U.S. gives Russia ultimatum during nuclear missiles talks

The global nuclear-weapon control system established in the last years of the Cold War is moving steadily towards collapse.

The U.S. de facto gave the Russian side an ultimatum in negotiations on the fate of the Strategic Offensive Reductions Treaty (START-3), the last existing agreement limiting the number of nuclear warheads on both sides.

The treaty signed in 2010 by Barack Obama and Dmitry Medvedev expires in February 2021.

Washington is proposing that Russia, as soon as possible, before the November U.S. elections, sign a presidential memorandum, which will enshrine the basic terms for the extension of the treaty, the White House Special Presidential Envoy for Arms Control, Marshall Billingslea told the Russian newspaper Kommersant.

If that doesn’t happen, “after Trump is re-elected, the “entry fee,” as we say in the U.S., will go up,” he warned.

If no extension agreement is reached, “we are quite happy to continue the modernization of nuclear forces without restrictions,” Billingslea said.

The U.S. insists that the updated START treaty should include China, which, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, is building its arsenal at a record speed among all nuclear powers.

By the end of 2019, the number of nuclear warheads available to China increased by 30 and reached 320. As a result, China for the first time in its history rose to the third place among the countries of the world in this indicator, overtaking France. The latter had a 10-year reduction in the number of warheads, amounting to 290.

The U.S. reduced its nuclear arsenal by 385 warheads, to 5,800, and Russia by 125, to 6,375.

According to SIPRI, Moscow remains the leader in the number of available strategic warheads, but lags behind the United States, if only warheads in operational readiness are considered – 1570 vs. 1750.

Russia, in turn, demands that the treaty be joined by American allies – France and Britain, and the U.S. nuclear weapons would be removed from Europe.

Washington rejects these terms. “Neither Great Britain nor France is increasing their nuclear arsenals. China is actively developing and deploying its nuclear weapons,” Billingslea explained.

He added that the U.S. nuclear forces will remain in Europe, just like the Russian missiles. The U.S. does not demand the withdrawal of warheads and missile systems from Kaliningrad.

Russia considers the American demands an “ultimatum” and the Kremlin does not intend to carry out discussions in this manner, Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov told TASS.

“These are all ultimatums that reduce the possibility of any agreement,” he said, adding that Russia “take care of its own security in the best possible way, including with the development of strategic deterrence forces.”

“In a number of areas, our developments and our achievements in the military sphere are superior to the American ones, as was also mentioned,” Ryabkov said.

(c) UAWire

4 comments

  • “In a number of areas, our developments and our achievements in the military sphere are superior to the American ones, as was also mentioned,” Ryabkov said.

    Bombing hospitals, and poisoning people with banned chemical weapons does not count.

    Liked by 5 people

    • The tiny bluffer HATES the language of ultimatums because that is the only way to speak to him. No doubt he threw a tantrum and probably even chased his little slave boys out of the room beforehand so he wouldn’t harm them.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Yes. An ultimatum is always good, when rigorously applied. However, history tells us that tyrants that unleash violence ultimately are only stopped by more violence. Either by their own people tiring of tyrannical rule or an outside response.
        The best option is a colour revolution, such as the Czechs, which succeeded. Georgia and Ukraine succeeded, only to be rolled back by putler’s savagery, which of course was met by a very pathetic response from the west.
        The Armenians had one too; but it appears that they simply wanted one putinoid scum to be replaced by another. Which looks like what is likely to happen in Belarus.
        The Czechs and the other Central Europe states got their freedom because of the military and political security of Nato and EU membership, which was pitilessly denied to Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia.

        Liked by 2 people

  • The mafiosi should strongly consider agreeing with the US. We can afford the modernization of our nuclear armament, the mafiosi can’t.

    Liked by 3 people

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.