This article contains Kremlin BS from another American Putin lover.
In 1933, British journalist Gareth Jones risked life and limb in service to the truth, while in comparison, the journalists of today only care about access to power and towing the elites’ ideological line.
Mr. Jones, a new film by esteemed director Agnieszka Holland, tells the true story of Gareth Jones, a Welsh journalist who travels to the Soviet Union in 1933 and uncovers the Holodomor, Stalin’s genocidal famine of Ukrainians.
Sadly, Mr. Jones, which boasts a fantastic cast of James Norton, Vanessa Kirby and Peter Sarsgaard, is a terrific story wrapped in a bad, dramatically unfocused and meandering film.
But thankfully, despite its cinematic unworthiness, the movie still contains important insights very relevant to our current time.
What makes Mr. Jones noteworthy is that the film’s noble protagonist is, unlike our current corrupt press corps, a dogged journalist more loyal to truth than to ideology, and more interested in maintaining his integrity than gaining access to power and wealth.
The film opens with Jones fresh off his 1933 interview with Hitler that leaves him convinced that war is ultimately inevitable. This belief gets him ridiculed for being naïve and hysterical by the stodgy and comfortable old guard of the British press.
Jones then sets his sights on the Soviet Union and tries to figure out how Stalin has been able to pull off his economic boom while the rest of the world is mired in depression, so he goes to Moscow in search of answers.
Upon arrival, he finds not the worker’s paradise that fellow journalists, like the New York Times’ Pulitzer Prize winning reporter in Moscow, Walter Duranty, have been deceptively portraying to the world, but instead discovers firsthand the repressive and totalitarian nature of Stalin’s Soviet Union.
Jones then follows a lead and risks his life by sneaking off a train and going to Ukraine, where he is thrust into the horrors of the Holodomor, which are brutally and effectively depicted in the film.
When Jones exposes this calamity to the Western world, political expediency causes it to be met with either skepticism or indifference. Unlike other journalists of his, or our, age, Jones refuses to tell people in power what they want to hear, instead telling them the truth, and is essentially blackballed and exiled because of it.
No doubt the same would happen today to any reporter brave enough to go against the officially approved narrative.
Our current press corps is inhabited by truth-disdaining, sycophantic stenographers more akin to the villainous Walter Duranty, a propagandist for the cause who sold his journalistic soul in exchange for a decadent and depraved lifestyle, than the truth-seeking Gareth Jones.
It is ironic that journalists of yesteryear, like Duranty, were complicit in positive falsehoods about Stalin’s Soviet Union, while journalists of today are complicit in negative falsehoods about Russia.
The cavalcade of journalistic failures and fiascos directly or tangentially related to Russia in recent years include, but are not limited to, the distortion of truth about the Maidan uprising, the supposed Syrian chemical weapons attacks, the ridiculous Cuba microwave weapons story, and of course, Russiagate, the biggest journalistic fraud perpetrated upon the American public since the Iraq War. And just this week we have added to this cornucopia of corporate media crap the ‘Russians pay bounty to kill American soldiers in Afghanistan’ nonsense. All of these stories are vapid, thin, propagandistic gruel, devoid of any depth, insight or actual reporting.
One glimpse at the ever-growing list of recurring journalistic farces involving Russia and it becomes glaringly obvious that Operation Mockingbird, the Cold War CIA program that planted stories and journalists in newsrooms across the media, is alive and well in practice, if not in name.
It is readily apparent that just as Walter Duranty was getting his marching orders from the Kremlin, reporters of today get their marching orders from Langley.
Of course, the truth-averse, ideologically driven journalism of the corporate media isn’t restricted to just Russia stories, as evidenced by the slavish and slanted coverage of Black Lives Matter and other woke endeavors.
The thing that I find most grating about the reliably deceptive establishment media is their incessant complaining about Trump’s alleged war on the press.
These same news outlets were conspicuously silent when Obama prosecuted whistleblowers nine times, which is three times more than all of his predecessors combined.
There was also nary a word of dissention from the intrepid souls in the media when Obama’s Department of Justice and FBI spied on reporters and tried to coerce them to expose their sources.
The most glaring example of the ideological cancer in journalism is the cheering by the establishment media of the prosecution and persecution of Julian Assange, who has done more to inform the public of the truth than any corporate-controlled reporter at any news outlet in the world, and may very well die in prison for it.
The current crop of subservient sycophants play-acting as journalists in the corporate media are an utter disgrace to their profession, and they dishonor the staggering sacrifice that people like Gareth Jones made in service to truth.
Mr. Jones is not a great movie, but it does chronicle the great struggles of a noble man. If only we had many, many more like him today, maybe truth would be revered and the powerful held accountable.
Using a film about Holodomor to attack the US is pretty despicable by anyone’s standards, except Putin scum like this author. I notice he totally omits how the brave Mr Jones died, with 3 bullets planted in him from the NKVD. Like so many other journalists who expose the truth in Russia, they don’t live long. This author is on a par with Duranty, an evil piece of Putin excrement, as can be seen by the media sites he publishes articles on. RT, Investopedia, Zero Hedge, CounterPunch, Russia Insider.
“…reporters of today get their marching orders from Langley.”
“…to inform the public of the truth than any corporate-controlled reporter at any news outlet in the world,”
Which is it RTrolly? Today’s journalists work for Langley or the Corporations?
How could he even claim to be an authority on journalism when he works for the most refutable regime since Hitler?
The contradiction is astounding. Langley employs all the journalists, who then go out and attack Trump, who is basically their leader. LMAO
Another case study that points out the reliance of the Kremlin to have ignorant and confused readerships. After all, which could be worse? Working for a corporation in a free market of ideas or having all your work approved by government bureaucrats that tow the line on the preordained narrative?
Could you imagine the uproar in the US, if the media bosses had to report to the WH on a weekly basis, to be told what they could, or could not write about?
Uproar? You are being kind, Foccusser, the USA would be burnt to the ground.
What I do find amusing, these so called journalists attack the US on a daily basis, everything is bad in the US, Russia is a great country, but they never get the urge to move to the Russian paradise.
A masterclass in kremtrollery. These type of squalid maggots certainly know their market : disturbed, twisted sociopaths who think that the rodent is a great man and have probably purchased putler mail order brides in a hopeless attempt to supplement the kremtroll breeding programme. There is as usual a giant clump of bullshit with some bits of truth thrown in for maximum confusion. I would say that ‘influencers’ like Tommy Robinson are in the target audience for this slurry.,
He’s another to add to your list, but I can’t say I have ever heard of this scumbag, must be a new recruit.