Russia’s occupation of Crimea, Donbas war not “serious violations” in Council of Europe’s new sanctions procedure

Article by: Serhiy Sydorenko

Russia’s two-year battle to lift sanctions imposed by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe for its occupation of the Ukrainian peninsula of Crimea and war in Donbas and return to the Assembly as a full-fledged member finished triumphantly in June 2019. Then, PACE voted to destroy its existing sanctions mechanism. At the January 2020 PACE session, the Ukrainian delegation was unable to reinstate sanctions against Russia. Moreover, Russian Petr Tolstoi was chosen as PACE vice-president, and Ukraine’s amendments for the new sanctions mechanism were repealed. Serhiy Sydorenko, editor of the Ukrainian online media outlet European Pravda, explained whether PACE will now have any possibilities for punishing violators, and who will be affected by the new rules. Here is an adapted translation of his article.

On 5 February, the Council of Europe announced that it was finally ready to punish the worst offenders. The Committee of Ministers of the CoE, the governing body of the organization comprising the ambassadors of its 47 Member States, decided on a new procedure for responding “to serious violations by a member State of its statutory obligations.”

States seeking the “forgiveness” of Russia in Strasbourg have done everything to prevent the country’s aggression against Ukraine from being a reason for sanctions in PACE. In particular, Russia’s aggression in eastern Ukraine and the occupation of the Crimea are not “serious violations,” based on the wording of the document. Additionally, it is now unrealistic to punish Putin for his other actions, as the procedure gives Russia every opportunity to get away with violations.

The bills are paid

It’s worth noting that the news from Strasbourg did not come as a surprise.

On the contrary, this decision was expected, but this does not make it any less outrageous. By adopting it, the Council of Europe completed implementing the “reconciliation” agreements it reached with Russia last year. Without Ukraine’s participation in the process, and contrary to Ukraine’s position. European Pravda reported about these arrangements last summer.

Then PACE changed its own rules of procedure, amputated its own powers to impose sanctions, and agreed to return the Russian parliamentarians to the assembly without any sanctions if Moscow would only give up its threats to leave the Council of Europe. For their part, the Russians promised:

  • to resume payments to the organization’s budget (Russia did so on 4 September 2019);
  • to release some of the Ukrainian hostages, including the captive Ukrainian Navy POWs (this happened almost simultaneously – on 7 September 2019, with Russia managing to get the best bargain for itself);

Yet another condition remained to fulfill the agreement: the Council of Europe had to approve a new, complicated sanctioning procedure for the worst offenders, which would guarantee Moscow that it would not be subjected to sanctions.

Strasbourg completed this part of the work “with honor.” The preliminary approval of the new procedure was a major issue on the agenda of the January PACE session, where it was approved by an absolute majority. And this week, the Council of Europe’s main rulemaking body, the Committee of Ministers (CM), completed its part of the work, doing so in the most suitable (for the Russians) way.

At the same time, the Russians pulled off a special informational operation, which not only blocked the Ukrainian amendments to the decision, but also helped to create the myth that the Russians had nothing to do with that.

More details on this will come in a while; first, let’s look at the changes introduced by the decision of the CM.

No sanctions for Donbas

In the summer of 2019, when PACE amputated its own sanction powers, the initiators of this decision – primarily France and Germany – tried to save their faces (as media in their respective countries criticized it), saying that it was a temporary decision, and a new and even tougher sanctioning mechanism will be adopted as early as 2020.

Even then, many did not believe that the new procedure would give real possibilities to punish the Kremlin. However, some details of the new mechanism surpassed even the expectations of the skeptics.

The mechanism, as it is adopted, is very complicated.

The support of 130 PACE members from different delegations is required only to initiate it (collecting such a number of signatures on one piece of paper is difficult even logistically) or two-thirds of the votes of the member states in the CM. The approval of sanctions under this scheme is preceded by a lengthy process of dialogue with the offending State and by the exploration of ways to avoid imposing sanctions (according to the decision of the CM, the indicative timeframe of the procedure is 12 months). At every stage, the process can be continued, paused, or terminated if “positive progress” is achieved.

And, most importantly, as it is outlined in the CM decision, sanctions can be finally imposed only if “there has been no improvement of the situation.” Therefore, it is enough for the offending State to demonstrate some progress, without even resolving the situation, to sweet-talk everybody.

And that’s not all. Aggression against another state under this procedure is not considered a “serious violation.”

The violation of the article of the Statute of the Council of Europe stating that the organization is established on “peace based upon justice and international co-operation” cannot be a trigger to launch a new procedure – PACE received such an amendment from Ukraine, but it was struck down.

And that was not an accident.

Several of European Pravda’s interlocutors among PACE members and diplomats (both from Ukraine and friendly states) have explained that the CoE is considering… Azerbaijan, but not Russia as the likely “first victim” of the new procedure.

According to the CM decision, the procedure can only be initiated if the state ceases to “accept the principles of the rule of law and of the enjoyment by all persons within its jurisdiction of human rights and fundamental freedoms.” Namely, the state must, basically, refuse to abide by any of the fundamental freedoms and take no steps to remedy the violation. Strasbourg is convinced that Russia will not go for it.

Is it possible to punish Russia beyond the new rules? In theory, yes.

Both the decision of the CM and the statements of all Council of Europe officials emphasize that the new procedure is a complimentary one and that the old rapid-reaction mechanisms remain valid. You can even exclude a member state from the organization without initiating any procedures. But this is all in theory.

In practice, the Council of Europe has no political will to impose any sanctions on the Russian Federation again.

Moreover, even Ukraine’s friendly member states show a reluctance to fight.

Ukraine vs. everyone else

When the new sanction procedure was approved by PACE, it gained a strong majority in its support: 109 MPs voted in favor, 24 were against. Another 30 MPs abstained – a very high figure for the Assembly. And even more parliamentarians (including those from Ukraine’s friendly states) simply left the room or did not press any button.

That was the time the first alarms went on.

Last summer Ukraine, under the previous composition of the Parliament, created the Baltic+ group in PACE consisting of MPs from states which support Ukraine – from Poland, the Baltic states, Georgia, etc. But why did five Poles and three Georgians vote in favor of the sanctioning procedure that gets Russia out of trouble, and nobody from those states voted against? Why did all the Lithuanians abstain? And why did most MPs from the UK vote in favor? This is because Russia conducted a very effective information operation in PACE which Ukraine either did not identify on time or could not stop. The Russians did their best to show that they were against the new mechanism.

It was like turkeys voting for Christmas. But many Western politicians seemed to believe in that, or at least they pretended to.

It also became a powerful argument for not taking the Ukrainian amendments to this decision into account (like, we do not take either Ukrainian or Russian proposals into account).

And, unfortunately, this “anti-Russian procedure” game continued in the CM.

The voting results in the Committee of Ministers are non-public, so they cannot be verified. But according to European Pravda, Ukraine was the only country to vote against. Russia and several other states abstained. Instead, all (or almost all) of those whom Ukraine considered friendly states supported the new sanction mechanism, including Georgia, which presides the Committee of Ministers.

Although this does not seem too unexpected considering the statements of Georgian representatives in Strasbourg, when the Georgian president did dare to support new sanctions against Russia and the Foreign Minister did not even mention Russian aggression against his country in his speech.

And this, unfortunately, reflects a new reality, where not only the Council of Europe, but also our continent has found itself. “The attack on Ukraine, the occupation of the Crimea and their consequences are terrible, but let’s try to talk to Russia” – this opinion is becoming more and more common.

And even under these circumstances, Kyiv has nothing to do, but fight, trying to change what can be changed, give evidence, demand. Aggression against Ukraine country is ongoing, so it is not surprising that it hurts us the most.

Even if Ukraine remains the only one reminding its Western partners about the crimes of the Russian Federation, it should not stop doing so.

(c) EuromaidanPress


  • “But why did five Poles and three Georgians vote in favor of the sanctioning procedure that gets Russia out of trouble, and nobody from those states voted against? Why did all the Lithuanians abstain? And why did most MPs from the UK vote in favor?”

    Looks like Ukraine are on their own regarding this useless organisation. If Muscovy can’t be punished by PACE, there is absolutely no point being a part of it.

    Liked by 5 people

  • Excuse me while I puke.
    The putinazis have almost no countries left to oppose them. They have now almost taken over Georgia by stealth. Ukraine is virtually alone. This is reflected by putler’s new visa regime, which excludes Can/UK/US, the only ones to cause any trouble for the shit weasel and even that only in a relatively minor way. Certainly not enough to force a policy change.

