16 AUGUST 2023
Stian Jenssen, the head of the NATO Secretary General’s Office, has referred to his proposals to discuss Ukraine’s membership of the North Atlantic Alliance in exchange for territorial concessions to Russia as a “mistake.”
As reported by Norwegian VG, Jenssen noted that his statement was “part of a broader discussion about possible future scenarios in Ukraine. I should not have spoken about it in this way.” “It was a mistake,” added the NATO official.
He pointed out that his statement from the previous day regarding “membership in exchange for territory” needs clarification after causing a media uproar.”
If – and I emphasised, if – you get to the point where you can negotiate, the military situation on the battlefield, who controls what, will play a central role and will certainly have a decisive impact on what the possible outcome of this war will look like,” Jenssen mentioned.
Therefore, Jenssen pointed out that “it is extremely important that we support Ukraine with what it needs.”
Furthermore, the head of the Secretary General’s office mentioned the necessity of providing Kyiv with “security guarantees” to not let the events from 2014 and 2022 happen.
Jenssen specifically underscored that it is Ukraine that should decide under what conditions it will be ready to start negotiations with Moscow and what those negotiations will be about.
On Tuesday, Stian Jenssen, Director of the Private Office of the NATO Secretary General, had suggested that Ukraine could potentially join the Alliance in exchange for territory. However, he emphasised that such a decision should be made by Kyiv alone.
The Ukrainian Ministry of Foreign Affairs called such discussions “absolutely unacceptable,” emphasising that they contribute to the Russian narrative.
You must be a moron to think up such a brainless idea. My question is, how does such a moron get such a high position in NATO?
Ask Stoltenberg, he should know.
Does a moron know enough to explain why another moron is a moron?
Asshole should be fired. No apology can make up for such a blunder.
I’m not even sure it was a blunder Sir Cap. This is what he said when he was supposed to be cleaning up his mess:
“if – you get to the point where you can negotiate, the military situation on the battlefield, who controls what, will play a central role and will certainly have a decisive impact on what the possible outcome of this war will look like,”
He’s STILL talking about negotiation results shaping the outcome. IMO, NATO’s position should be, “Putin invaded, Putin must go home.” But leave it to the NATO pension club to compete with the UN on uselessness……………
That jerk is just one reason why NATO simply cannot be trusted.
Ukrainian troops served in Iraq and Afghanistan as part of NATO troops. Yet NATO now rejects the same forces to join.
Just fuck NATO. They are being proven to be outdated by Ukraine’s superb military effort, and they don’t like that at all.
Anna calls his apology bullshit. https://youtu.be/g7TZAFLdY7A
It is bullshit. This was not only bullshit, it was brainlessness. A person in such a high position should not be tolerated to be brainless.