To Halt Russian Misbehavior, Seize Assets

Alan Riley

The Russian governing elite has largely fireproofed themselves against Western sanctions. Asset targeting, on the other hand, fills them with fear.

In April, the State Department imposed a further round of sanctions on Russia over the SolarWinds hack. Given the audacity and enormous scale of this event, the U.S. sanctioned not only Russian technology firms working with the Russian intelligence services but also restricted access to the sovereign debt market. These sanctions will hurt, as will most of the other sanctions imposed since the invasion of Ukraine in 2014.

However, they won’t hurt enough to change the behavior of Vladimir Putin’s regime. The new measures are ultimately tolerable, at least for the Kremlin and associated elites. So, what would be intolerable? The answer is a move by the US and its allies to block the acquisition of assets by Russian actors in the West and freezing those already held there. Such a focus would inflict direct costs at the highest level of the Russian regime.

It is not true to say that U.S. sanctions have had no effect on the Russian economy since they were first imposed at scale after the invasion of eastern parts of Ukraine and the annexation of Crimea in 2014. U.S. sanctions triggered a financial crisis amongst Russian companies, significantly reduced levels of foreign direct investment, and limited access to vital technologies for the defense and energy sectors. They also reduced opportunities for the diversification of the Russian economy, making it further reliant on its energy and commodities sectors.

But for the Kremlin and its associates, such sanctions are insufficiently severe to change behavior. It has already anticipated such steps and prepared. Firstly, even with reduced resources, the Russian state can deploy disinformation and cyber strategies to project influence and disrupt third states. Secondly, and more fundamentally, over the last two decades, President Putin has built a political-economic model which allows the Russian Federation to tolerate, albeit at some significant cost, a high level of sanctions.

This model focuses on maintaining low levels of public expenditure. Despite Russia having a $1.7trn economy, the state budget is only $290bn. Hence the state can balance its books even if the oil price falls as low as $40 a barrel (the benchmark Brent crude it is currently about $66 a barrel). In addition, public debt levels are very low, at 18% of GDP, and a financial cushion is maintained with the National Wealth Fund which currently stands at $180bn. This “Putin Business Model” is designed to withstand the incoming economic damage that flows from bad behavior, albeit at the price of a worse life for ordinary Russians.

A major part of the Kremlin’s disinformation messaging focuses on denouncing the West as corrupt, hypocritical, and declining, in contrast to the higher civilizational values of Mother Russia. Beneath the rhetoric, the Kremlin and its friends have taken — in reality often stolen — the huge trade surpluses from oil, gas, and commodities revenues during two decades of plunder and moved them abroad.

A small group of Russian insiders owns very substantial amounts of offshore wealth, estimated to range from $800bn to $1.3trn. As Anders Åslund has pointed out, a large part is directly controlled by Kremlin and its allies, while many other members of the elite can also be directed to use part of their offshore wealth in the Kremlin’s interests.

The reasons for such a huge transfer of capital into the West are clear. Russia is not a rule of law state. Today’s billionaire may tomorrow inhabit a small cell in the Lubyanka, the opulent manor house outside Moscow, the reams of stock in Russian companies, and the piles of cash in the bank just a fading memory. Everyone, up to and including the President, wants to keep their capital safe. In addition, huge capital flows into the West provide a means to subvert Western institutions and Western actors, reducing the threat of Western action against Russia.

Erecting barriers to Russian capital movements and unearthing assets already in the West directly impacts elites in a way that sanctions do not. The escape route to a comfortable life in the West would be closed, as would be access to “their” assets. Furthermore, the elites would be faced with the harrowing dilemma of what to do with their more recently acquired ill-gotten gains.

This is the point often overlooked in dealing with large-scale tainted capital flows. The West is a rule of law market for large-scale capital flows, and it is a monopoly provider. Nowhere else in the world allows safe transfers, nowhere else provides a robust rule of law and sufficient economic activity at scale to absorb hundreds of billions of dollars, and ensure that that capital remains accessible.

