UK unlikely to send troops if Russia invades Ukraine, says defence secretary

Minister’s comments come days after Boris Johnson warns Russia of ‘significant consequences’

PA Media. 18 Dec 2021

It is highly unlikely that Britain or its allies will send troops to defend Ukraine if it is invaded by neighbouring Russia, the defence secretary, Ben Wallace, has said.

US intelligence claims that Russia has stationed about 70,000 troops near the border of Ukraine and has begun planning for a possible invasion as soon as early next year.

Wallace and the Ukrainian defence minister, Oleksii Yuriyovych Reznikov, issued a joint statement on 16 November which said they were “concerned” by Russia’s military buildup.

“The United Kingdom stands shoulder to shoulder with the people of Ukraine and will continue its longstanding determination to support them,” the statement added.

But in an interview with the Spectator, Wallace said Ukraine “is not a member of Nato so it is highly unlikely that anyone is going to send troops into Ukraine to challenge Russia”.

“We shouldn’t kid people we would. The Ukrainians are aware of that,” he added, in comments carried by the Times before the interview’s publication.

Asked if that meant Ukraine was on its own, Wallace said: “We can all help with capacity building but to some extent Ukraine is not in Nato and that is why we are doing the best diplomatically to say to Putin don’t do this.”

It comes days after Boris Johnson told the Russian leader, Vladimir Putin, there would be “significant consequences” for Russia if it invaded Ukraine.

The prime minister spoke by telephone to Putin on Monday to reassert the UK’s commitment to Ukraine’s territorial integrity and warn that any destabilising action by Moscow would be a “strategic mistake”.

The Kremlin has denied preparing an invasion and has accused the government in Kyiv of stoking tensions in the region by deploying new weapons.

The two countries have been at odds since 2014 when Russian forces annexed the Crimean peninsula and backed a separatist rebellion in eastern Ukraine.


  1. Ben Wallace has been a good friend to Ukraine. Now it seems he’s done a Biden and washed his hands of the matter.
    Both Budapest signatories seem absolutely determined to ignore their clear obligations from this agreement. I suppose if pushed, they will say that it was not a treaty and there is no legal obligation. Which in my view makes us almost as slippery and untrustworthy as the Franco-German putler alliance.
    I am ashamed of both countries. If Ukraine can’t depend on us, who else can they turn to?
    The little poisoner and his butt boys are all laughing at our weakness and treachery.

    Liked by 4 people

      • The only acceptable response is a joint statement on the lines of:
        “Ukraine should know that we, as the Budapest signatories, will be by your side defending your homeland in the event of a further invasion by fascist Russia.”
        They aren’t going to do that so the only acceptable alternative is that they must immediately prioritize and provide FOC ALL the weaponry requested by the Ukrainian military.

        Liked by 2 people

  2. Would it be possible for some countries to send in troops outside of NATO capacity? Of course! But, this would require a set of balls. Who in the West has balls? That’s right, hardly no one.
    How about sending Ukraine LOTS of weapons and ammo? Of course. But, this also requires a set of balls. And so on and so forth…

    Liked by 3 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.