tax scam with a flag.

---

Russia Starts Eating Tomorrow

Russia’s manpower story has moved beyond body counts into something more revealing and uglier. It is now about what sort of state consumes students, convicts, and provincial poverty to keep a stalled offensive looking alive.

Reports indicate that the Kremlin is leaning on universities as part of a covert mobilization. Faridaily said a source close to a university rector reported that Science and Higher Education Minister Valery Falkov told major universities that at least 2 percent of male students should sign Defense Ministry contracts. Technical schools may face similar pressure. Other documents reportedly suggest that the Defense Ministry wants to recruit tens of thousands for its Unmanned Systems Forces from students, drone-course graduates, former aviation personnel, and women with relevant training. Ryazan Oblast has reportedly pressed businesses to produce employees for contracts as well.

Healthy volunteer systems do not usually go shopping in lecture halls.

Ukrainian commander Robert Brovdi said Russian recruitment in March remained below Russian battlefield losses for the fourth straight month. Even if the estimate is not exact, it fits the visible pattern. The Kremlin is no longer surfing on patriotic enthusiasm and signing bonuses alone. It is rummaging under the furniture cushions.

The convict pipeline is worse. Russia has repeatedly used convicted murderers and rapists to fill its ranks, and the social consequences are now visible at home with nauseating clarity. Military courts reportedly handled 729 murder cases involving servicemen between 2022 and 2025, compared with just 67 in the preceding four years. Sexual violence and robbery involving servicemen also rose sharply. The anecdotal reporting is grim enough to make satire feel indecent. A serviceman allegedly kidnapped a woman from a crisis shelter, demanded beer and cigarettes as ransom, and then strangled her. Another case involved the abduction, sexual abuse, and murder of a nine-year-old girl by a man who had reportedly fled from his unit. Men convicted of hideous murders have been permitted to sign Defense Ministry contracts to escape prison. “Special military operation” now does so much moral laundering it ought to be sold by the drum.

The downstream stories are more damning because they are so ordinary in their indignity. A man from Yakutsk described how his second cousin signed a contract from prison, was wounded, discharged, and then pressured back toward service through the resurrection of an old case and the offer of another contract instead of punishment. Inside the unit, he said, soldiers paid bribes for leave, body armor, and even ammunition. “We’re just meat,” the soldier reportedly told him.

That may be the single most honest recruiting slogan Russia has produced.

Poverty is not an accident here. It is part of the machinery. The same Yakutsk account stressed that poor regions were mobilized first and remain especially vulnerable to contract pressure because there are so few civilian alternatives. Russia has discovered a bleakly efficient formula. Neglect a place long enough and eventually its sons become inventory.

Igor Strelkov described a “civic patriotic society” that supports the front but receives “only kicks” from the state. Because this society consists of patriots and statists, he argued, it cannot respond to the state with reciprocal kicks without harming the war effort and the state itself. Another Telegram message vowed to remain on the platform, refuse migration to the one “being promoted everywhere,” and declared, “We are the resistance.”

It takes a very special regime to make some of its own militarist loyalists sound like aggravated dissidents because the censorship rules are inconveniencing their app settings.

Reports suggest the FSB may begin monitoring Russian IT companies for VPN use and stripping benefits from firms that appear too interested in the open internet. Telegram restrictions come and go in the usual Russian style: lifted because the platform is “actively cooperating,” then reintroduced with a catch. A state that cannot reliably defend its ports is very eager to defend itself from encrypted messaging. The order of priorities is hard to miss.

A wounded veteran, Andrey Soroka, described struggles to secure treatment, surgery, housing, benefits, and even access to his own funds after bank restrictions followed donations sent to help him. A missing soldier’s wife in Krasnodar reportedly had a taxi driver demand 10,000 rubles to return a folder containing documents related to her husband after she left it in his cab. He allegedly insulted her and mocked her missing spouse as well.

Sometimes state decay does not arrive as theory. Sometimes it arrives in the form of a taxi driver extorting a grieving woman for paperwork confirming the war has eaten her life, too.

