Shift to Air Defense War in Ukraine Prompts US to Rethink Aid

Fire Direction Specialists with 5th Battalion, 113th Field Artillery Regiment, North Carolina National Guard, fire the M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS) during Western Strike 22 at Orchard Combat Training Center, Idaho, June 4, 2022. HIMARS are part of the U.S. military aid package to Ukraine announced June 23. Army National Guard photo by Staff Sgt. Jordan Hack.

The attempt by Ukraine to hold the eastern city of Sievierodonetsk ended June 23 as the Biden administration announced another $450 million in military aid, including four additional HIMARS rocket systems, to help strike Russian artillery as unmanned aerial systems have grown ineffective against Russian air defenses.

“Air defense is a key area that we’re very much focused on,” a senior defense official said at a June 24 Pentagon press briefing meant to highlight new security assistance authorized by President Joe Biden.

“Initially, it was that short-range air defense that we were providing in massive quantities. But we quickly shifted our focus to seeing how we could bolster and enhance Ukraine’s existing air defense capabilities,” the official said. “We are still looking at how we can continue to help the Ukrainians build out those systems. And it is a priority area.”

Early in the Russia-Ukraine war, United States and allies flooded the country with Stinger short-range air defense systems, most effective against slow-moving targets. After making trips to the region, Defense Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III also helped facilitate the transfer of Soviet-era S-300 missile defense systems from Slovakia, while the United States and allies backfilled the country with Patriot missile defenses.

Despite Russia’s superior numbers and more sophisticated jets, Ukraine used the air defense systems to prevent Russia from taking control of the skies.

“Even though there is that substantial Russian threat, Ukraine has denied Russia air superiority,” the DOD official said. “The Ukrainians have been remarkably skilled in operating their air defense systems.”

At an AFA event June 24, Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall went further, saying Russia’s Air Force has been “absent” in the Ukraine war.

“The Russian Air Force has been absent from the war to a large extent, and it’s because they’ve been intimidated by the … air defenses the Ukrainians have been able to use tactically pretty successfully,” Kendall said.

The result has been more than 100 days of contested air space.

U.S. and partner assistance to Ukraine has shifted of late, to include artillery for the ground battle grinding out in the flat, Donbas region of eastern Ukraine.

Defense packages now worth more than $6.8 billion have included 126 155 mm howitzers and [260,000] artillery rounds. The long-delayed approval of High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems (HIMARS) has led to eight systems donated so far, four of which are being used by Ukraine in the fight. The new systems are expected by mid-July.

But for as little as the Russian gains have been in recent weeks—as little as a few kilometers a day—reports indicate that Ukraine’s effectiveness has also diminished.

“Reinforced Russian air-defense systems in eastern Ukraine are increasingly limiting the effectiveness of Ukrainian drones, undermining a key Ukrainian capability in the war,” read a June 22 assessment by the Institute for the Study of War, which has closely tracked the conflict since it began Feb. 24.

Ukraine made sizable purchases of Turkish Bayraktar drones prior to the conflict.

The 30-foot-wingspan Bayraktar has destroyed Russian artillery and tanks with laser-guided bombs.

To supplement Ukraine’s effective unmanned air strategy, DOD has transferred 700 Switchblade tactical unmanned aerial systems, Puma UASs, and 121 of the Air Force’s Phoenix Ghost UASs. To strengthen the air picture, DOD transferred 22 counter-artillery radars, four counter-mortar radars, and four air surveillance radars.

But Russia has begun to stymie Ukraine’s UAS advantage by beefing up its S-300 and S-400 air defenses on the Russian side of the border, reports Foreign Policy Magazine.

The Pentagon declined to comment on the UAS report, and a Ukrainian defense official did not immediately respond to inquiries from Air Force Magazine.

The DOD official who briefed media called Ukraine’s retreat from Sievierodonetsk a “managed retrograde” to a better defensive position after more than 90 percent of the city had been destroyed by Russian artillery.

“When you look at the sweep of the past four months, obviously, we’ve seen Russia having to completely recalibrate its plan,” the defense official said, referring to Russia’s failed multi-pronged attack on Kyiv that was later reduced to a full assault of the eastern Donbas.

Russia’s concentration on eastern Ukraine has slowly garnered it 20 percent of Ukrainian territory, with strikes now beginning again in northern Ukraine along the Belarusian border.

“It’s important to reflect on the cost that Russia has paid for this very small, very incremental gain,” the Pentagon official said. “What we see is they have these gains around the edges, and you have a fierce Ukraine that is fighting back with the world by its side.”

@Air Force Magazine

7 comments

  1. “Air defense is a key area that we’re very much focused on,”

    This is very encouraging. It means that the US is not only twiddling its thumbs, like the dregs in Paris and Berlin, but thinking about ways to help Ukraine. Many measures, I’m sure, we won’t ever know about, or when they have already come to pass.

    “The Ukrainians have been remarkably skilled in operating their air defense systems.”

    We hear this all the time!
    Certainly, a lack of training on an unknown weapon system is only a small excuse not to hand them over to Ukraine. They’ve proven to be very, very clever and resourceful in learning and implementing that knowledge to the fullest.

    “It’s important to reflect on the cost that Russia has paid for this very small, very incremental gain,”

    That is crucial. No army in this world can suffer such attrition for such minimal gains for long. Maybe the Chinese army could, since they have people like ants, but not mafia land, who’s already scrapped the bottom of every barrel it has.

  2. Bottom line is : shitloads of orcs are going to have to be smoked every day, till the air is stinking with their foul orc carcasses.
    That means shitloads of MLRS’s are required.
    Veth posted a list of cities attacked by the putinazis throughout the night. Mykolaiv is another one. It has been pounded to fuck ever since its brave defenders kicked out the vermin twice.
    It is getting hit by long range artillery, sub-launched cruise missiles and air to ground attack planes.
    It must be given an adequate air defence system right now.
    Furthermore, Kherson must be retaken asap.
    The allies should grit their teeth and abandon their non-intervention policy and hit Russia’s air defences inside RuSSia.
    Ukraine should be given the wherewithal to turn Belgorod into Mariupol.
    The putinazis demand the right to murder Ukrainian children in any city whenever they like, whilst expecting Ukraine to just take it?
    Lots of RuZZians are going to have to be killed in order to stop fuher putler’s devilry.

  3. I don’t understand this crap that Ukrainians can’t attack Russia, the source of the barrages. Geez it’s a real stupid condition for us to get the MLRS.

  4. Conditions on MLRS are stupid, but Ukraine never made that promise with any other system being provided

What is your opinion?