SBI Launches Investigation Against Constitutional Court Head Tupytskyi On Suspicion Of High Treason

image

   
The State Bureau of Investigation (SBI) has launched an investigation against the Constitutional Court’s Chief Justice Oleksandr Tupytskyi on suspicion of high treason and unauthorized occupation of a land plot.

The press service of the State Bureau of Investigation announced this in a statement, the Ukrainian News Agency reports.

“Investigators at the State Bureau of Investigation have launched a pre-trial investigation on suspicion of unauthorized occupation of a land plot by a group of people and high treason by the chairperson of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine,” the State Bureau of Investigation’s acting Director Oleksii Sukhachev said.

According to preliminary information, Tupytskyi is suspected of occupying a land plot that was not allocated to him in accordance with the procedure established by Ukrainian legislation in July 2018 and concluding a deal that recognized the authority of Russian officials register the alienation of the Ukrainian land plot and categorize it as land that falls under the jurisdiction of the Russian Federation.

According to the statement, Tupytskyi thus committed an act that harmed Ukraine’s sovereignty, territorial integrity, national security, and economic security (Section 2 of Article 197-1 and Section 1 of Article 111 of the Criminal Code).

He faces imprisonment for 12-15 years with or without confiscation of property if found guilty.

As Ukrainian News Agency earlier reported, Tupytskyi has denied concealing information about ownership of a land plot in Crimea and said that Russia has opened a case against him.

© 2020 UNA

5 comments

  • The SBI is just banned by the same judge. What kind of loony farm is and always will be Ukraine!

    Liked by 3 people

  • “According to preliminary information, Tupytskyi is suspected of occupying a land plot that was not allocated to him in accordance with the procedure established by Ukrainian legislation in July 2018 and concluding a deal that recognized the authority of Russian officials register the alienation of the Ukrainian land plot and categorize it as land that falls under the jurisdiction of the Russian Federation.”
    Now, this would make sense why those pieces of shit judges decided to rescind Article 366-1.

    Liked by 3 people

    • It begs the question of how a constitutional judge can have such a conflict of interest AND then not even declare it? He deserves 12 years and the forfeit of everything he has. Plus a tattoo of Putler’s ass on his forehead.

      Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.