For the Biden Administration, the first part of this assets strategy should be to block foreign capital flows from unknown capital sources entering the U.S., for instance, via private investment funds and real estate. Next, boost the enforcement resources of key agencies and departments such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN.) And then take this campaign internationally to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), representing most Western democratic states, with the aim of sealing off the rest of the West.

The other major limb of this strategy would be to unearth Russian assets across the West, starting in the U.S. Most assets are ultimately the stolen capital of the Russian people. The U.S. and its allies should have no compunction in identifying these and holding them in trust for the Russian people. This would also remove the prospect that they can be used for influence and subversion operations. Furthermore, the prospect of Western states holding trust funds for the Russian people, potentially for example distributing grants to Russian students, would undermine much of the Kremlin’s messaging.

Such an asset strategy would be far more intolerable to the Kremlin and its connected elites than sanctions. It is more likely to have an impact on Russian state behavior than all the sanctions imposed on Russian since 2014.

(c) CEPA


  • Finally someone has the right idea. We have been saying for years, the only way to stop Putin, is by going for the money. Apart from asset freezes, toss all the politicians in the West that have benefitted from these bribes to a nice long prison sentence. London alone could destroy the Russian economy, and Putin’s cronies. Seize all assets, strip all these fucking Russians of knighthoods, and UK passports, then send them back to Russia.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Of course all the offshore assets of putler and his cronies must be frozen, or bettter still, seized. But before raiding Switzerland, UAE, Mauritius, the Caymans, Singapore, Belize, we should be starting with London, Florida, New York and of course Germany, which holds $billions of putinazi criminals’ cash.
      A for Britain, putler right hand man Abramovich needs to be hit. Plus that new (to me) putinoid billionaire in London that you found recently. Unfortunately I forgot his name. I seem to remember he was in the entertainment business?

      Liked by 2 people

      • I forgot his name too. He seems to donate more money to US political causes. He donates to both the Dems and the GOP, which might not be illegal, it certainly should be.

        Liked by 2 people

        • I need to find him again and have another look. There are a shitload of Russian billionaires and millionaires having a beautiful life in London, eating in the best restaurants and having memberships of the best clubs. My guess would be that the overwhelming majority of them are putlerite skanks, with the exception of Mikhail Khodorkovsky, who is one of the few (only?) oligarchs left alive who crossed the tiny poisoner.
          There needs to be a coordinated action in London and America to take these pigs down.

          Liked by 1 person

          • A Google search for Ukrainian billionaire. Richest man in the UK should find him.

            Liked by 2 people

            • I found him. Sir Leonard Blavatnik I was looking for Russian billionaires, not Ukrainian. But when you reach his wiki page you realise he is only notionally Ukrainian. In fact wiki describes him thus: “an American-British-Russian businessman, investor, and philanthropist. He made his fortune through business via diversified investments in myriad companies through his conglomerate company, Access Industries.”
              Donations : “in 2011, Blavatnik donated to both President Barack Obama and his GOP rival, former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney.
              Blavatnik, who is closely associated with Vladimir Putin, is one of the largest donors to the US Republican Party, and in 2015–2016 donated a total of $7.35 million to six Republican political candidates, including South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham, Florida Senator Marco Rubio and Arizona Senator John McCain. In February 2016, Blavatnik donated over $1 million to an anti-Donald Trump GOP group. He also donated $1 million to the committee for the inauguration of Donald Trump. In August 2017, political scientist Bo Rothstein resigned from the Blavatnik School of Government out of opposition to Blavatnik’s politics.”
              He obviously attempted to buy influence everywhere in order to cover all the angles.
              He anglicised his name to “Leonard”, or ‘Len’ to his mates. He’s a despicable bastard and undoubtedly an enemy of Ukraine.
              It is an utter disgrace that a pig like this has been allowed to buy himself into British high society.
              Notice the word ‘vatnik’ is hidden in his name. Highly appropriate.

              Liked by 2 people

      • If possible I think I’d go one step further and send a message to Hitler 2.0 that a huge amount of the frozen assets will go to the victims of his regime, namely Georgia and Ukraine. That would send his head spinning.

        Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.