Russia Has Just One S-500 Air-Defense System. It Arrived In Crimea Amid A Storm Of Ukrainian Rockets.

Don’t expect fantastic results from the experimental S-500.

Jun 14, 2024

The S-500 during testing.
RUSSIAN DEFENSE MINISTRY

After apparently losing parts of several of its best S-400 air-defense batteries to Ukraine’s American-made Army Tactical Missile System rockets—the vaunted ATACMS—Russia got desperate.

According to Ukrainian intelligence chief Kyrylo Budanov, the Russians recently deployed part of their first, and apparently only, new S-500 air-defense system.

The S-500 protects the Kerch Strait from a site in Russian-occupied Crimea, Budanov told Ukrainian media. The Kerch Bridge, which spans the strait, is one of the Kremlin’s main supply lines into occupied southern Ukraine.

The S-500 has been in development for more than a decade—and the timeline for completion keeps getting extended as wartime demands sap resources from the Kremlin’s research and development budgets. Full-scale use is currently slated for 2025.

The deployment of the incomplete S-500 battery to Crimea underscores how dire Russia’s air-defense problem is on the peninsula. Budanov was kind in his own assessment. “This will be an experimental use,” he said.

Don’t expect great results. The S-500, as it exists right now, is a modest improvement over the older S-400. Lately, Ukraine’s ATACMS have been taking out S-400 batteries once a month or so—steadily chipping away at the Russian air force’s pre-war inventory of around 50 such batteries.

On paper, an S-500 battery includes three radars—two of which are identical to the radars that cue an S-400. The third radar, the 77T6, is optimized for detecting fast-moving ballistic missiles—like ATACMS. But the 77T6 is just a few years old and shrouded in mystery.

The 77T6’s capabilities “remain unknown,” Thomas Withington explained in a 2022 report for the Royal United Services Institute in London.

The 77T6-cued S-500 probably works best with a special missile that the Russians also optimized for ballistic targets like the American-made ATACMS. This 77N6 was originally meant to be a “hit to kill” missile—that is, a missile without a warhead that destroys its target by literally running into it.

The principle behind a hit-to-kill missile is that, by removing the warhead, you make the missile lighter, more maneuverable and more accurate. Many of the U.S. Army latest air-defense missiles are hit-to-kill models.

But according to Defense News, Russian industry has struggled to source the precision electronics it would need to produce hit-to-kill missiles. So while the prototype S-500 has test-fired at least one 77N6 missile, the 77N6 currently has a warhead. It’s not a hit-to-kill missile, so it’s not the specialized anti-missile interceptor the Kremlin promised to deliver.

In other words, the S-500 is probably not as effective as it could be against the very weapon that’s been harrying Russian air-defense batteries in Crimea—and which compelled the Kremlin to do something, anything, to reinforces its aerial defenses on the peninsula: the 1.5-ton, precision-guided ATACMS, each of which scatters hundreds of lethal submunitions over a wide area.

Any one of those submunitions can disable a delicate system like an S-400 … or S-500.

Follow me on Twitter. Check out my website or some of my other work here. Send me a secure tip

Sources:

1. Kyrylo Budanov: https://x.com/MaluVFX/status/1801365326635876455

2. Royal United Services Institute: https://rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/commentary/defending-mother-russias-skies

3. Defense News: https://www.defensenews.com/industry/2023/10/05/where-is-russias-s-500-air-defense-system/

David Ax

https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2024/06/14/russia-has-one-s-500-air-defense-system-it-just-arrived-in-crimea-amid-a-storm-of-ukrainian-rockets/?ss=aerospace-defense

5 comments

  1. We’ll see how this newest superest duperest air defense system stacks up against the ATACMS. I’ll place my bet on the latter.

    • I believe I read that this S500 gadget has an effective range of 2,200km so what difference would it make if it was stationed at the bridge or somewhere else in occupied Crimea?

      • Well, Red, we know what to think when the roaches make any claims. Maybe we can reduce the S-500’s range to one tenth and be closer to the truth.

Enter comments here: