Share this news from Ukraine Today .org:
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
- Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
- Click to print (Opens in new window)
“We will destroy Kadyrov’s devilish regime and Putin’s imperial regime. We will struggle every day and spread terror against [their supporters and agents] inside and out.”
Excellent! Now form more battalions. There will be many volunteers in the Caucasus region.
Lol! I reported this on the 21st. With the number of reports that we post, it’s very easy to repeat some articles. Maybe Red has a solution to this?
Sorry. Obviously I missed it somehow, or mixed it up in my mind with another similar article.
But it’s no problem. If a story’s important, it’s worth repeating anyway.
I spend a lot of time outside in the open air. If I get an alert on my phone that grabs me, I’ll read it asap, send a link to contacts and put it up here.
No harm done. I guess we must pay more attention so as not to bore our readers with repeats. 🙄😆😉
I don’t see any problem at all facts. If it’s important, it can be repeated. Even in error!
There is an excellent FB page called “Boycott Russia Today.” It runs a carefully curated range of articles culled from the world’s press. All vary from good to indispensable. They will often deliberately repeat old articles as a refresher for existing readers and to attract new readers.
I saw an old one recently by Prof Tim Snyder, one of the most knowledgeable historian/Kremlinologists out there.
I will repost it too. Anything by the prof is always instructing, informative and hopefully influential too.
“They will often deliberately repeat old articles as a refresher for existing readers and to attract new readers.”
I guess that’ll work. Never looked at it this way. I was simply embarrassed when I did it.
No, sorry, I don’t know a way around it. I agree with you both.