How Russia wins

Kremlin’s EU gamble seems to be working

30 May 2022,

Wolfgang Münchau

Wolfgang Münchau

It is still too early to predict the outcome of the war in Ukraine. Russia has certainly solidified its position in the east and is making small military gains. What’s become clear over the last few days is that Russia may, after all, be able to achieve at least some of its military goals.

Here is an interesting, albeit disturbing, political scenario by Sabine Fischer, a senior fellow at a German foreign policy tank. She notes that the mood in Moscow itself has shifted. It is the Kremlin’s political calculation that the western nations will not sustain their massive financial and military support for Ukraine. The German government is prioritising its commercial relations with Russia – as it always has done – while pretending to stand with Ukraine

The longer the war drags on, the more tired Europe will become. By the autumn, just before the start of the winter, the Europeans’ priority will be to secure gas from Vladimir Putin. The Russian read-out of the telephone conversion with Karl Nehammer, the Austrian Chancellor, says that Putin has reaffirmed Russia’s contractual obligations with regard to gas supplies. When Mario Draghi called, Putin even went further: he guaranteed fail-safe natural gas supplies to Italy at contractual prices. Putin deals with EU leaders one at a time. Not much there has changed.

This idea of shifting priorities seems like a reasonable calculation from the Kremlin. Fischer goes further by combining these observations with potential political shifts in Ukraine itself as the war drags on. If Moscow succeeds in sustaining a full occupation of the Donbas for any length of time, Russia may feel encouraged to go for Odessa and possibly Kyiv.

“They can also rely on political instability in Ukraine which may bring down the Zelensky government – because a defeat in the Donbas and possibly the annexation of the occupied territories would make them extremely unpopular in the rest of [Ukraine].

Her comments are directed at the German government and its de facto refusal to supply arms to Ukraine. Olaf Scholz is playing a double-game, pretending to be supportive of Ukraine. Yesterday he gave a television address directed at Ukrainians in which he told them that Germany was on their side. At the same time, his office is frustrating promised weapons deliveries. Germany has not delivered any weapons since March. His comments are probably directed at the gullible German media, always pro-government, regardless of whoever is in power.

For anyone looking at this from the outside, especially from Ukraine, the game Scholz plays is pretty obvious. The German government is prioritising its commercial relations with Russia – as it always has done – while pretending to stand with Ukraine as part of the EU and Nato’s consensus. It’s the old east-west double-game that Germany has been playing since the days of Willy Brandt. The Russians are gambling that the EU will return to its political status quo: weakness caused by division between the member states.

Now imagine for a second how this scenario would play out in the EU if Russia were to annex the Donbas and take Odessa. The political recriminations within the EU would become unbearable. The relationship between eastern European countries and Germany is ​already as bad as at any point in living memory. It would get much worse if Ukraine was even partially defeated. More people in eastern Europe would ask themselves if it is in their interest to be part of a union that is run for the commercial interests of Germany. As members of Nato, they don’t need the EU for their own security. On the contrary, EU membership binds them into policies that might be detrimental to their security interests.

German mercantilism is unsustainable. Either German politics will bring it to an end, which it shows no signs of doing, or it will lead to the fragmentation of the EU.

This article was first published in the EuroIntelligence morning briefing. For a trial subscription click here.

WRITTEN BYWolfgang Münchau

Wolfgang Münchau is a former co-editor of Financial Times Deutschland and director of Eurointelligence.


  1. Schroeder: RuSSian agent.
    Merkel : Russian agent.
    Scholtz: Russian lackey.
    Sarkozy : Russian agent.
    Hollande : Russian lackey.
    Macron : Russian lackey.

    France and Germany were never going to admit Ukraine into Nato and never will. Likely they will drag their heals about Ukraine’s EU ambitions indefinitely.
    Germany has delivered nothing useful to Ukraine since the start of putler’s holocaust.
    Ukraine must know that France and Germany covertly work for the interests of Russia, whilst Hungary does it blatantly.

    Liked by 3 people

  2. “Kremlin’s EU gamble seems to be working”
    For a brief couple of weeks after the start of the war, I thought that the West had finally found its courage, had finally seen the futility of endless blathering with the crime-ridden rat, had finally seen the importance of having a strong Ukraine, standing between them and mafia land.
    I was wrong on all counts.
    No, never in my life have I ever been so thoroughly disappointed in the West … except for a small handful of brave nations. We all know who they are. We also know who the usual spineless cowards are. Not need to re-chew that mouthful of dog shit.
    I hope that, after our victory, Ukraine will find a way to get revenge.

    Liked by 3 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.