There will be no Hollywood ending in Belarus drama

Liam Halligan
By Liam Halligan 15 August 2020

“Stand up if you voted for Tikhanovskaya!” The call came from a man in overalls at the back of the hall. Dozens of his fellow workers, the vast majority of those in the room, sprang to their feet, shouting down factory bosses trying to convince them to “go back to work, the election is over”.

These events happened at the Khimvolokno chemical plant in Grodno, a city in western Belarus, last Wednesday. Similar worker-manager meetings have been held at state-owned factories all week, since polling day last Sunday.

Most of the main factories in this country of 10 million, wedged between Poland and Russia and roughly the size of the UK, are now on strike. The Belarussian economy just stopped – which is why this could be the end for “Europe’s last dictator”.

Alexander Lukashenko rose to power in July 1994 – the last time Belarus held an election widely viewed as fair. Back then, he was a collective farm manager, who unexpectedly beat a pillar of the former communist establishment.

As a young journalist living at the time in Moscow, I well remember the Western commentariat raising hopes that Lukashenko – a charismatic outsider, not yet 40 ­– would drive reform in this former Soviet Republic, encouraging closer ties with the West.

Two years later, he dissolved an awkward Parliament – and has since become steadily more authoritarian. While each of the subsequent five Presidential elections have resulted in “landslide” backing, Lukashenko’s support, in reality, has been slipping.

But the response to last weekend’s poll was different. The President’s declared vote share of 80pc was so preposterous, so contrary to on-the-ground sentiment, that the public’s patience snapped. Fuelled by resentment and buoyed by social media, many younger citizens – particularly in the capital Minsk – began to protest.

The crackdown was severe, security forces unleashing tear gas and rubber bullets, throwing countless protesters in jail. That, in turn, outraged older voters, not least the blue-collar factory workers who keep Belarus going and, until now, broadly backed the status quo. For years, this wily despot has burnished his “man of the people” credentials, often filmed with miners and farmworkers. Now he stands isolated, barely clinging to power.

Belarus took a unique path after the Soviet Union collapsed in the early Nineties. As Russia and Ukraine dismantled their collectivised economies – enacting rapid privatisation – Lukashenko offered something different. Soviet-style production would continue, he said, with most factories remaining state-owned. As a result, Belarus would be relatively poor but stable, avoiding the post-Communist oligarchs and gangsterism of its larger neighbours. This model has just about worked. That’s because the Belarussian economy is not a joke and has continued to generate bearable living standards for most.

This was the part of the Soviet Union, after all, which produced most of the complex electronics and other components that drove the USSR’s military machine ­– and much of the workforce remains highly skilled.

The Minsk Automobile Works, for instance, has continued to churn out the hardy MAZ trucks used throughout the post-Communist world. Keramin is among Europe’s largest producers of ceramic tiles. And the iconic Minsk Tractor Works produces not just basic models but also highly sophisticated agricultural vehicles – more than 90pc of which are exported via MTZ dealerships across the world, including North America. Despite initial reservations, Lukashenko has also allowed parts of the private sector to flourish.

The largest supermarket chain, Eurotorg, has almost a thousand stores and was, back in 2018, on course to list its shares in London. Belarus boasts a burgeoning tech sector – hardly surprising, given high levels of mathematical and scientific education. The president has encouraged this, offering tax breaks since 2005, then lifting visa restrictions. Minsk is now a recognised tech-hub – where geeks from the EU, Russia, India and China can easily meet.

This combination of Soviet-style blue-collar work, tech growth and modest state largesse is why the World Bank estimates just 0.8pc of Belarus citizens are in poverty – far less than across the US and EU, plus all other post-Communist states. GDP per capita is lower than in Russia, Lithuania and Estonia but has, until relatively recently, been enough to keep the population broadly on side.

Post-Soviet chic

Over the last 10 years, though, growth has stagnated, with the Belarus economy expanding just 1.7pc a year since 2009, compared to 7.5pc on average during the previous decade, as the world economy has slowed.