Ukraine does not merely face a larger country. It faces a country willing to eat tomorrow in order to finance today, and willing to call the chewing patriotic.

---

The World Finds a New Excuse

Ukraine’s other problem is that great powers are forever discovering fresh reasons to make someone else’s survival contingent on a different emergency.

This week’s excuse was the Strait of Hormuz. Reporting indicated that Donald Trump threatened to disrupt weapons flows for Ukraine through NATO’s procurement mechanism to pressure allies into helping reopen the strait after the U.S. and Israel attacked Iran. European capitals resisted direct participation. Mark Rutte reportedly scrambled to keep the alliance from becoming an especially expensive shouting match.

Then the rhetoric escalated. Trump called NATO a “paper tiger” for refusing to help reopen Hormuz and suggested American membership was now “beyond reconsideration.” He reportedly planned to say he was considering leaving the alliance, even though U.S. law requires congressional involvement for such a move. Marco Rubio, who once helped write that safeguard, now sounds like a man being cross-examined by his own browser history. Keir Starmer replied that the war in Iran was “not our war,” while insisting that NATO remains indispensable.

Moscow must have watched this with the mixed emotions of a rival comic hearing someone else steal the premise.

For Ukraine, the implication is plain and ugly. Patriot interceptors are under heavier demand in the Gulf because of Iranian attacks, but they remain essential to Ukraine against Russian missiles. Rubio said supplies had not yet been diverted, but he also made clear that if American needs come first, American materiel stays home. That is not reassurance. That is arson with a briefing memo.

The wider Middle East crisis may also boost Russian revenues, distract Washington, and tempt more people to treat Ukraine as the old fire in the next room. If that happens often enough, every revisionist power on earth learns the same lesson. Start enough blazes, and eventually the fire brigade begins lecturing the first victim about water discipline.

That is why the Kremlin keeps selling inevitability so aggressively. If Western attention is thin, bluff becomes more valuable. If allies are arguing about Hormuz, perhaps Donetsk can be turned into a scheduling dispute. If NATO can be called a “paper tiger,” perhaps Russia’s own paper victories can pass for the real thing.

---

Folding Chairs

But here again, Ukraine keeps wrecking the conversion.

Russia remains dangerous. Nobody living in Ukraine has the luxury of mistaking Russian absurdity for harmlessness. This is still a state that can launch 700 drones across one day and night, flatten civilian infrastructure, feed men into suicidal assaults, coerce students toward contracts, and keep large parts of its war economy functioning through fraud, smuggling, and intimidation.

But Russia is weaker than its rhetoric, and Ukraine keeps making that weakness visible.

It lives in the space between the third conquest of Luhansk and the awkward fact that Ukrainian troops are still there. It lives in the space between demands that Donetsk be surrendered today and Russia’s repeated inability to seize it by force. It lives in the space between 700 drone strike waves and a society that still intercepts most of what is launched at it, still proposes Easter ceasefires while being bombed at noon, still reaches deep into Russian energy infrastructure, and still refuses to say the lines Moscow has assigned it.

That is the Kremlin’s real problem. Ukraine keeps forcing Russia to show its work.

And the work keeps looking shabby. A “special military operation” carried by convicts, calendar theatrics, and rust-bucket tankers running on Starlink. Ports on fire. Oil bosses are whining about a “perfect storm.” A military transport plane crashed into a cliff in Crimea because of what officials say was a technical malfunction, as though even gravity has become insubordinate. Loyalist propagandists calling themselves “the resistance.” Men who praise state strength by day and ask in private where, exactly, the strength has gone.

The war is not a joke, but the empire keeps writing bad ones about itself. It captures Luhansk again. It demands Donetsk by yesterday. It terrorizes civilians at noon and calls it leverage. It insists that everyone else acknowledge inevitability while spending half its energy manufacturing the atmosphere in which inevitability might be mistaken for fact.

And once an empire starts demanding applause for the same conquest the third time around, what you mostly hear is folding chairs.

© 2026 Prof. Bonk 🇺🇦🇺🇸