    Liked by 5 people

    • They all publicly state they support Ukraine but their votes tell a different story. Then we can assume they would prefer Ukraine run back into the open warm hands of the murdering demon that has invaded and killed thousands.
      Clearly they do not support freedom nor democracy. Ukraine needs a new alliance in central and eastern Europe. Like-minded friends that understand the Filth. No doubt NATO would be thrilled too. Besides, western Europe is losing to the demographic caliphate anyway. Its just a matter of time.

      Liked by 5 people

      • As you know, if I had my way there would be a new military, intelligence sharing and free trade bloc consisting of the Five Eyes (US/Can/NZ/Aus/UK), plus Ukraine, Georgia, Pribaltika and Poland. I would invite Japan and South Korea to apply too. Membership would be open to other applicants only if they commit to sharing the same values. I don’t think there are any others, but I could be open to persuasion. Maybe Chile, Moldova and Mike’s favourite : Denmark?

        Liked by 4 people

  • It needs to be seen in context. Paris and Berlin are working hard on an anti-US islamofascist Euro-Empire. This requires russian support to get it done. This easily explains the voting behavior.

    Liked by 5 people

    • It doesn’t explain why the UK members voted for Russia, or Lithuania, both countries have been outspoken against Russia, none more so than Lithuania.

      Liked by 4 people

      • Ask them. In the end they supported Russia. Had Poroshenko not made EU membership constitutional without holding a referendum, and had he not totally failed on corruption, Ukraine would be treated differently. Zelensky is not fighting Moscow, but bending over. This did not remain unnoticed…

        Liked by 5 people

        • Poroshenko big mistake was not fighting corruption. As long as Ukraine remains rotten, Russia will always have a stranglehold on Ukraine.

          Liked by 3 people

          • Yes. The putler/yanuk business model remains virtually undisturbed. Or could even be moving backwards. Remember Eka Zguladze? She was brought in to clean up the police. From wiki:-
            “We’re not producing cosmetic changes; we need to create a brand new system of law enforcement.” On 5 July 2015, 2,000 new patrol police replaced Kyiv’s old traffic police, completely overhauled with new western-inspired uniforms. In September 2015, Zguladze said, “I’m a firm believer that Western values, Western democracy, and Western aspirations are the way for Georgia … and for Ukraine.”
            On 11 May 2016 Zguladze resigned as First Deputy Minister to lead an ad hoc group of advisers to the interior minister. Following this she gave up Ukrainian citizenship and became a citizen of Georgia again.
            And then there was Saakash: hired to clean up Odessa. That went tits up; he fell out with Poro and that was that.
            Local govt officials still collect their graft money, skim their cut off the top and deliver a carload of cash to Kyiv every week in their top end 4×4’s.

            Liked by 3 people

  • “The attack on Ukraine, the occupation of the Crimea and their consequences are terrible, but let’s try to talk to Russia”
    The attack on the woman, the rape, assault and battery and their consequences are terrible, but let’s try to talk to the criminal.
    Putting things in the right perspective can often help to decide what the right thing is to do. Clearly, Europe is a damaged continent. In the past ten years or so it has proven itself incapable of forming any sensible and righteous foreign policies and, just as bad, it has been committing self-immolation. The list of reasons for this is too long to refer to at this time. Suffice it to say, for now, Europe propagates human rights and the importance of abiding by international laws but then, time and again, it turns 180 degrees to appease crime syndicates like the Russia, Iran, North Korea and other well-known human rights abusers and international laws abusers. Only sometimes does it abide by its own calling. It has painted itself as the guardian of righteousness. But, the truth has slowly emerged that it really wallows in the same stinky, smelly, slimy cesspool in which all its new-found crime-ridden friends are floating in.
    As I’ve said many times before, Ukraine should not count on any real friends on this continent. It must see to it getting ship-shape on its own, more than less, and as far as it can. This, in the end, will create an even stronger and more independent country than if it has to rely on outside help for everything.
    Sorry for the harsh words about Europe, but this is what I see. And, there is no betterment in sight. Such is the age in which we currently live in. Sadly!

    Liked by 4 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.