Stoltenberg: It’s not for Russia to decide who should join NATO

Russia has no right to intervene in the sovereign decisions of democracies, in particular Ukraine and Georgia, on joining NATO.

“I’ve heard that question phrased in different ways many times – as if, in a way, the enlargement of NATO has been some kind of aggressive action against Russia; has justified Russia’s use of force against other countries, like you mentioned, Donbas and Georgia and so on. I think we have to start with the basics. The basics is that all countries in Europe have signed the Helsinki Final Act – and also many other documents – which clearly states that all nations have the sovereign right of choosing their own path. It’s so obvious that sovereign nations should have and must have the right to decide their own path, including what kind of security arrangements they want to be part of, or not want to be part of,” NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said at the Sciences PO Youth & Leaders Summit, answering a question whether NATO enlargement fuels Russian aggression against neighbouring countries.

He recalled that gaining NATO membership was once a sovereign decision of Eastern European countries, including the three Baltic states which were once part of the USSR. At the same time, NATO has never forced anyone to join. These countries themselves chose the path of joining the Alliance through the democratic procedures.

“We will never force a country to join. So, when our good friends and neighbours, Finland or Sweden have, for decades, decided they don’t want to be members of NATO, we totally respect that. But when countries like Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, Poland and many others, Romania, decide that they want to be members, of course, if they meet the NATO standards, they should be allowed to be members,” NATO Secretary General said.

He stressed that the issue of whether a country should join NATO or not should be decided only by the country and the Allies. Russia has no right to try to intervene or to block or to stop the membership of a sovereign nation into NATO.

“Georgia wants to become a member of NATO. And that’s not for Russia to stop. Whether Georgia becomes a member of NATO or not is for Georgia and NATO Allies to decide, and only them… It’s not for Russia to decide what Georgia is to do… And, therefore, what they [Russia] have done in Abkhazia, in South Ossetia, violating their territorial integrity, the sovereignty of Georgia, an independent country, is unacceptable. The same with Ukraine, of course, illegal annexation of Crimea, destabilising Donbas, eastern Ukraine. It’s violating absolute fundamental principles in the way we should create a peaceful, stable world,” Stoltenberg stressed.

He added that NATO’s role is to provide support to Ukraine and Georgia in capacity-building and reforms.

“We have presence in different ways [of cooperation] in both Georgia and Ukraine. But, of course, we need to find political solutions. Different conflicts, Moldova, Nagorno Karabakh, different conflicts, but the main message is that we should respect the sovereignty. And, of course, we should also look for political solutions. And NATO supports the different efforts to find political negotiated solutions to the different conflicts, more or less frozen,” NATO Secretary General said.

(c) Ukrinform


  • Nothing to stop NATO from admitting Ukraine and Georgia. Ukraine is ranked 25th on the global firepower list of countries. They are ranked far above other NATO countries, so why have they not been invited? Your words are hollow Stoltenberg.

    NATO countries ranked below Ukraine in the global firepower index.
    Greece – 29
    Norway – 33
    Czechia – 34
    Netherlands – 37
    Romania – 41
    Portugal – 52
    Denmark – 54
    Hungary – 55
    Slovakia – 58
    Croatia – 63
    Bulgaria – 67
    Belgium – 68
    Lithuania – 85
    Slovenia – 88
    Latvia – 97
    Estonia – 109
    Albania – 113
    Montenegro – 123
    North Macedonia – 133

    The upshot of this, Ukraine would strengthen NATO greatly. They are ranked higher than 19/30 NATO members, and they have experience in killing vermin.

    Liked by 4 people

    • Greece has quite a formidable armed forces because of its proximity and long standing antipathy to Turkey. However, unfortunately, it is another Russian lackey and could never be trusted.

      Liked by 2 people

  • This Marxist sack of shit will never admit the truth : he and Russia’s many lackeys within Nato will never allow Georgia and Ukraine to join unless Russia withdraws completely from those nations. And Russia will never withdraw unless pushed out by financial or military force.
    Nato has hardly any countries that actually would fight Russia and is therefore not fit for purpose. The frogs, krauts and many others would surrender rather than fight. They would expect the US, UK and Can to do the hard work as usual.
    Time for Britain, Poland, Pribaltika, the US and Canada to withdraw completely and leave the rest of those tossers to do what they want, which is to form an EU army. We could then have a trade/military/intel sharing bloc consisting of the Five Eyes, Ukraine, Poland, Pribaltika, Moldova, Georgia, Japan, South Korea, Chile and Portugal, plus other like-minded states. The qualification being that they must be prepared to fight Russia on all fronts : political, trade and military.

    Liked by 3 people

    • In my opinion I would not like to see the breakup of NATO but rather a change of the rules. Each State should be allowed to send troops or not to send troops but the rules should change from a unanimous vote to a super majority when deciding military intervention. This would also fix that Kraut/Frog issue you mention.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Redders, they made it clear that they want an EU army under EU command. That would make Nato obsolete anyway. Let them have it. I certainly would not want British servicemen fighting in EU-instigated wars, so I’m glad we’re out of it. Nato can only be fit for purpose if its key members will fight Russia. And we know damn well most of them won’t.

        Liked by 2 people

  • Breaking news! Gazprom suspends the construction of nordstream 2 till a better political time

    Liked by 3 people

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.