foccusser

Oksana Bashuk Hepburn: With friends like Germany, Ukraine needs no enemies

We can still call ourselves human when we come to our neighbor’s aid despite a psychopath villain threatening his existence and, perhaps, ours too.

Such human gestures came recently from the little Baltic states, Poland the Czech Republic, Denmark, Canada, and others most importantly from the United States. All committed to helping Ukraine with arms against Vladimir Putin’s crazy war and demented hallucinations blaming the West for threats to Russia’s security. Such human gestures lift the spirit and show that Russia does not own all nation’s souls.

The same cannot be said for Germany. Its leading citizens like ex-chancellor Gerard Schroeder are exceptionally well-paid Russian opportunists. Chancellor Angela Merkel was its political enabler. Their dangerous moves, to both Germany and Europe, are best illustrated by their gung ho determination to build the unnecessary Nord Stream 2 with Russia.

Here’s the point. If Germany’s leaders are handing over their own and Europe’s energy security to Putin they certainly will sell Ukraine’s interests to him for the right price. It’s incomprehensible that in 2022 Germany shows so little concern about the possibility of precipitating another genocide — over 130 thousand Russian troops on Ukraine’s borders—despite its historic record of another crime against humanity, the Holocaust. And promises of “never again.”

History shows its desire to partner with Russia’s despots. In 1939, both dictators — Hitler and Stalin — started a war intending to occupy then share Ukraine. Today, Germany maintains its inherent anti-Ukraine stance by denying it membership in NATO, refusing to send it weapons, and blocking others from doing so by banning arms transfer through Germany.

Given Putin’s determination to obliterate Ukraine, Germany’s stance is equal to is selling its soul and turning itself into an Untermensch, a subhuman.

There’s more. The depth of Germany’s connivance was demonstrated again last week. Rather than be part of a united worldwide pro-democracy and pro-Ukraine stand against Putin, its political leaders, including Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock, Vice-admiral Kay-Achim Schönbach, and Defence Minister Christine Lambrecht disgraced themselves with insufferable pro-Russia comments forcing the US Secretary of State Antony Blinken to run damage control among western allies.

This pro-Russia bias is most worrisome as Germany is one of four participants in the Minsk peace arrangements. Produced after Russia’s invasion of Donbas in 2014, Minsk has favored Russia while Germany played a lead role in making this happen. The last straw was the Steinmeier formula. It tried tipping Russia’s occupation in its favor by allowing elections in Donbas while Russia’s troops occupied Ukraine.

This led to public outrage against capitulation in Ukraine. President Zelensky had to declare that there would be no elections at gunpoint. Further progress of the loathsome formula stopped.

At the upcoming Paris meeting, Ukraine needs to be most vigilant again. It must use the occasion to insist that going forward Minsk is irreparably flawed and a new peace plan is required. Its composition must reflect a better balance. It needs to seek participation by those who know Russia best and have the most to lose from its aggression like Poland and the Baltic states. Those in a conflict of interest situation, like Germany, must recluse themselves. The talks must have a neutral moderator. Great Britain comes to mind; Canada and Japan might be contenders. Ukraine must stay away if the U.S. is not a participant.

Just like the US and NATO are pushing back Russia’s untenable demands for its “security guarantees’, Ukraine must advocate for itself by refuting the Minsk agreements and their devastating violations by Russia. Among them are the ongoing killings by Russia’s occupational forces, the escalation rather than pull-back of its troops, the abduction of civilians, and the torture of political prisoners.

This time, the peace plan is to include the punishment of the guilty party or it will be worthless as the previous one. Most importantly it must specify the date of Russia’s withdrawal from Crimea and Donbas. June will do…

To succeed, it’s vital for the plan to stipulate the penalty for non-compliance.

To ensure that Russia knows we mean business, the new peace plan needs to have enough teeth to prevent non-compliance from occurring. This means warning Putin that his greatest fear can come true: Russia’s failure to withdraw from Crimea and Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts by the specified date means automatic membership for Ukraine in NATO. And, of course, considerable sanctions.

Oksana Bashuk Hepburn: With friends like Germany, Ukraine needs no enemies

25 comments

  1. “This means warning Putin that his greatest fear can come true: Russia’s failure to withdraw from Crimea and Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts by the specified date means automatic membership for Ukraine in NATO. And, of course, considerable sanctions.”

    A very good article, but the plan would never work. The Krauts, French and others will block it, unless they are removed from NATO and left to defend themselves, which might be the best solution. Trim down NATO, remove excess garbage and Putlerites, then make Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova part of NATO.

    Reply

  2. When does it sink in that NATO membership for Ukraine isn’t going to happen in the next 25 years?

    Every member has a veto and members cannot be removed.

    Reply

      • Then there would be no more US in Europe anymore either.

        The US army cannot operate in Europe without western Europe infrastructure like the ports etc.

        That was one of the reasons Germany is in NATO, without Germany there won’t be a NATO either (now do you understand why Biden doesn’t want to upset the Germans?)

        Reply

    • But members can also be put under sanctions. Happened to Turkey. Such sanctions can also be economic sanctions launched by members outside of the Nato framework. Biden may not do it, but his successor definitely would. Membership does not entitle to compromise Nato and its goals. And members who work against the principles of Nato can well be excluded.

      Reply

      • US sanctions against Germany would trigger immediate counter sanctions by the EU.

        That’s one rabbit hole the US certainly won’t want to go down as that would spell the end of the dollar as reserve currency.

        Reply

        • Uhm. Not really. But US sanctions and EU counter-sanctions could send the Euro downe the shitter, in particular sanctions against Nordstream 2. Therefore Germany will come back to reason and stop sabotaging Ukraine and Nato.

          Reply

    • If it is another 25 years I think Ukrainians can wait. No problem. The important thing for the imperialists to remember is that Ukraine is returning to her European history and rejecting the repression of the past. Ukrainians are tired of Russian corruption and I doubt there will be another Yanukovych and if there is, he/she will end up in the same predicament and run back home to the Russia.

      Reply

    • It won’t happen until Germanystan gets a real government. What you have now is a circus show. The whole world is shaking its head and laughing at you. You are the biggest cowards on the globe.
      Having said that, I hope that the US, Britain, Poland and the Baltics, together with Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia will form a new defense organization. Let’s face it, without us, NATO is pretty much useless.

      Reply

  3. Millions of people across the globe have learned something new about Germanystan. They have learned that this country is trashy, pro-Putin, which means pro-crime syndicate, and that it is the most cowardly of nations. Germanystan and most krauts disgust me to no end. I despise such people, who have no courage, no pride, no honor and no brains.

    Reply

Enter comments here: