A no-deal Brexit is now all but inevitable

The Spectator 30th May 2020

John Keiger

Coronavirus is obscuring much about the future of the EU – and Britain’s relationship with it. Not everyone is joining the dots, but business is. And this means the decision for a no-deal Brexit is being taken outside of the official negotiations.

Nissan unveiled its global restructuring this week after making a £5 billion net loss in the last financial year. It will close its Barcelona factory with a loss of 2,800 jobs while the Spanish government has said this was the end of Nissan’s manufacturing in Europe. And so it is if Europe means the EU. For Nissan also announced that the future of its UK plant in Sunderland was secure. Why is this significant? If we cast our minds back to a pre-Covid world, on 3 February the Financial Times carried a headline ‘Nissan drafts plan to double down on UK under hard Brexit’. According to the leak from two individuals involved in the discussions, in the event of a hard Brexit and UK-EU tariffs on car exports, the Japanese carmaker would concentrate on boosting its 4 per cent UK market share to 20 per cent.In reality, each Brexit negotiator is merely going through the motions

Meanwhile, the ailing French vehicle manufacturer Renault, in which the French state has a 15 per cent share-holding, has announced the closure of three plants in France and thousands of job losses. Renault, it should be remembered, is in a choppy alliance with Nissan that the Carlos Ghosn affair worsened. Given that Renault was about to receive €5 billion (£4.5 billion) of state funding as part of France’s coronavirus bail-out, the French government and president Macron were up in arms. Adding insult to injury, it has been suggested that restructuring could involve shifting production of the Nissan Micra from Renault France to Nissan Sunderland. Such an eventuality would have the additional blow of demonstrating in Macron’s eyes that Brexit could be a winner. Yet it seems that in the Nissan case and doubtless many more, despite the public protestations, business was embracing a no-deal Brexit

The EU has suspended its state aid and competition rules, opening the flood-gates to member-state bail-outs of national business champions. Air France will receive €7 billion (£6.3 billion) and Lufthansa €9 billion (£8.1 billion). This, of course, unfairly rigs the European airline market in favour of failing airlines to the detriment of their ‘frugal’ counterparts. It also blows a hole in the EU dogma and insistence on a ‘level-playing field’ in a Brexit trade deal, as Matthew Lynn recently pointed out on Coffee House. The EU is all too conscious of this and how it will take years to roll back state aid. The Commission is attempting to salvage some of its principles by insisting that in exchange Lufthansa must give up a few slots at some European airports, while Air France should comply with the European Green Deal by abandoning domestic routes with less than a two-and-a-half-hour journey time. This is merely the tip of the iceberg for European members state aid. Either the ‘level playing field’ mantra is dropped in what is left of the negotiations, or more likely June becomes the semi-official date for a no-deal Brexit.

The EU’s recently agreed €750 billion (£675 billion) coronavirus bail-out and debt mutualisation package is a further decision taken outside the official Brexit negotiations that consecrates a no-deal outcome. Even if the EU package is eventually trimmed back by the frugal northern states, the UK cannot risk acceding to an extension for fear of having to continue paying into the new and dramatically increased EU 2021-27 budget from 1 January. Furthermore, the Commission – habitually more punitive of the UK than the Council – will have its powers dramatically increased to cover tax-raising and oversight of national expenditure. So not only would the UK be liable for some eye-watering budgetary contributions but it would also be caught by new taxes that could inter alia hit the City of London, such as the long-mooted tax on European financial transactions. This makes Michel Barnier’s statement this week that the EU is open to a two-year extension risible.

Finally, back to the side-show of the official Brexit negotiations. After Britain’s chief negotiator’s broadside of a letter a few weeks ago on the need for the EU negotiators to get real, David Frost added a further nail to the negotiation’s coffin. On 27 May, he announced that a fishing deal with the EU would be ‘very difficult’. But in reality, each Brexit negotiator is merely going through the motions. The pointilliste dots of individual decisions made elsewhere clearly paint a no-deal Brexit picture.

John Keiger is a professor of French history and former Research Director of the Department of Politics and International Studies at the University of Cambridge


  1. The Speccie is usually behind a paywall, so this is unusual.
    No-deal is actually very good for new trade deals with the Five Eyes, plus the Commonwealth.

    • You and your five eyes. 😂 Anglia needs more. You eat bread? You need Ukraine. You drink coffee? You need Brazil. You use a phone or pc? You need Korea and Japan. You need cheap underwear or shirts? You need Vietnam. You eat quality beef? You need Uruguay? And if you need cheap hookers, you need Russia. 😂😂😂

      • The Five Eyes is the most successful intelligence sharing and military alliance in history. Unbeatable. I don’t know why you dislike it Mike. I am simply proposing that we add a massive free trade deal to the the first two elements of the alliance. All will benefit.
        Ukraine and Georgia are already being prepped up for a symbiotic trade relationship with us post EU. I fully expect all three parties to do very well out of it. Britain is already the second biggest investor in Georgia.
        I want SK and Japan to be included of course.
        Britain has piss poor relations in central and South America, except for Chile, Belize and maybe Mexico. The rest are commie shitholes.
        As for Brazil, who knows? They usually have really shit leftist regimes until lately. I don’t know enough about Bolsonaro yet, so I prefer to reserve judgement. So far it’s a bit mixed.
        I have some modest expectations of a slight improvement of trade and political ties with India. Modi doesn’t like the chicoms and is showing signs of maybe moving away from the traditionally close links with Russia. Possibly because the military stuff they buy off them always turns out to be total crap.

  2. It’s difficult to say if one probability will be better than the other. Only time will tell.
    However, not having to be a net-payer of the EU budget (second in the EU) and no more ball-and-chain rules to adhere to, could be quite beneficial for Britain.

What is your opinion?