Luck of Lukashenko

Close observers have known for years, the “unique path” of Belarus has long relied on Russian beneficence. Moscow has, since the Soviet collapse, continued to bestow billions of dollars’ worth of de facto annual energy subsidies on Minsk, via cheap crude oil – which Belarus refines for both domestic use and re-export at world prices.

Russia has been gradually withdrawing such subsidies, with Belarus now paying 80pc of the market price for crude, up from 50pc five years ago. Incoming tax changes means Moscow will charge Minsk full price for Russian oil from 2025 ­– which, while Russian gas exports to Belarus will remain subsidised, could cripple the economy altogether.

An increasingly savvy population has grown tired of Lukashenko’s antics. His response to the Covid crisis ­– “Drink vodka and go to the sauna!” – left even his elderly, rural supporters perplexed. Belarus, though, isn’t Ukraine. There will almost certainly be no “Maidan” style revolution or yearning to “join the West”.

On first impression, this crisis does indeed seem like a Hollywood movie – with Svetlana Tikhanovskaya, a photogenic, English-speaking opposition leader, centre stage. Now exiled in Lithuania, this self-styled “stay at home Mum” only stood because the presidential candidacy of her husband – a campaigning, anti-corruption YouTube blogger – ended in his arrest.

Yet Tikhanovskaya bears little animosity towards Moscow. She remains, like much of the Belarussian population, broadly statist, suspicious of the West and extremely mindful of where her country’s bread is buttered.

That’s why, as the EU bumbles, and the US chides Lukashenko, the Kremlin is watching and waiting – its finger on the economic windpipe of its far smaller, helplessly dependent neighbour.


  • A commenter beneath the original Telegraph article made an interesting point. I hope the writer won’t mind:-
    “Alan Norris
    15 Aug 2020 8:11PM

    Belarus, Russian, and Canada control world potash prices and production volume. The leading buyers are China and India.
    Uralkaki, the leading Russian producer and BPC used to control the market until the top Belarus mine was partially flooded. The Belarus potash situation is the swing factor in global potash pricing. Russia isn’t going to lose control of that lightly.
    It’s said in Minsk that Russian paratroopers would be on the lawn of the Belarus Presidential Palace within an hour and Russian tanks would join them shortly after if Belarus steps out of line. Putin doesn’t like Lukashenko but he probably likes Tikhanovskaya even less.
    Belarus is an unruly satellite of Russia under Lukashenko the Kremlin would prefer to keep it that way”.

    Liked by 6 people

  • “That’s why, as the EU bumbles, and the US chides Lukashenko, the Kremlin is watching and waiting – its finger on the economic windpipe of its far smaller, helplessly dependent neighbour.”
    The kremlin jackboot has been on the throats of Moldova, Georgia and Ukraine for many years. The US and EU will continue to do fuck all of any significance; just as normal. Unlike Georgia and Ukraine, Belarus has shown little appetite for becoming a western liberal democracy.
    If Tikhanovskaya takes power, not a lot will change. It would be rather like Navalny taking over in Russia: not as terrible as putler, but otherwise pretty much business as usual.

    Liked by 5 people

    • “Yet Tikhanovskaya bears little animosity towards Moscow. She remains, like much of the Belarussian population, broadly statist, suspicious of the West and extremely mindful of where her country’s bread is buttered.”

      Yeah, she is on record as saying Crimea is Russian, so she is definitely no friend of Ukraine. These protests, no matter how the Belarus government paint them, are not about being anti-Russian or pro European, they are anti Lukashenko. If Putin invades with his usual disregard for human life, they could quickly become anti Russian.

      Liked by 4 people

  • Interesting article.
    When all is said and done, mafia land will once again have a choke-hold on one of its neighbors and the only answer the West has are sanctions on a few individuals in Belarus. And, even if the West increases sanctions against mafia land, it won’t change a thing. Mafia land cannot afford to let the Belorussian people have their way. This would only encourage the own people to get on the streets. The little sewer rat will come down even harder on them than Luka. Simply put, the West is much too feeble to prevent this or a similar bad scenario for the two peoples. Their hero seems to be more like Chamberlain rather than Churchill.

    Liked by 3 people

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.