Time to stop appeasing Putin and confront Russia’s imperial ambitions

UkraineAlert

December 2, 2021

By Paul Grod

Thirty years ago this week on December 1, 1991, Ukraine drove the final nail into the coffin of the Soviet Union when more than 90% of Ukrainians backed a referendum on the country’s declaration of independence.

The collapse of the USSR was in many ways remarkable as it happened so quickly and took place largely without bloodshed. However, it has since become increasing obvious that Russia never really came to terms with its reduced status or the loss of empire.

Unfortunately, a new generation of Ukrainians, Georgians, Moldovans, and Belarusians currently find themselves forced to defend their freedoms as Russian President Vladimir Putin seeks to reassert his country’s old imperial influence. Meanwhile, nations in nearby Central Europe are also facing up to the return of a hostile Russia.

The epicenter of this new Cold War is Ukraine.

Since 2014, Russian aggression in Crimea and eastern Ukraine has taken the lives of more than 14,000 Ukrainians and forced millions to flee their homes. While the front lines in the east have remained largely static since 2015, Ukraine continues to suffer regular casualties. Meanwhile, around 7% of the country is under Russian occupation.

Ukraine’s December 1991 referendum was in many ways as significant an event as the initial declaration of independence which took place a little more than four months earlier. While the parliamentary declaration is marked every year on August 24 as Ukraine’s official Independence Day, the referendum paved the legal pathway towards the formal dissolution of the USSR.

The late 1991 referendum was also crucial in securing recognition of Ukrainian independence from the international community. Many of the first countries to recognize an independent Ukraine including Canada, Poland, and the United States would go on to become the country’s closest allies, standing shoulder to shoulder over the coming decades as Ukrainians struggled to achieve their aspirations for peace, personal freedoms, and human dignity.

In order to secure these goals, Ukrainians have sought to join the key institutions of the democratic world. Since early 2019, the country’s NATO and European Union membership aspirations have been enshrined in the Ukrainian Constitution.

Ukraine’s progress since 1991 has been anything but straightforward, but the country has emerged from years of domestic political turbulence as a vibrant and highly competitive democracy. This makes Ukraine a source of inspiration for the wider post-Soviet region. At the same time, Ukraine’s democratic progress means it is seen in Moscow as an existential threat to Russia’s own authoritarian model.

The current Russian military build-up along the Ukrainian border has attracted considerable international attention. As political leaders and analysts speculate over the likelihood of an invasion, it is vital to underline that Russia has already invaded Ukraine and is waging a war against Ukrainian statehood that is currently in its eighth year.

Putin has made it clear he does not accept Ukraine’s independence. His recent essay “On the Historical Unity of Russians and Ukrainians” and his frequent claims that Russians and Ukrainians are “one people” reflect the Kremlin ruler’s denial of Ukraine’s very existence as a distinct and separate nation. This rhetoric directly echoes the language of the Czarist era and exposes the imperial ambitions driving Putin’s war against Ukraine.

The democratic world now has an opportunity to demonstrate to Russia that the rules-based international order will prevail by adopting a decisive response to the Kremlin campaign against Ukraine.

It is no secret that the only language Russia respects is the language of strength. Unfortunately, Western efforts to continue doing business with Russia since 2014 have served to encourage further bad behavior. In geopolitics as in the school playground, the only way to deal with bullies is to stand up to them. 

There are a number of options available to the West that would send an unambiguous message to Moscow. Freezing the certification of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline would be a strong signal. It is also important to upgrade military cooperation with Ukraine, including the provision of defensive weapons. 

Ideally, Western leaders would demonstrate their rejection of Russia’s imperial ambitions by moving forward with NATO membership action plans for Ukraine and Georgia. Allowing Moscow an unofficial veto on future NATO membership rewards the Kremlin and is the surest way to guarantee continued Russian policies of international aggression.

Thirty years ago, an overwhelming majority of Ukrainians voted for independence. Tragically, they are now dying in defense of this independence in a war waged by a revisionist and resurgent Russia.

With the Russian military currently massed along the Ukrainian border, the Kremlin is threatening to launch a major escalation in its campaign to extinguish Ukrainian independence. Putin has already plunged the world into a new Cold War in his quest to subjugate Ukraine. He will continue to advance his imperial agenda until confronted decisively.

At stake are the values that will define international relations for decades to come. The West needs bold and visionary leadership to end this war on democracy and a rules-based international order. The alternative is a new age of empires where great powers are free to impose themselves on weaker neighbors. Putin wants to resurrect the Soviet Empire and reverse the verdict of 1991. We cannot allow him to succeed.

Paul Grod is President of the Ukrainian World Congress.

5 comments

  1. A commenter named Anthony Pilolli in today’s DT said:

    “Wasn’t it Russia who first massed tens of thousands of troops, especially in a volatile region, along its western border because Nato or other European forces certainly had not. But yet Putin has the gall to state that’s it’s due to the West, Nato and its provocations. Does he think we’re all idiots or something?
    Remember it’s really argumentative the Russians blew that Malaysian airliner out of the sky. Especially when the missile unit was seen on camera driving back into Russia.
    It’s the Ukrainians who should decide their future not Russia or Putin. It’s safe to say a great majority look westward rather than eastward. Putin should also realise too that Russia isn’t the great empire he thinks it is.”

    Yes he does think we are all idiots, because we are. Or at least our leaders are.
    In 1856, the Russian empire was steadily expanding into Europe. An alliance of France, Britain and Turkey put a stop to that and took Crimea; thus neutralising Russia’s Black Sea dominance. The treaty that ended the war resulted in Russian humiliation.
    Instead of kicking them while they were down, we allowed them to re-arm and rebuild.
    Same thing happened in 1991, when 93% of Ukrainians, including those in Donbas and Crimea, clearly demonstrated that they wanted out of the evil empire. Russia was once again neutralised; they even had a president who, although hopelessly corrupt like all Russian rulers, was not ill-disposed to the west. That all changed when putler seized power, expedited the apartment bombings and unleashed a savage war against Grozny. The rodent has been constantly at war since then and has even been allowed to get away with what all Russians do: thieve land.
    Russia is itself an empire, not a country and it must be crushed. The next time its economy hits the skids, it must be completely dismantled. We just need to wait until someone like Ron Reagan comes along; ie one who knows an evil empire when he sees one and knows what to do about it.

    Liked by 2 people

    • And shortly after that the Moskali tried to take Japan and got slapped down again. Then tried to take Finland and got slapped down again. Their desire for power and territory will not end and you’re right, we should have finished the job and destroyed their imperialistic ideology. When in history did the Moskali ever win a war without help? I can’t think of a time.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Maybe Putler should ask Ukrainians about that. He wouldn’t like the answer I suspect. I would like Zelensky to conduct a referendum in Ukraine. Just 2 options on it, based on the Crimean referendum often quoted by Putler.

      Option 1. Do you want to live under the Russian jackboot. ie pre 1991?
      Option 2. Do you want the right to freedom and democracy by closer association with the West?

      Liked by 2 people

      • I imagine the usual 12-15% might go for option 1. But actually it might even be less than that and reflect the 1991 verdict precisely.
        It’s an idea that might counter the bullshit of the western based kremtrolls, as well as nazi scum like Kisylev, Zhirinovsky etc.

        Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.