Putin’s Main Failures

Natalia Tolub. Dec 20, 2021

Russian President Vladimir Putin failed to make his country an independent player in international politics, put Russia in a position subordinate to China, and damaged relations with the West and Ukraine. Timothy Snyder, a world-renowned historian and professor at Yale University, made a corresponding statement at the Kyiv Security Forum.

“What Mr. Putin has done with the invasion of Ukraine, and all of the storytelling about the invasion is to cut Russia off from the West, entirely unnecessarily, and put Russiaessentially in a position of being a country subordinate to China. That is Mr. Putin’s foreign policy ‘achievement.’ Looked at with a cold eye, it seems very much like a foreign policy failure,” he said.

Snyder underlined that Putin’s actions cut Russia off from Ukraine and damaged relations for decades to come.

“That is something which is essentially unsayable in Russia, at least in public policy circles. And that is that Russia cut itself off from Ukraine. The whole thesis of Mr. Putin’s essay is that Russia and Ukraine should be together, but by some mysterious conspiracy of Western actors they’ve been held apart. The truth is actually much simpler than that. The truth is right in front of our eyes,” the historian believes.

The reason that Ukraine and Russia are not close is that Russia invaded Ukraine. In other words, if Putin’s goal really was to have Russia and Ukraine in friendly relations, it is no one else but precisely he who has made it impossible. Not just for the duration of his own regime, but for years and decades thereafter. It is Putin himself through his foreign policy, through his actions, through his choice to invade Ukraine, who has made close Russian and Ukrainian relations impossible.

“Now, this is unspeakable, this is something that cannot be said, and, therefore, Mr. Putin has to indulge in this long, historical fantasy which allows him to say, ‘No, no, it wasn’t me, it was the West. It doesn’t have to do with something that just happened, my invasion of Ukraine. It has to do with some kind of long historical fable’,” the Yale University professor noted.

He believes that Putin is the aging leader of a despotic regime that has failed on its own terms. It has failed to bring Russia and Ukraine closer together. On the contrary, by invading Ukraine, Russia has insured Ukrainian enmity for a long period of time. So, at this stage of Putin’s career, what is left is to cover up these failures with a lie.

Absence of Russia in its history

According to Snyder, Putin’s famous essay expressing his own attitude about Ukrainian and Belorussian and Russian history is entirely without merit, historically speaking.

“When I read it as a historian, the feeling I have is the same feeling I have when, for example, at a cocktail party I’m forced to speak to someone who has a very strong conviction about something in the past, but doesn’t really know what he’s talking about,” Snyder says.

According to him, one has to take Putin’s reflections seriously “not as history, because as history they’re laughable. But one has to take this seriously as politics.”

“What we notice, when we read this essay with care, is that it’s really about an absence. It’s about the absence of a story of Russia. There is no story of Russia that Mr. Putin is able to tell. What he is able to tell is a story about some kind of encounter with Ukraine which somehow for mysterious reasons went wrong,” Snyder underscores.

What this reveals is just how early Russia is in the development of its own national story. The way that Putin tells his story, Ukraine and Belarus are kind of crutches. Russia is unable to tell a story about itself, and so the story that is told relies upon other people’s.

The second thing we notice about this story is that this is not the story about the future, it’s a story about the past. And here we see something characteristic about Putin’s regime: there is no future in the way that Putin talks about Russia, there’s only a past, a mythical past.

Snyder highlights that this is a characteristic problem of the Putin regime. In an oligarchy or in a kleptocracy, or plutocracy, where all the resources are captured by a few elites around the center of the regime, it’s very difficult to talk about the future. In the historian’s opinion, the problem is that the story doesn’t have Russians in it.

“So, when we read this essay in the context of Russian invasion and occupation of Ukraine what it’s basically telling us is that Russia invaded Ukraine because Russians do not yet know who they are. And this story – and this is a terrible thing for Russia – the story is entirely negative,” Snyder said.

So, what Putin is creating for Russia is a kind of identification that is mythical, that is located in the past, and that is entirely negative. It’s entirely dependent upon other people rejecting what Russians say about themselves and about the rest of the world.

Natalia Tolub

6 comments

  1. The Budapest signatories have chosen to renege on their obligations. A bitter pill for Ukraine to swallow. There are children growing up now who have never known anything but war and of course tragically many have lost mothers or fathers to putinazi bestiality.
    It is highly unlikely that Ukraine or Georgia will join the EU or Nato. Russia lackeys France and Germany will continue to block indefinitely.
    Ukraine has no choice but to go onto a wartime economy and put 20-25% of annual GDP into the armed forces.
    What is going on in Ukraine? There are putinazis on the border yet time is found for treason charges to be prepared against Poroshenko? If they are true, the moon is made of cheese and the oceans consist of jam.

    Liked by 3 people

  2. “The truth is actually much simpler than that. The truth is right in front of our eyes,”
    We have recognized the truth and spoke about it ever since the rodent stole the Crimea. We have seen other truths too, in which the West plays a deplorable role. It is not only mafia land who has created a reprehensible foreign policy, our so-called leaders have also painted themselves into a corner by their bad decisions, starting with constant appeasement of this crime syndicate. With all of our foresight, should we all be professors of history or politics? Being in positions of leadership would be more our calling. If so, I’m sure that we wouldn’t have 100,000 mafia troops before Ukraine’s doorstep right now.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Had we been in charge, this would have been over in 2014, and Putler would have been back in his kennel. Thanks to Merkel and Obama, Ukraine was thrown under the bus. To make matters worse, Merkel and Putler then colluded to cut gas transit from Ukraine altogether, which should have resulted in Merkel tossed in prison.

      Liked by 3 people

    • We are superior, yet always in reverse gear. Putin is weaker, yet always full speed forward. Putin dares to threaten us, yet our losers only appease him. Cowardice and political correctness belong in the garbage bin, not our governments.

      Liked by 3 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.