How Russia “overcame” Crimea’s water blockade

Spoiler alert: it didn’t.

Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu claims that Russia has set up a 32-kilometer temporary water pipeline in the occupied Crimea, which he says helped lift the “water blockade” of the peninsula before the trunk water pipeline construction is completed.

The statement can be viewed as a post-truth policy and propaganda message that doesn’t correspond to the logic of common sense. Anyone capable of critical thinking who is at least a little familiar with the geography of Crimea will have serious doubts.

If we look at the length of the peninsula from north to south, from west to east, or at the distance between neighboring regional centers, it will obviously be more than 32 kilometers. How can such a short water pipe route remove the problem of “water blockade”? The pipe could only facilitate supply in a particular area. But strategically, this does not enhance fresh water security of the Crimean Peninsula.

Shoigu does not specify exactly where the water supply route was laid and from which source fresh water is being taken. We can assume that this is about the rerouting of some of the mountain rivers, pumping water out of some reservoir or extracting it from an artesian well. While I see these three sources.

Recently, occupation authorities have taken measures aimed at alleviating the water shortage on the peninsula. However, these are no long-term steps and they don’t fundamentally resolve the issue of water supply shortage. They can only mitigate the problem, while, at the same time, bringing long-term implications for the environment.

For example, due to the diversion of riverbeds, there comes an impending change in the ecosystem of a particular area, which poses a threat to the existence of certain species of fish and other species. Reservoirs in Crimea are also gradually drying out as occupation authorities keep pumping out more water than comes in from natural sources.

It is also harmful to supply water from artesian wells because Crimea has peculiar geology: the more fresh groundwater is pumped out, the more salty water gets into the soil. Due to soil salinization, lands become unsuitable for vegetation.

Therefore, Shoigu’s statement is a manipulation ridden with propaganda clichés. It aims to convince the Crimean and Russian population that the peninsula can do without water from the North Crimea Canal.

Yevhen Yaroshenko is an analyst with the CrimeaЅOЅ initiative

(c) Unian

2 comments

  • Crimea has an area of 27,000 sq km. Shoigu’s fantasy pipeline would be a mere trickle. If it was supplying so much water as to lift a blockade, where are images of a massive pipeline with water gushing out of it? As usual with the pathological liars in the Kremlin, we can take it all as BS.

    Liked by 2 people

    • The mini Mongol is just trying to show his boss that he is doing something. The propaganda is just for domestic use. Like the writer says, anyone that can think critically would know its just propaganda for the sheep so they don’t occupy Red Square.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.