Kremlin: Crimean referendum did not violate Ukrainian Constitution

Any referendums on self-determination of Russian regions are prohibited by Russian law, but the “referendum” in Crimea in 2014 did not contradict Ukrainian and international laws, said Russian presidential spokesman Dmitry Peskov.

“This “referendum” was legitimate in essence, from the point of view of international law and in terms of the laws of Ukraine,” Peskov said, as quoted by TASS.

According to him, the referendum was allowed, as Crimea, as part of Ukraine, has a special status, including “all legislative and other initiatives of Crimean lawmakers.”

At the same time, in response to the remark that the Ukrainian Constitution does not allow regional referendums without consent of the central authorities, Peskov replied that “it is not prohibited.”

At the same time, Peskov ruled out even the slightest possibility of holding referendums on self-determination of the Russian regions.

“This (referendum) would be a violation of the Basic Law of the Russian Federation. Since we cannot and should not talk about violation of the Basic Law of the Russian Federation, we do not discuss such a possibility,” he said.

Peskov was also asked why the names of the so-called “little green men”, who facilitated the “referendum” after the invasion of Crimea, have not yet been disclosed. The representative of the Kremlin explained that “these are people, the vast majority of whom continue to work, to fulfill their duties now. Many of these people work in sensitive areas, so it is normal that their names are not made public.”

In February 2014, armed people in uniforms without insignias appeared in Crimea and captured the Supreme Council of Crimea, the Simferopol Airport, the Kerch ferry crossing and other strategic objects, and prevented the Ukrainian army from taking action. Initially, the Russian government refused to acknowledge that these armed people were Russian soldiers, but President Vladimir Putin later admitted it.

On 16 March 2014, a referendum on the status of Crimea was held in Crimea and Sevastopol, in which the inhabitants supposedly voted for the peninsula to become part of Russia. The outcome of the so-called referendum is not recognized by Ukraine, the EU or the US. On 18 March, Putin announced the “annexation” of Crimea to Russia.

International organizations have declared the annexation illegal and condemned Russia’s actions. Western countries have imposed economic sanctions on Russia in connection with the annexation. Russia claims to have “restored historical justice”. Ukraine’s parliament, the Verkhovna Rada, declared 20 February 2014 the start of Russia’s temporary occupation of Crimea and Sevastopol.

https://www.uawire.org/kremlin-crimean-referendum-did-not-violate-ukrainian-constitution

(C)UAWIRE 2021

5 comments

  • It sadly did. The invasion prior to the referendum made it void. The referendum, or some kinda Maidan, should have happened before Crimea got invaded. Although i personally consider the Crimea lost for Ukraine, i would never hide the fact that it was brute theft by an anxious Moscow regime.

    Liked by 3 people

  • “This “referendum” was legitimate in essence, from the point of view of international law and in terms of the laws of Ukraine,” Peskov said”

    Well Peskov, let me show you the Ukrainian laws on referendum, then tell me were Muscovy adhered to Ukrainian laws.

    Article 5. National referendum on the territorial changes of Ukraine

    1. An all-Ukrainian referendum on changing the territory of Ukraine is a way for citizens to approve/disapprove a draft law on international agreement ratification on changing the territory of Ukraine. The president is to conclude an international agreement ratification, and then to submit this document to review at the Verkhovna Rada.

    2. The Verkhovna Rada is to declare an all-Ukrainian referendum on the territorial changes of Ukraine.

    Liked by 4 people

  • onlyfactsplease

    Pest-cough doesn’t know the laws of mafia land let alone those of Ukraine. He’s probably too stupid to even tie his shoes without help. He certainly looks that stupid.

    Liked by 3 people

  • You may not have heard that Putin has recalled his Ambassador to the US for “consultations.” Seems the runt is tired of having the truth told about him.

    Personally, I would have reduced relations to the consular level when Putin invaded Ukraine.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.