Russia explains mass destruction of Pantsir air defense systems by Turkish drones in Syria and Libya

The mass destruction of the Russian-made Pantsir-S1 anti-aircraft missile and artillery systems in Syria and Libya can be explained by the existence of a so-called “dead crater” or “dead zone”, writes the newspaper of the Russian Defense Minister Krasnaya Zvezda (Red Star).

The newspaper states, referring to the official tactical and technical characteristics of the air defense system, that Pantsir has limitations with regards to its ability to detect targets “at low, medium and high altitudes, especially those flying at minimum altitude and maximum speed, or at the highest altitude and maximum speed.”

Nevertheless, the publication notes that, considering the speed and effective scattering area of Turkish-made Bayraktar TB2 reconnaissance drones, Pantsir can counter them.

In June, the newspaper wrote that the export version of Pantsir air defense system has only an optical control system and is “therefore ill-equipped to fight such targets as the Turkish Bayraktar TB2”.

In the same month, the Ukrainian publication Defense Express, citing its own sources, reported that in recent years, during the military conflicts in Syria and Libya, at least 23 Russian-made Pantsir-S1 systems were destroyed.

(c) UAWire

6 comments

  • Pantsir has limitations with regards to its ability to detect targets “at low, medium and high altitudes, especially those flying at minimum altitude and maximum speed, or at the highest altitude and maximum speed.”

    So which altitude is this junk effective at?

    Liked by 3 people

  • This junk probably only detects civilian aircraft…

    Liked by 4 people

  • onlyfactsplease

    “…at low, medium and high altitudes, especially those flying at minimum altitude and maximum speed, or at the highest altitude and maximum speed.”
    Hardy, har, har! That about covers the whole range of capabilities of modern-day aircraft.
    Oh, they could be effective against biplanes and blimps though.
    At any rate, no explanation would have been far better and not so funny.

    Liked by 3 people

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.